Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yeong-Dae Kwon

dblp:277/6514 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Language models and text generation · 27% Reinforcement learning · 25% Optimization for machine learning · 13%
Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 19 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
1.532022
Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022
Matrix encoding networks for neural combinatorial optimization · NeurIPS 2021
POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2020
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › learning-based combinatorial optimization
neural combinatorial optimization
1.532022
Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022
Matrix encoding networks for neural combinatorial optimization · NeurIPS 2021
POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit › pure-exploration bandit
active search
1.122022
Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022
Efficient Active Search for Combinatorial Optimization Problems · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning
1.012026
TLPO: Token-Level Policy Optimization for Mitigating Language Confusion in Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multilingual language models
1.012026
TLPO: Token-Level Policy Optimization for Mitigating Language Confusion in Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian approximation
0.812024
Improving Instruction Following in Language Models through Proxy-Based Uncertainty Estimation · ICML 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction following
0.812024
Improving Instruction Following in Language Models through Proxy-Based Uncertainty Estimation · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.812024
Improving Instruction Following in Language Models through Proxy-Based Uncertainty Estimation · ICML 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding › decoding strategy
beam search
0.612022
Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
combinatorial optimization
0.612022
Efficient Active Search for Combinatorial Optimization Problems · ICLR 2022
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
heuristic search
0.612022
Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › combinatorial optimization
neural combinatorial optimization
0.612022
Efficient Active Search for Combinatorial Optimization Problems · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy learning
0.612022
Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization
0.412020
POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2020
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › vehicle routing
traveling salesman problem
0.322021
Matrix encoding networks for neural combinatorial optimization · NeurIPS 2021
POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2020
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization
0.212022
Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization
routing problems
0.212022
Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022
Mathematical optimization › scheduling › shop scheduling
flow shop scheduling
0.112021
Matrix encoding networks for neural combinatorial optimization · NeurIPS 2021
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization
vehicle routing
0.112020
POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

active search · 1.7rollout · 1.1policy optimization · 1.0ORPO · 1.0GRPO · 1.0DPO · 1.0reward modeling · 0.8preference learning · 0.8bayesian approximation · 0.8simulation-guided beam search · 0.6reinforcement learning · 0.6end-to-end learning · 0.5attention mechanism · 0.5augmentation-based inference · 0.4REINFORCE · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 TLPO: Token-Level Policy Optimization for Mitigating Language Confusion in Large Language Models
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong multilingual capabilities, yet often fail to consistently generate responses in the intended language, exhibiting a phenomenon known as language confusion.Prior mitigation approaches based on sequence-level fine-tuning, such as DPO, ORPO, and GRPO, operate at the level of entire responses and can lead to unintended degradation of general model capabilities, motivating the need for more fine-grained alternatives.To address this, we introduce Token-Level Policy Optimization (TLPO), a fine-tuning framework designed to mitigate language confusion through localized, token-level updates. TLPO identifies error-prone positions, explores alternative candidate tokens, and updates the policy using a tailored objective to suppress error-inducing outputs at a granular level.This selective intervention enables effective mitigation of language confusion without compromising the model’s general abilities.Experiments on multiple multilingual LLMs across diverse languages demonstrate that TLPO significantly outperforms baselines in improving language consistency while preserving downstream task accuracy.
Jinho Choo, JunSeung Lee, Jimyeong Kim, Yeeho Song, S. K. Hong, Yeong-Dae Kwon
ACL (1)6
2025 Preference Consistency Matters: Enhancing Preference Learning in Language Models with Automated Self-Curation of Training Corpora
abstract
JoonHo Lee, JuYoun Son, Juree Seok, Wooseok Jang, Yeong-Dae Kwon. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
JoonHo Lee, JuYoun Son, Juree Seok, Woo-seok Jang, Yeong-Dae Kwon
NAACL (Long Papers)5
2024 Improving Instruction Following in Language Models through Proxy-Based Uncertainty Estimation
abstract
Assessing response quality to instructions in language models is vital but challenging due to the complexity of human language across different contexts. This complexity often results in ambiguous or inconsistent interpretations, making accurate assessment difficult. To address this issue, we propose a novel Uncertainty-aware Reward Model (URM) that introduces a robust uncertainty estimation for the quality of paired responses based on Bayesian approximation. Trained with preference datasets, our uncertainty-enabled proxy not only scores rewards for responses but also evaluates their inherent uncertainty. Empirical results demonstrate significant benefits of incorporating the proposed proxy into language model training. Our method boosts the instruction following capability of language models by refining data curation for training and improving policy optimization objectives, thereby surpassing existing methods by a large margin on benchmarks such as Vicuna and MT-bench. These findings highlight that our proposed approach substantially advances language model training and paves a new way of harnessing uncertainty within language models.
JoonHo Lee, Jae Oh Woo, Juree Seok, Parisa Hassanzadeh, Woo-seok Jang, JuYoun Son, Sima Didari, Baruch Gutow, Heng Hao, Hankyu Moon, Yeong-Dae Kwon, Seungjai Min
ICML12
2022 Efficient Active Search for Combinatorial Optimization Problems
André Hottung, Yeong-Dae Kwon, Kevin Tierney
ICLR2
2022 Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization
abstract
Neural approaches for combinatorial optimization (CO) equip a learning mechanism to discover powerful heuristics for solving complex real-world problems. While neural approaches capable of high-quality solutions in a single shot are emerging, state-of-the-art approaches are often unable to take full advantage of the solving time available to them. In contrast, hand-crafted heuristics perform highly effective search well and exploit the computation time given to them, but contain heuristics that are difficult to adapt to a dataset being solved. With the goal of providing a powerful search procedure to neural CO approaches, we propose simulation-guided beam search (SGBS), which examines candidate solutions within a fixed-width tree search that both a neural net-learned policy and a simulation (rollout) identify as promising. We further hybridize SGBS with efficient active search (EAS), where SGBS enhances the quality of solutions backpropagated in EAS, and EAS improves the quality of the policy used in SGBS. We evaluate our methods on well-known CO benchmarks and show that SGBS significantly improves the quality of the solutions found under reasonable runtime assumptions.
Jinho Choo, Yeong-Dae Kwon, Jeongwoo Jae, André Hottung, Kevin Tierney, Youngjune Gwon
NeurIPS2
2021 Matrix encoding networks for neural combinatorial optimization
abstract
Machine Learning (ML) can help solve combinatorial optimization (CO) problems better. A popular approach is to use a neural net to compute on the parameters of a given CO problem and extract useful information that guides the search for good solutions. Many CO problems of practical importance can be specified in a matrix form of parameters quantifying the relationship between two groups of items. There is currently no neural net model, however, that takes in such matrix-style relationship data as an input. Consequently, these types of CO problems have been out of reach for ML engineers. In this paper, we introduce Matrix Encoding Network (MatNet) and show how conveniently it takes in and processes parameters of such complex CO problems. Using an end-to-end model based on MatNet, we solve asymmetric traveling salesman (ATSP) and flexible flow shop (FFSP) problems as the earliest neural approach. In particular, for a class of FFSP we have tested MatNet on, we demonstrate a far superior empirical performance to any methods (neural or not) known to date.
Yeong-Dae Kwon, Jinho Choo, Iljoo Yoon, Minah Park, Duwon Park, Youngjune Gwon
NeurIPS1
2020 POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learning
abstract
In neural combinatorial optimization (CO), reinforcement learning (RL) can turn a deep neural net into a fast, powerful heuristic solver of NP-hard problems. This approach has a great potential in practical applications because it allows near-optimal solutions to be found without expert guides armed with substantial domain knowledge. We introduce Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima (POMO), an end-to-end approach for building such a heuristic solver. POMO is applicable to a wide range of CO problems. It is designed to exploit the symmetries in the representation of a CO solution. POMO uses a modified REINFORCE algorithm that forces diverse rollouts towards all optimal solutions. Empirically, the low-variance baseline of POMO makes RL training fast and stable, and it is more resistant to local minima compared to previous approaches. We also introduce a new augmentation-based inference method, which accompanies POMO nicely. We demonstrate the effectiveness of POMO by solving three popular NP-hard problems, namely, traveling salesman (TSP), capacitated vehicle routing (CVRP), and 0-1 knapsack (KP). For all three, our solver based on POMO shows a significant improvement in performance over all recent learned heuristics. In particular, we achieve the optimality gap of 0.14% with TSP100 while reducing inference time by more than an order of magnitude.
Yeong-Dae Kwon, Jinho Choo, Byoungjip Kim, Iljoo Yoon, Youngjune Gwon, Seungjai Min
NeurIPS1