Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alex Tarter

dblp:278/2409 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational complexity · 60% Information theory · 20% Coding theory · 20%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory › source coding
gaussian source
0.812024
Dimension-Free Noninteractive Simulation From Gaussian Sources · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024
Computational complexity › boolean function analysis
invariance principle
0.812024
Dimension-Free Noninteractive Simulation From Gaussian Sources · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024
Information theory › network information theory › source simulation
noninteractive simulation
0.812024
Dimension-Free Noninteractive Simulation From Gaussian Sources · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024
Computational complexity › learning theory
sample complexity
0.812024
Dimension-Free Noninteractive Simulation From Gaussian Sources · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024
Computational complexity › computational models
simulation complexity
0.812024
Dimension-Free Noninteractive Simulation From Gaussian Sources · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

invariance principle · 0.8brute-force search · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Dimension-Free Noninteractive Simulation From Gaussian Sources
abstract
LetXandYbe two real-valued random variables. Let (X1,Y1), (X2,Y2),... be independent identically distributed copies of (X,Y). Suppose there are two players A and B. Player A has access toX1,X2,... and player B has access toY1,Y2,.... Without communication, what joint probability distributions can players A and B jointly simulate? That is, ifk,mare fixed positive integers, what probability distributions on {1,...,m}2are equal to the distribution of (f(X1,...,Xk),g(Y1,...,Yk)) for somef,g: Rk→ {1,...,m}? WhenXandYare standard Gaussians with fixed correlation ρ ∈ (-1, 1), we show that the set of probability distributions that can be noninteractively simulated fromkGaussian samples is the same for anyk≥m2. Previously, it was not even known if this number of samplesm2would be finite or not, except whenm≤ 2. Consequently, a straightforward brute-force search deciding whether or not a probability distribution on {1,...,m}2is within distance 0kcorrelated Gaussian samples has run time bounded by (5/ε)m(log(ε/2)/ log |ρ|)m2, improving a bound of Ghazi, Kamath and Raghavendra. A nonlinear central limit theorem (i.e. invariance principle) of Mossel then generalizes this result to decide whether or not a probability distribution on {1,...,m}2is within distance 0ksamples of a given finite discrete distribution (X,Y) in run time that does not depend onk, with constants that again improve a bound of Ghazi, Kamath and Raghavendra.
Steven Heilman, Alex Tarter
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2
2018 Detection of moving objects through turbulent media. Decomposition of Oscillatory vs Non-Oscillatory spatio-temporal vector fields
Jérôme Gilles, Francis Alvarez, Nicholas B. Ferrante, Margaret Fortman, Lena Tahir, Alex Tarter, Anneke von Seeger
Image Vis. Comput.6