Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anirudh Nair
dblp:277/9420
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Robot navigation and mapping · 55% Reinforcement learning · 29% Motion planning and robot control · 11% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
learning-based navigation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Benchmarking Reinforcement Learning Techniques for Autonomous Navigation · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
mobile robot navigation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Benchmarking Reinforcement Learning Techniques for Autonomous Navigation · ICRA 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Benchmarking Reinforcement Learning Techniques for Autonomous Navigation · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › learning-based navigation
reinforcement-learning-based navigation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Benchmarking Reinforcement Learning Techniques for Autonomous Navigation · ICRA 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
safe reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Benchmarking Reinforcement Learning Techniques for Autonomous Navigation · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › mobile robot navigation
adaptive navigation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | APPLR: Adaptive Planner Parameter Learning from Reinforcement · ICRA 2021 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › parameter tuning
planner parameter tuning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | APPLR: Adaptive Planner Parameter Learning from Reinforcement · ICRA 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain generalization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Benchmarking Reinforcement Learning Techniques for Autonomous Navigation · ICRA 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
memory-based neural network architectures · 0.7domain randomization · 0.7simulation · 0.5reinforcement learning · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Benchmarking Reinforcement Learning Techniques for Autonomous NavigationabstractDeep reinforcement learning (RL) has brought many successes for autonomous robot navigation. However, there still exists important limitations that prevent real-world use of RL-based navigation systems. For example, most learning approaches lack safety guarantees; and learned navigation systems may not generalize well to unseen environments. Despite a variety of recent learning techniques to tackle these challenges in general, a lack of an open-source benchmark and reproducible learning methods specifically for autonomous navigation makes it difficult for roboticists to choose what learning methods to use for their mobile robots and for learning researchers to identify current shortcomings of general learning methods for autonomous navigation. In this paper, we identify four major desiderata of applying deep RL approaches for autonomous navigation: (D1) reasoning under uncertainty, (D2) safety, (D3) learning from limited trial-and-error data, and (D4) generalization to diverse and novel environments. Then, we explore four major classes of learning techniques with the purpose of achieving one or more of the four desiderata: memory-based neural network architectures (D1), safe RL (D2), model-based RL (D2, D3), and domain randomization (D4). By deploying these learning techniques in a new open-source large-scale navigation benchmark and real-world environments, we perform a comprehensive study aimed at establishing to what extent can these techniques achieve these desiderata for RL-based navigation systems. Zifan Xu, Bo Liu 0042, Xuesu Xiao, Anirudh Nair, Peter Stone 0001 |
ICRA | 4 |
| 2021 | APPLR: Adaptive Planner Parameter Learning from ReinforcementabstractClassical navigation systems typically operate using a fixed set of hand-picked parameters (e.g. maximum speed, sampling rate, inflation radius, etc.) and require heavy expert re-tuning in order to work in new environments. To mitigate this requirement, it has been proposed to learn parameters for different contexts in a new environment using human demonstrations collected via teleoperation. However, learning from human demonstration limits deployment to the training environment, and limits overall performance to that of a potentially-suboptimal demonstrator. In this paper, we introduce APPLR, Adaptive Planner Parameter Learning from Reinforcement, which allows existing navigation systems to adapt to new scenarios by using a parameter selection scheme discovered via reinforcement learning (RL) in a wide variety of simulation environments. We evaluate APPLR on a robot in both simulated and physical experiments, and show that it can outperform both a fixed set of hand-tuned parameters and also a dynamic parameter tuning scheme learned from human demonstration. Zifan Xu, Gauraang Dhamankar, Anirudh Nair, Xuesu Xiao, Garrett Warnell, Bo Liu 0042, Peter Stone 0001 |
ICRA | 3 |