Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tom Wan

dblp:277/9166 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › point process
multivariate point process
0.412020
Noise-Contrastive Estimation for Multivariate Point Processes · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › density estimation
noise contrastive estimation
0.412020
Noise-Contrastive Estimation for Multivariate Point Processes · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
parameter estimation
0.412020
Noise-Contrastive Estimation for Multivariate Point Processes · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
point process
0.412020
Noise-Contrastive Estimation for Multivariate Point Processes · NeurIPS 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

noise contrastive estimation · 0.4maximum likelihood estimation · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Noise-Contrastive Estimation for Multivariate Point Processes
abstract
The log-likelihood of a generative model often involves both positive and negative terms. For a temporal multivariate point process, the negative term sums over all the possible event types at each time and also integrates over all the possible times. As a result, maximum likelihood estimation is expensive. We show how to instead apply a version of noise-contrastive estimation---a general parameter estimation method with a less expensive stochastic objective. Our specific instantiation of this general idea works out in an interestingly non-trivial way and has provable guarantees for its optimality, consistency and efficiency. On several synthetic and real-world datasets, our method shows benefits: for the model to achieve the same level of log-likelihood on held-out data, our method needs considerably fewer function evaluations and less wall-clock time.
Hongyuan Mei, Tom Wan, Jason Eisner
NeurIPS2