Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yoonna Jang
dblp:277/9316
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-3971-082XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 45% Language models and text generation · 30% Information extraction and text analysis · 24% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
entity discovery |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Post-hoc Utterance Refining Method by Entity Mining for Faithful Knowledge Grounded Conversations · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
faithful generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Post-hoc Utterance Refining Method by Entity Mining for Faithful Knowledge Grounded Conversations · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
knowledge-grounded dialogue |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Post-hoc Utterance Refining Method by Entity Mining for Faithful Knowledge Grounded Conversations · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
task-oriented dialogue |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Call for Customized Conversation: Customized Conversation Grounding Persona and Knowledge · AAAI 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
pre-trained language model |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Call for Customized Conversation: Customized Conversation Grounding Persona and Knowledge · AAAI 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
post-hoc refinement · 0.7GPT-2 · 0.6BART · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | SERA: Self-referential assessment framework for bidirectional generative commonsense reasoning
Jaehyung Seo, Hyeonseok Moon, Yoonna Jang, Heuiseok Lim |
Knowl. Based Syst. | 3 |
| 2025 | An analysis on language transfer of pre-trained language model with cross-lingual post-training
Suhyune Son, Chanjun Park, Jungseob Lee, Midan Shim, Chanhee Lee 0004, Yoonna Jang, Jaehyung Seo, Jungwoo Lim, Heuiseok Lim |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 6 |
| 2023 | Post-hoc Utterance Refining Method by Entity Mining for Faithful Knowledge Grounded ConversationsabstractYoonna Jang, Suhyune Son, Jeongwoo Lee, Junyoung Son, Yuna Hur, Jungwoo Lim, Hyeonseok Moon, Kisu Yang, Heuiseok Lim. Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2023. Yoonna Jang, Suhyune Son, Junyoung Son, Yuna Hur, Jungwoo Lim, Hyeonseok Moon, Kisu Yang, Heuiseok Lim |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2023 | Doubts on the reliability of parallel corpus filtering
Hyeonseok Moon, Chanjun Park, Seonmin Koo, Jungseob Lee, Jaehyung Seo, Sugyeong Eo, Yoonna Jang, Hyunjoong Kim, Hyoung-gyu Lee, Heuiseok Lim |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 8 |
| 2022 | Call for Customized Conversation: Customized Conversation Grounding Persona and KnowledgeabstractHumans usually have conversations by making use of prior knowledge about a topic and background information of the people whom they are talking to. However, existing conversational agents and datasets do not consider such comprehensive information, and thus they have a limitation in generating the utterances where the knowledge and persona are fused properly. To address this issue, we introduce a call For Customized conversation (FoCus) dataset where the customized answers are built with the user's persona and Wikipedia knowledge. To evaluate the abilities to make informative and customized utterances of pre-trained language models, we utilize BART and GPT-2 as well as transformer-based models. We assess their generation abilities with automatic scores and conduct human evaluations for qualitative results. We examine whether the model reflects adequate persona and knowledge with our proposed two sub-tasks, persona grounding (PG) and knowledge grounding (KG). Moreover, we show that the utterances of our data are constructed with the proper knowledge and persona through grounding quality assessment. Yoonna Jang, Jungwoo Lim, Yuna Hur, Dongsuk Oh, Suhyune Son, Yeonsoo Lee, Dong-Hoon Shin, Seungryong Kim, Heuiseok Lim |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2022 | FreeTalky: Don't Be Afraid! Conversations Made Easier by a Humanoid Robot using Persona-based DialogueabstractWe propose a deep learning-based foreign language learning platform, named FreeTalky, for people who experience anxiety dealing with foreign languages, by employing a humanoid robot NAO and various deep learning models. A persona-based dialogue system that is embedded in NAO provides an interesting and consistent multi-turn dialogue for users. Also, an grammar error correction system promotes improvement in grammar skills of the users. Thus, our system enables personalized learning based on persona dialogue and facilitates grammar learning of a user using grammar error feedback. Furthermore, we verified whether FreeTalky provides practical help in alleviating xenoglossophobia by replacing the real human in the conversation with a NAO robot, through human evaluation. Chanjun Park, Yoonna Jang, Seolhwa Lee, Heuiseok Lim |
LREC | 2 |
| 2020 | I Know What You Asked: Graph Path Learning using AMR for Commonsense ReasoningabstractCommonsenseQA is a task in which a correct answer is predicted through commonsense reasoning with pre-defined knowledge.Most previous works have aimed to improve the performance with distributed representation without considering the process of predicting the answer from the semantic representation of the question.To shed light upon the semantic interpretation of the question, we propose an AMR-ConceptNet-Pruned (ACP) graph.The ACP graph is pruned from a full integrated graph encompassing Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) graph generated from input questions and an external commonsense knowledge graph, ConceptNet (CN).Then the ACP graph is exploited to interpret the reasoning path as well as to predict the correct answer on the CommonsenseQA task.This paper presents the manner in which the commonsense reasoning process can be interpreted with the relations and concepts provided by the ACP graph.Moreover, ACP-based models are shown to outperform the baselines. Jungwoo Lim, Dongsuk Oh, Yoonna Jang, Kisu Yang, Heuiseok Lim |
COLING | 3 |