Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Fabien Collas

dblp:277/6568 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured prediction › ranking model
mallows model
0.512021
Concentric mixtures of Mallows models for top-k rankings: sampling and identifiability · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured prediction
ranking model
0.512021
Concentric mixtures of Mallows models for top-k rankings: sampling and identifiability · ICML 2021
Data mining
clustering
0.512021
Concentric mixtures of Mallows models for top-k rankings: sampling and identifiability · ICML 2021
Data mining › clustering › model-based clustering
mixture model clustering
0.512021
Concentric mixtures of Mallows models for top-k rankings: sampling and identifiability · ICML 2021
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › social choice
rank aggregation
0.112021
Concentric mixtures of Mallows models for top-k rankings: sampling and identifiability · ICML 2021
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
social choice
0.112021
Concentric mixtures of Mallows models for top-k rankings: sampling and identifiability · ICML 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

borda algorithm · 1.5sampling algorithms · 1.0sampling algorithm · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Concentric mixtures of Mallows models for top-k rankings: sampling and identifiability
abstract
In this paper, we study mixtures of two Mallows models for top-$k$ rankings with equal location parameters but with different scale parameters (a mixture of concentric Mallows models). These models arise when we have a heterogeneous population of voters formed by two populations, one of which is a subpopulation of expert voters. We show the identifiability of both components and the learnability of their respective parameters. These results are based upon, first, bounding the sample complexity for the Borda algorithm with top-$k$ rankings. Second, we characterize the distances between rankings, showing that an off-the-shelf clustering algorithm separates the rankings by components with high probability -provided the scales are well-separated.As a by-product, we include an efficient sampling algorithm for Mallows top-$k$ rankings. Finally, since the rank aggregation will suffer from a large amount of noise introduced by the non-expert voters, we adapt the Borda algorithm to be able to recover the ground truth consensus ranking which is especially consistent with the expert rankings.
Fabien Collas, Ekhine Irurozki
ICML1