In this work, we highlight vulnerabilities in robotic systems integrating large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) due to input modality sensitivities. While LLM/VLM-controlled robots show impressive performance across various tasks, their reliability under slight input variations remains underexplored yet critical. These models are highly sensitive to instruction or perceptual input changes, which can trigger misalignment issues, leading to execution failures with severe real-world consequences. To study this issue, we analyze the misalignment-induced vulnerabilities within LLM/VLM-controlled robotic systems and present a mathematical formulation for failure modes arising from variations in input modalities. We propose empirical perturbation strategies to expose these vulnerabilities and validate their effectiveness through experiments on multiple robot manipulation tasks. Our results show that simple input perturbations reduce task execution success rates by 22.2% and 14.6% in two representative LLM/VLM-controlled robotic systems. These findings underscore the importance of input modality robustness and motivate further research to ensure the safe and reliable deployment of advanced LLM/VLM-controlled robotic systems.

Vision Language models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable success in video understanding tasks. Yet, a key question remains: Do they comprehend visual information or merely learn superficial mappings between visual and textual patterns? Understanding visual cues, particularly those related to physics and common sense, is crucial for AI systems interacting with the physical world. However, existing VLM evaluations primarily rely on positive-control tests using real-world videos that resemble training distributions. While VLMs perform well on such benchmarks, it is unclear whether they grasp underlying visual and contextual signals or simply exploit visual-language correlations. To fill this gap, we propose incorporating negative-control tests, i.e., videos depicting physically impossible or logically inconsistent scenarios, and evaluating whether models can recognize these violations. True visual understanding should evince comparable performance across both positive and negative tests. Since such content is rare in the real world, we introduce VideoHallu, a synthetic video dataset featuring physics- and commonsense-violating scenes generated using state-of-the-art tools such as Veo2, Sora, and Kling. The dataset includes expert-annotated question-answer pairs spanning four categories of physical and commonsense violations, designed to be straightforward for human reasoning. We evaluate several leading VLMs, including Qwen-2.5-VL, Video-R1, and VideoChat-R1. Despite their strong performance on real-world benchmarks (e.g., MVBench, MMVU), these models hallucinate or fail to detect physical or logical violations, revealing fundamental weaknesses in visual understanding. Finally, we explore reinforcement learning-based post-training on our negative dataset: fine-tuning improves performance on VideoHallu without degrading results on standard benchmarks, indicating enhanced visual reasoning in VLMs. Our data is available at https://github.com/zli12321/VideoHallu.git.

We introduce “HALLUSIONBENCH11“Hallusion” is a portmanteau of “hallucination” and “illusion.”,” a comprehensive benchmark designed for the evaluation of image-context rea-soning. This benchmark presents significant challenges to advanced large visual-language models (LVLMs), such as GPT-4V(ision), Gemini Pro Vision, Claude 3, and LLaVA-1.5, by emphasizing nuanced understanding and interpre-tation of visual data. The benchmark comprises 346 images paired with 1129 questions, all meticulously crafted by human experts. We introduce a novel structure for these visual questions designed to establish control groups. This structure enables us to conduct a quantitative analysis of the models' response tendencies, logical consistency, and various failure modes. In our evaluation on Hallusion-bench, we benchmarked 15 different models, highlighting a 31.42% question-pair accuracy achieved by the state-of-the-art GPT-4V. Notably, all other evaluated models achieve accuracy below 16%. Moreover, our analysis not only high-lights the observed failure modes, including language hal-lucination and visual illusion but also deepens an under-standing of these pitfalls. Our comprehensive case studies within Hallusionbench shed light on the challenges of hallucination and illusion in LVLMs. Based on these in-sights, we suggest potential pathways for their future im-provement. The benchmark and codebase can be accessed at https://github.com/tianyi-labIHallusionBench.

We present AGL-NET, a novel learning-based method for global localization using LiDAR point clouds and satellite maps. AGL-Net tackles two critical challenges: bridging the representation gap between image and points modalities for robust feature matching, and handling inherent scale discrepancies between global view and local view. To address these challenges, AGL-Net leverages a unified network architecture with a novel two-stage matching design. The first stage extracts informative neural features directly from raw sensor data and performs initial feature matching. The second stage refines this matching process by extracting informative skeleton features and incorporating a novel scale alignment step to rectify scale variations between LiDAR and map data. Furthermore, a novel scale and skeleton loss function guides the network toward learning scale-invariant feature representations, eliminating the need for pre-processing satellite maps. This significantly improves real-world applicability in scenarios with unknown map scales. To facilitate rigorous performance evaluation, we introduce a meticulously designed dataset within the CARLA simulator specifically tailored for metric localization training and assessment.

Navigating robots through unstructured terrains is challenging, primarily due to the dynamic environmental changes. While humans adeptly navigate such terrains by using context from their observations, creating a similar context-aware navigation system for robots is difficult. The essence of the issue lies in the acquisition and interpretation of context information, a task complicated by the inherent ambiguity of human language. In this work, we introduce LANCAR, which addresses this issue by combining a context translator with reinforcement learning (RL) agents for context-aware locomotion. LANCAR allows robots to comprehend context information through Large Language Models (LLMs) sourced from human observers and convert this information into actionable context embeddings. These embeddings, combined with the robot’s sensor data, provide a complete input for the RL agent’s policy network. We provide an extensive evaluation of LANCAR under different levels of context ambiguity and compare with alternative methods. The experimental results showcase the superior generalizability and adaptability across different terrains. Notably, LANCAR shows at least a 7.4% increase in episodic reward over the best alternatives, highlighting its potential to enhance robotic navigation in unstructured environments. More details and experiment videos could be found in this link.