Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rishab Balasubramanian
dblp:277/9164
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 54% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 16% Efficient and distributed learning · 16% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Efficient Model Development through Fine-tuning Transfer · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial attack |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Adversarial Attacks on Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandits · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
combinatorial bandits |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Adversarial Attacks on Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandits · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Adversarial Attacks on Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandits · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › robust reinforcement learning › adversarial reinforcement learning
reward poisoning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Adversarial Attacks on Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandits · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Unified Off-Policy Learning to Rank: a Reinforcement Learning Perspective · NeurIPS 2023 |
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Unified Off-Policy Learning to Rank: a Reinforcement Learning Perspective · NeurIPS 2023 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
online decision making |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Adversarial Attacks on Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandits · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reward poisoning · 1.5attack algorithm design · 1.5markov decision process · 1.3iterative recycling-then-finetuning · 0.9click models · 0.7click model · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Efficient Model Development through Fine-tuning TransferabstractModern LLMs face a major obstacle: each new pre-trained model version requires expensive and repetitive alignment.We propose a method that transfers fine-tuning updates across model versions.The key idea is to extract the diff vector, which is the difference in parameters induced by fine-tuning, from a source model version and apply it to the base of a different target version.We show that transferring diff vectors significantly improves the target base model, often achieving performance comparable to its fine-tuned counterpart.For example, applying the fine-tuning updates from Llama 3.0 8B to Llama 3.1 8B increases accuracy by 46.9% on IFEval and 15.7% on Live-CodeBench without further training, surpassing Llama 3.1 8B Instruct.In multilingual settings, we also observe accuracy gains relative to Llama 3.1 8B Instruct, including 4.7% for Malagasy and 15.5% for Turkish on Global MMLU.Our controlled experiments reveal that fine-tuning transfer works best when source and target models are linearly connected in parameter space.We also show that this transfer provides a stronger and more efficient starting point for subsequent fine-tuning.Finally, we propose an iterative recycling-then-finetuning approach for continuous model development, which improves both efficiency and effectiveness.Our findings suggest that fine-tuning transfer is a viable strategy to reduce training costs while maintaining model performance.1 Pin-Jie Lin, Rishab Balasubramanian, Nikhil Kandpal, Tu Vu |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2024 | Adversarial Attacks on Combinatorial Multi-Armed BanditsabstractWe study reward poisoning attacks on Combinatorial Multi-armed Bandits (CMAB). We first provide a sufficient and necessary condition for the attackability of CMAB, a notion to capture the vulnerability and robustness of CMAB. The attackability condition depends on the intrinsic properties of the corresponding CMAB instance such as the reward distributions of super arms and outcome distributions of base arms. Additionally, we devise an attack algorithm for attackable CMAB instances. Contrary to prior understanding of multi-armed bandits, our work reveals a surprising fact that the attackability of a specific CMAB instance also depends on whether the bandit instance is known or unknown to the adversary. This finding indicates that adversarial attacks on CMAB are difficult in practice and a general attack strategy for any CMAB instance does not exist since the environment is mostly unknown to the adversary. We validate our theoretical findings via extensive experiments on real-world CMAB applications including probabilistic maximum covering problem, online minimum spanning tree, cascading bandits for online ranking, and online shortest path. Rishab Balasubramanian, Prasad Tadepalli, Huazheng Wang, Qingyun Wu |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Unified Off-Policy Learning to Rank: a Reinforcement Learning PerspectiveabstractOff-policy Learning to Rank (LTR) aims to optimize a ranker from data collected by a deployed logging policy. However, existing off-policy learning to rank methods often make strong assumptions about how users generate the click data, i.e., the click model, and hence need to tailor their methods specifically under different click models. In this paper, we unified the ranking process under general stochastic click models as a Markov Decision Process (MDP), and the optimal ranking could be learned with offline reinforcement learning (RL) directly. Building upon this, we leverage offline RL techniques for off-policy LTR and propose the Click Model-Agnostic Unified Off-policy Learning to Rank (CUOLR) method, which could be easily applied to a wide range of click models. Through a dedicated formulation of the MDP, we show that offline RL algorithms can adapt to various click models without complex debiasing techniques and prior knowledge of the model. Results on various large-scale datasets demonstrate that CUOLR consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art off-policy learning to rank algorithms while maintaining consistency and robustness under different click models. Hui Yuan 0002, Yiran Wu, Rishab Balasubramanian, Qingyun Wu, Huazheng Wang, Mengdi Wang 0001 |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2021 | Risk-Aware Submodular Optimization for Stochastic Travelling Salesperson ProblemabstractWe introduce a risk-aware variant of the Traveling Salesperson Problem (TSP), where the robot tour cost and reward have to be optimized simultaneously, while being subjected to uncertainty in both. We study the case where the rewards and the costs exhibit diminishing marginal gains, i.e., are submodular. Since the costs and the rewards are stochastic, we seek to maximize a risk metric known as Conditional-Value-at-Risk (CVaR) of the submodular function. We propose a Risk-Aware Greedy Algorithm (RAGA) to find an approximate solution for this problem. The approximation algorithm runs in polynomial time and is within a constant factor of the optimal and an additive term that depends on the value of optimal solution. We use the submodular function’s curvature to improve approximation results further and verify the algorithm’s performance through simulations. Rishab Balasubramanian, Lifeng Zhou 0001, Pratap Tokekar, P. B. Sujit |
IROS | 1 |