Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jingyang Xiang
dblp:278/2812
· DBLP profile ↗
12ranked-venue papers
3as first author
12since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-5350-1528ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 3 first-author · 10 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 92% Trustworthy machine learning · 6% Deep learning architectures and training · 3% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
2.9 | 4 | 2024 | Structured Optimal Brain Pruning for Large Language Models · EMNLP 2024 OvSW: Overcoming Silent Weights for Accurate Binary Neural Networks · ECCV (33) 2024 MaxQ: Multi-Axis Query for N: m Sparsity Network · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | MaxQ: Multi-Axis Query for N: m Sparsity Network · CVPR 2024 SUBP: Soft Uniform Block Pruning for 1×N Sparse CNNs Multithreading Acceleration · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning
structured pruning |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Structured Optimal Brain Pruning for Large Language Models · EMNLP 2024 SUBP: Soft Uniform Block Pruning for 1×N Sparse CNNs Multithreading Acceleration · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › quantization › quantized neural network
binary neural network |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | OvSW: Overcoming Silent Weights for Accurate Binary Neural Networks · ECCV (33) 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning › transformer pruning
large language model pruning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Structured Optimal Brain Pruning for Large Language Models · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › sparsity
n:m sparsity |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | MaxQ: Multi-Axis Query for N: m Sparsity Network · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning › adversarial defense
adversarial example detection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Detecting Adversarial Samples with Graph-Guided Testing · ASE 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | MaxQ: Multi-Axis Query for N: m Sparsity Network · CVPR 2024 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator
CNN accelerator |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | SUBP: Soft Uniform Block Pruning for 1×N Sparse CNNs Multithreading Acceleration · NeurIPS 2023 |
Software testing
deep learning testing |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Detecting Adversarial Samples with Graph-Guided Testing · ASE 2021 |
Software testing › mutation testing
model mutation testing |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Detecting Adversarial Samples with Graph-Guided Testing · ASE 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multithreading · 1.3block pruning · 1.3graph-guided testing · 1.0weight quantization · 0.8silent weight suppression · 0.8optimal brain pruning · 0.8module-wise reconstruction · 0.8greedy refinement · 0.8gradual sparsity scheduling · 0.8dynamic soft mask generation · 0.8model mutation testing · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Automatic data-free pruning via channel similarity reconstruction
Siqi Li 0009, Jun Chen 0023, Jingyang Xiang, Chengrui Zhu, Jiandang Yang, Xiaobin Wei, Yunliang Jiang, Yong Liu 0007 |
Neurocomputing | 3 |
| 2026 | SampleLLM: Prune LLMs via learnable structure sampling
Jiateng Wei, Siqi Li 0009, Jingyang Xiang, Longqi Wang, Chuang Guo, Jun Chen 0023, Baochang Zhu, Yong Liu 0007 |
Neurocomputing | 4 |
| 2026 | WLR: Well-conditioned linear reconstruction for retraining-free pruning of LLMs
Siqi Li 0009, Jingyang Xiang, Jiateng Wei, Chengrui Zhu, Jiandang Yang, Jun Chen 0023, Jian Yang 0003, Xiaobin Wei, Yunliang Jiang, Yong Liu 0007 |
Neural Networks | 2 |
| 2026 | OOPS: Outlier-aware and quadratic programming based structured pruning for large language models
Jiateng Wei, Siqi Li 0009, Jingyang Xiang, Jiandang Yang, Jun Chen 0023, Xiaobin Wei, Yunliang Jiang, Yong Liu 0007 |
Neural Networks | 3 |
| 2025 | Hyperbolic Binary Neural NetworkabstractBinary neural network (BNN) converts full-precision weights and activations into their extreme 1-bit counterparts, making it particularly suitable for deployment on lightweight mobile devices. While BNNs are typically formulated as a constrained optimization problem and optimized in the binarized space, general neural networks are formulated as an unconstrained optimization problem and optimized in the continuous space. This article introduces the hyperbolic BNN (HBNN) by leveraging the framework of hyperbolic geometry to optimize the constrained problem. Specifically, we transform the constrained problem in hyperbolic space into an unconstrained one in Euclidean space using the Riemannian exponential map. On the other hand, we also propose the exponential parametrization cluster (EPC) method, which, compared with the Riemannian exponential map, shrinks the segment domain based on a diffeomorphism. This approach increases the probability of weight flips, thereby maximizing the information gain in BNNs. Experimental results on CIFAR10, CIFAR100, and ImageNet classification datasets with VGGsmall, ResNet18, and ResNet34 models illustrate the superior performance of our HBNN over state-of-the-art methods. Jun Chen 0023, Jingyang Xiang, Tianxin Huang, Xiangrui Zhao, Yong Liu 0007 |
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst. | 2 |
| 2024 | MaxQ: Multi-Axis Query for N: m Sparsity NetworkabstractN:m sparsity has received increasing attention due to its remarkable performance and latency trade-off compared with structured and unstructured sparsity. How-ever, existing N:m sparsity methods do not differentiate the relative importance of weights among blocks and leave important weights underappreciated. Besides, they di-rectly apply N:m sparsity to the whole network, which will cause severe information loss. Thus, they are still sub-optimal. In this paper, we propose an efficient and effective Multi-Axis Query methodology, dubbed as MaxQ, to rectify these problems. During the training, MaxQ employs a dynamic approach to generate soft N:m masks, considering the weight importance across multiple axes. This method enhances the weights with more importance and ensures more effective updates. Meanwhile, a spar-sity strategy that gradually increases the percentage of N:m weight blocks is applied, which allows the network to heal from the pruning-induced damage progressively. During the runtime, the N:m soft masks can be precom-puted as constants and folded into weights without causing any distortion to the sparse pattern and incurring ad-ditional computational overhead. Comprehensive experi-ments demonstrate that MaxQ achieves consistent improve-ments across diverse CNN architectures in various com-puter vision tasks, including image classification, object detection and instance segmentation. For ResNet50 with 1:16 sparse pattern, MaxQ can achieve 74.6% top-1 ac-curacy on ImageNet and improve by over 2.8% over the state-of-the-art. Codes and checkpoints are available at https://github.com/JingyangXiang/MaxQ. Jingyang Xiang, Siqi Li 0009, Zhuangzhi Chen, Tianxin Huang, Linpeng Peng, Yong Liu 0007 |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2024 | OvSW: Overcoming Silent Weights for Accurate Binary Neural Networks
Jingyang Xiang, Zuohui Chen, Siqi Li 0009, Yong Liu 0007 |
ECCV (33) | 1 |
| 2024 | Structured Optimal Brain Pruning for Large Language ModelsabstractThe massive parameters and computational demands hinder the widespread application of Large Language Models (LLMs).Network pruning provides a practical solution to this problem.However, existing pruning works for LLMs mainly focus on unstructured pruning or necessitate post-pruning fine-tuning.The former relies on special hardware to accelerate computation, while the latter may need substantial computational resources.In this paper, we introduce a retraining-free structured pruning method called SoBP (Structured Optimal Brain Pruning).It leverages global first-order information to select pruning structures, then refines them with a local greedy approach, and finally adopts module-wise reconstruction to mitigate information loss.We assess the effectiveness of SoBP across 14 models from 3 LLM families on 8 distinct datasets.Experimental results demonstrate that SoBP outperforms current state-of-the-art methods. Jiateng Wei, Siqi Li 0009, Jingyang Xiang, Jun Chen 0023, Yong Liu 0007 |
EMNLP | 5 |
| 2024 | GGT: Graph-guided testing for adversarial sample detection of deep neural network
Zuohui Chen, Renxuan Wang, Jingyang Xiang, Yue Yu 0001, Xin Xia 0001, Shouling Ji, Qi Xuan 0001, Xiaoniu Yang |
Comput. Secur. | 3 |
| 2024 | RGP: Neural Network Pruning Through Regular Graph With Edges SwappingabstractDeep learning technology has found a promising application in lightweight model design, for which pruning is an effective means of achieving a large reduction in both model parameters and float points operations (FLOPs). The existing neural network pruning methods mostly start from the consideration of the importance of model parameters and design parameter evaluation metrics to perform parameter pruning iteratively. These methods were not studied from the perspective of network model topology, so they might be effective but not efficient, and they require completely different pruning for different datasets. In this article, we study the graph structure of the neural network and propose a regular graph pruning (RGP) method to perform a one-shot neural network pruning. Specifically, we first generate a regular graph and set its node-degree values to meet the preset pruning ratio. Then, we reduce the average shortest path-length (ASPL) of the graph by swapping edges to obtain the optimal edge distribution. Finally, we map the obtained graph to a neural network structure to realize pruning. Our experiments demonstrate that the ASPL of the graph is negatively correlated with the classification accuracy of the neural network and that RGP has a strong precision retention capability with high parameter reduction (more than 90%) and FLOPs reduction (more than 90%) (the code for quick use and reproduction is available at https://github.com/Holidays1999/Neural-Network-Pruning-through-its-RegularGraph-Structure). Zhuangzhi Chen, Jingyang Xiang, Yao Lu 0041, Qi Xuan 0001, Zhen Wang 0004, Guanrong Chen, Xiaoniu Yang |
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst. | 2 |
| 2023 | SUBP: Soft Uniform Block Pruning for 1×N Sparse CNNs Multithreading Acceleration
Jingyang Xiang, Siqi Li 0009, Jun Chen 0023, Guang Dai, Shipeng Bai, Yukai Ma, Yong Liu 0007 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Detecting Adversarial Samples with Graph-Guided TestingabstractDeep Neural Networks (DNN) are known to be vulnerable to adversarial samples, the detection of which is crucial for the wide application of these DNN models. Recently, a number of deep testing methods in software engineering were proposed to find the vulnerability of DNN systems, and one of them, i.e., Model Mutation Testing (MMT), was used to successfully detect various adversarial samples generated by different kinds of adversarial attacks. However, the mutated models in MMT are always huge in number (e.g., over 100 models) and lack diversity (e.g., can be easily circumvented by high-confidence adversarial samples), which makes it less efficient in real applications and less effective in detecting high-confidence adversarial samples. In this study, we propose Graph-Guided Testing (GGT) for adversarial sample detection to overcome these aforementioned challenges. GGT generates pruned models with the guide of graph characteristics, each of them has only about 5% parameters of the mutated model in MMT, and graph guided models have higher diversity. The initial experiments on CIFAR10 validate that GGT performs much better than MMT with respect to both effectiveness and efficiency. Zuohui Chen, Renxuan Wang, Jingyang Xiang, Yue Yu 0001, Xin Xia 0001, Shouling Ji, Qi Xuan 0001, Xiaoniu Yang |
ASE | 3 |