Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Roman Levin
dblp:278/3201
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 34% Deep learning architectures and training · 26% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 20% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
tabular deep learning |
0.9 | 2 | 2023 | A Performance-Driven Benchmark for Feature Selection in Tabular Deep Learning · NeurIPS 2023 Transfer Learning with Deep Tabular Models · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
feature selection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Performance-Driven Benchmark for Feature Selection in Tabular Deep Learning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Where do Models go Wrong? Parameter-Space Saliency Maps for Explainability · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › visual explanation
saliency map |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Where do Models go Wrong? Parameter-Space Saliency Maps for Explainability · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 0.7lasso · 0.7input-gradient-based selection · 0.7nearest neighbor analysis · 0.6fine-tuning · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Transfer Learning with Deep Tabular Models
Roman Levin, Valeriia Cherepanova, Avi Schwarzschild, Arpit Bansal, C. Bayan Bruss, Tom Goldstein, Andrew Gordon Wilson, Micah Goldblum |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2023 | A Performance-Driven Benchmark for Feature Selection in Tabular Deep LearningabstractAcademic tabular benchmarks often contain small sets of curated features. In contrast, data scientists typically collect as many features as possible into their datasets, and even engineer new features from existing ones. To prevent over-fitting in subsequent downstream modeling, practitioners commonly use automated feature selection methods that identify a reduced subset of informative features. Existing benchmarks for tabular feature selection consider classical downstream models, toy synthetic datasets, or do not evaluate feature selectors on the basis of downstream performance. We construct a challenging feature selection benchmark evaluated on downstream neural networks including transformers, using real datasets and multiple methods for generating extraneous features. We also propose an input-gradient-based analogue of LASSO for neural networks that outperforms classical feature selection methods on challenging problems such as selecting from corrupted or second-order features. Valeriia Cherepanova, Roman Levin, Gowthami Somepalli, Jonas Geiping, C. Bayan Bruss, Andrew Gordon Wilson, Tom Goldstein, Micah Goldblum |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2022 | Where do Models go Wrong? Parameter-Space Saliency Maps for ExplainabilityabstractConventional saliency maps highlight input features to which neural network predictions are highly sensitive. We take a different approach to saliency, in which we identify and analyze the network parameters, rather than inputs, which are responsible for erroneous decisions. We first verify that identified salient parameters are indeed responsible for misclassification by showing that turning these parameters off improves predictions on the associated samples more than turning off the same number of random or least salient parameters. We further validate the link between salient parameters and network misclassification errors by observing that fine-tuning a small number of the most salient parameters on a single sample results in error correction on other samples which were misclassified for similar reasons -- nearest neighbors in the saliency space. After validating our parameter-space saliency maps, we demonstrate that samples which cause similar parameters to malfunction are semantically similar. Further, we introduce an input-space saliency counterpart which reveals how image features cause specific network components to malfunction. Roman Levin, Manli Shu, Eitan Borgnia, Furong Huang, Micah Goldblum, Tom Goldstein |
NeurIPS | 1 |