Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stefan Würsten

dblp:278/0442 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 77% Software maintenance and evolution · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing
performance testing
0.412020
Dynamically reconfiguring software microbenchmarks: reducing execution time without sacrificing result quality · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2020
Software maintenance and evolution › release engineering
continuous integration
0.112020
Dynamically reconfiguring software microbenchmarks: reducing execution time without sacrificing result quality · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

dynamic reconfiguration · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Dynamically reconfiguring software microbenchmarks: reducing execution time without sacrificing result quality
abstract
Executing software microbenchmarks, a form of small-scale performance tests predominantly used for libraries and frameworks, is a costly endeavor. Full benchmark suites take up to multiple hours or days to execute, rendering frequent checks, e.g., as part of continuous integration (CI), infeasible. However, altering benchmark configurations to reduce execution time without considering the impact on result quality can lead to benchmark results that are not representative of the software’s true performance.
Christoph Laaber, Stefan Würsten, Harald C. Gall, Philipp Leitner 0001
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE2