EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Fabian Ruehle
dblp:277/5873
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 50% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
interpretable neural network |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
kolmogorov-arnold networks |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks · ICLR 2025 |
Computational science and engineering
scientific machine learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spline parametrization · 1.7kolmogorov-arnold representation theorem · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold NetworksabstractInspired by the Kolmogorov-Arnold representation theorem, we propose Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) as promising alternatives to Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs). While MLPs have fixed activation functions on nodes ("neurons''), KANs have learnable activation functions on edges ("weights''). KANs have no linear weights at all -- every weight parameter is replaced by a univariate function parametrized as a spline. We show that this seemingly simple change makes KANs outperform MLPs in terms of accuracy and interpretability, on small-scale AI + Science tasks. For accuracy, smaller KANs can achieve comparable or better accuracy than larger MLPs in function fitting tasks. Theoretically and empirically, KANs possess faster neural scaling laws than MLPs. For interpretability, KANs can be intuitively visualized and can easily interact with human users. Through two examples in mathematics and physics, KANs are shown to be useful ``collaborators'' helping scientists (re)discover mathematical and physical laws. In summary, KANs are promising alternatives for MLPs. Despite the slow training of KANs, their improved accuracy and interpretability show the potential to improve today's deep learning models which rely heavily on MLPs. More research is necessary to make KANs' training more efficient. Ziming Liu 0001, Sachin Vaidya, Fabian Ruehle, James Halverson, Marin Soljacic, Thomas Y. Hou 0001, Max Tegmark |
ICLR | 4 |