EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Po-Nien Kung
dblp:278/2288
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0007-0780-8335ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Language models and text generation · 42% Information extraction and text analysis · 23% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 11% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Web and social media mining · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% |
Topics — the 24 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Web and social media mining
information diffusion |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | MIDDAG: Where Does Our News Go? Investigating Information Diffusion via Community-Level Information Pathways · AAAI 2024 Where Does Your News Come From? Predicting Information Pathways in Social Media · SIGIR 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding
constrained decoding |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Decoupling Task-Solving and Output Formatting in LLM Generation · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
decoding |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Decoupling Task-Solving and Output Formatting in LLM Generation · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
structured generation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Decoupling Task-Solving and Output Formatting in LLM Generation · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
constrained text generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Adaptable Logical Control for Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › event extraction
event detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Improving Event Definition Following For Zero-Shot Event Detection · ACL (1) 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
event extraction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | STAR: Boosting Low-Resource Information Extraction by Structure-to-Text Data Generation with Large Language Models · AAAI 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction
low-resource relation extraction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | STAR: Boosting Low-Resource Information Extraction by Structure-to-Text Data Generation with Large Language Models · AAAI 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | STAR: Boosting Low-Resource Information Extraction by Structure-to-Text Data Generation with Large Language Models · AAAI 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › controllable text generation
text editing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Adaptable Logical Control for Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
zero-shot learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Improving Event Definition Following For Zero-Shot Event Detection · ACL (1) 2024 |
Visualization and visual analytics › interactive visualization
interactive visualization system |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | MIDDAG: Where Does Our News Go? Investigating Information Diffusion via Community-Level Information Pathways · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
cross-task generalization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Active Instruction Tuning: Improving Cross-Task Generalization by Training on Prompt Sensitive Tasks · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction tuning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Active Instruction Tuning: Improving Cross-Task Generalization by Training on Prompt Sensitive Tasks · EMNLP 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
link prediction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Where Does Your News Come From? Predicting Information Pathways in Social Media · SIGIR 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › curriculum reinforcement learning
task selection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Active Instruction Tuning: Improving Cross-Task Generalization by Training on Prompt Sensitive Tasks · EMNLP 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › multi-task learning › auxiliary learning
auxiliary task selection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Efficient Multi-Task Auxiliary Learning: Selecting Auxiliary Data by Feature Similarity · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
data-efficient learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Efficient Multi-Task Auxiliary Learning: Selecting Auxiliary Data by Feature Similarity · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Efficient Multi-Task Auxiliary Learning: Selecting Auxiliary Data by Feature Similarity · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
mathematical reasoning |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Decoupling Task-Solving and Output Formatting in LLM Generation · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › synthetic data generation
LLM-based data generation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | STAR: Boosting Low-Resource Information Extraction by Structure-to-Text Data Generation with Large Language Models · AAAI 2024 |
Computational social science and digital humanities
social media analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | MIDDAG: Where Does Our News Go? Investigating Information Diffusion via Community-Level Information Pathways · AAAI 2024 |
Automata and formal languages › finite automata
deterministic finite automata |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Adaptable Logical Control for Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Web and social media mining › social network analysis
social network |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Where Does Your News Come From? Predicting Information Pathways in Social Media · SIGIR 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
propagation forecasting · 2.3community detection · 2.3neuro-symbolic framework · 1.5hidden markov model · 1.5trie-building · 1.0instruction-aware distillation · 1.0HMM state pruning · 1.0structure-to-text generation · 0.8self-reflection · 0.8self-refinement · 0.8large language model · 0.8event definition generation · 0.8graph neural network · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Decoupling Task-Solving and Output Formatting in LLM GenerationabstractLarge language models (LLMs) are increasingly adept at solving complex problems, such as mathematical reasoning and automatic evaluation.However, performance often degrades when prompts intertwine task instructions with rigid formatting requirements.This entanglement creates competing goals for the model, hindering its reasoning capabilities.To address this, we introduce DECO-G, a decoding framework that explicitly decouples format adherence from problem solving.DECO-G delegates format adherence to a separate Format Estimation Module (FEM), which performs probabilistic lookahead to estimate future format compliance rate and reweighs token probabilities, allowing the LLM to focus solely on task resolution.To make this approach both practical and efficient, we introduce three key innovations: instruction-aware distillation, a flexible trie-building algorithm, and HMM state pruning.Experiments across mathematical reasoning, event argument extraction, and LLM-asa-judge demonstrate that DECO-G constantly gains over prompting or structured generation baselines, with guaranteed format compliance. Haikang Deng, Po-Nien Kung, Nanyun Peng 0001 |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2024 | MIDDAG: Where Does Our News Go? Investigating Information Diffusion via Community-Level Information PathwaysabstractWe present MIDDAG, an intuitive, interactive system that visualizes the information propagation paths on social media triggered by COVID-19-related news articles accompanied by comprehensive insights including user/community susceptibility level, as well as events and popular opinions raised by the crowd while propagating the information. Besides discovering information flow patterns among users, we construct communities among users and develop the propagation forecasting capability, enabling tracing and understanding of how information is disseminated at a higher level. A demo video and more are available at https://info-pathways.github.io. Mingyu Derek Ma, Alexander K. Taylor 0002, Nuan Wen, Po-Nien Kung, Wenna Qin, Shicheng Wen, Azure Zhou, Diyi Yang, Xuezhe Ma, Nanyun Peng 0001, Wei Wang 0010 |
AAAI | 5 |
| 2024 | STAR: Boosting Low-Resource Information Extraction by Structure-to-Text Data Generation with Large Language ModelsabstractInformation extraction tasks such as event extraction require an in-depth understanding of the output structure and sub-task dependencies. They heavily rely on task-specific training data in the form of (passage, target structure) pairs to obtain reasonable performance. However, obtaining such data through human annotation is costly, leading to a pressing need for low-resource information extraction approaches that require minimal human labeling for real-world applications. Fine-tuning supervised models with synthesized training data would be a generalizable method, but the existing data generation methods either still rely on large-scale ground-truth data or cannot be applied to complicated IE tasks due to their poor performance. To address these challenges, we propose STAR, a data generation method that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to synthesize data instances given limited seed demonstrations, thereby boosting low-resource information extraction performance. Our approach involves generating target structures (Y) followed by generating passages (X), all accomplished with the aid of LLMs. We design fine-grained step-by-step instructions to obtain the initial data instances. We further reduce errors and improve data quality through self-reflection error identification and self-refinement with iterative revision. Our experiments show that the data generated by STAR significantly improve the performance of low-resource event extraction and relation extraction tasks, even surpassing the effectiveness of human-curated data. Human assessment of the data quality shows STAR-generated data exhibit higher passage quality and better align with the task definitions compared with the human-curated data. Mingyu Derek Ma, Po-Nien Kung, P. Jeffrey Brantingham, Nanyun Peng 0001, Wei Wang 0010 |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2024 | Improving Event Definition Following For Zero-Shot Event DetectionabstractZefan Cai, Po-Nien Kung, Ashima Suvarna, Mingyu Ma, Hritik Bansal, Baobao Chang, P. Jeffrey Brantingham, Wei Wang, Nanyun Peng. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024. Zefan Cai, Po-Nien Kung, Ashima Suvarna, Mingyu Derek Ma, Hritik Bansal, Baobao Chang, P. Jeffrey Brantingham, Wei Wang 0010, Nanyun Peng 0001 |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2024 | Adaptable Logical Control for Large Language ModelsabstractDespite the success of Large Language Models (LLMs) on various tasks following human instructions, controlling model generation to follow strict constraints at inference time poses a persistent challenge. In this paper, we introduce Ctrl-G, a neuro-symbolic framework that enables tractable and adaptable control of LLM generation to follow logical constraints reliably. Ctrl-G combines any production-ready LLM with a Hidden Markov Model (HMM), guiding LLM outputs to adhere to logical constraints represented as deterministic finite automata. We show that Ctrl-G, when a TULU2-7B model is coupled with a 2B-parameter HMM, outperforms GPT4 in text editing: on the task of generating text insertions/continuations following logical constraints, our approach achieves over 30% higher satisfaction rate in human evaluation. When applied to medium-size language models (e.g., GPT2-large), Ctrl-G also beats its counterparts on standard benchmarks by large margins. Additionally, as a proof-of-concept study, we use Ctrl-G to assist LLM reasoning on the GSM benchmark, foreshadowing the application of Ctrl-G, as well as other constrained generation approaches, beyond traditional language generation tasks. Honghua Zhang, Po-Nien Kung, Masahiro Yoshida, Guy Van den Broeck, Nanyun Peng 0001 |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2023 | Active Instruction Tuning: Improving Cross-Task Generalization by Training on Prompt Sensitive TasksabstractInstruction tuning (IT) achieves impressive zero-shot generalization results by training large language models (LLMs) on a massive amount of diverse tasks with instructions.However, how to select new tasks to improve the performance and generalizability of IT models remains an open question.Training on all existing tasks is impractical due to prohibiting computation requirements, and randomly selecting tasks can lead to suboptimal performance.In this work, we propose active instruction tuning based on prompt uncertainty, a novel framework to identify informative tasks, and then actively tune the models on the selected tasks.We represent the informativeness of new tasks with the disagreement of the current model outputs over perturbed prompts.Our experiments on NIV2 and Self-Instruct datasets demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms other baseline strategies for task selection, achieving better out-of-distribution generalization with fewer training tasks.Additionally, we introduce a task map that categorizes and diagnoses tasks based on prompt uncertainty and prediction probability.We discover that training on ambiguous (prompt-uncertain) tasks improves generalization while training on difficult (prompt-certain and low-probability) tasks offers no benefit, underscoring the importance of task selection for instruction tuning. 1 Po-Nien Kung, Fan Yin, Di Wu 0054, Kai-Wei Chang 0001, Nanyun Peng 0001 |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2023 | Where Does Your News Come From? Predicting Information Pathways in Social MediaabstractAs social networks become further entrenched in modern society, it becomes increasingly important to understand and predict how information (e.g., news coverage of a given event) is propagated across social media (i.e., information pathway), which helps the understandings of the impact of real-world information. Thus, in this paper, we propose a novel task, Information Pathway Prediction (IPP), which depicts the propagation paths of a given passage as a community tree (rooted at the information source) on constructed community interaction graphs where we first aggregate individual users into communities formed around news sources and influential users, and then elucidate the patterns of information dissemination across media based on such community nodes. We argue that this is an important and useful task because, on one hand, community-level interactions offer more stability than those at the user level; on the other hand, individual users are often influenced by their community, and modeling community-level information propagation will help the traditional link-prediction problem. To tackle the IPP task, we introduce Lightning, a novel content-aware link prediction GNN model and demonstrate using a large Twitter dataset consisting of all COVID related tweets that Lightning outperforms state-of-the-art link prediction baselines by a significant margin. Alexander K. Taylor 0002, Nuan Wen, Po-Nien Kung, Jiaao Chen, Violet Peng, Wei Wang 0010 |
SIGIR | 3 |
| 2021 | Efficient Multi-Task Auxiliary Learning: Selecting Auxiliary Data by Feature SimilarityabstractMulti-task auxiliary learning utilizes a set of relevant auxiliary tasks to improve the performance of a primary task.A common usage is to manually select multiple auxiliary tasks for multi-task learning on all data, which raises two issues: (1) selecting beneficial auxiliary tasks for a primary task is nontrivial; (2) when the auxiliary datasets are large, training on all data becomes time-expensive and impractical.Therefore, this paper focuses on addressing these problems and proposes a timeefficient sampling method to select the data that is most relevant to the primary task.The proposed method allows us to only train on the most beneficial sub-datasets from the auxiliary tasks, achieving efficient multi-task auxiliary learning.The experiments on three benchmark datasets (RTE, MRPC, STS-B) show that our method significantly outperforms random sampling and ST-DNN.Also, by applying our method, the model can surpass fully-trained MT-DNN on RTE, MRPC, STS-B, using only 50%, 66%, and 1% of data, respectively.1 Po-Nien Kung, Sheng-Siang Yin, Tse-Hsuan Yang, Yun-Nung Chen |
EMNLP (1) | 1 |