Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Siddhant Bharti
dblp:278/3575
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-6379-5232ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Language models and text generation · 46% Trustworthy machine learning · 25% Representation and self-supervised learning · 19% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tool Preferences in Agentic LLMs are Unreliable · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
hallucination detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | LLM-Check: Investigating Detection of Hallucinations in Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
hidden state analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | LLM-Check: Investigating Detection of Hallucinations in Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | LLM-Check: Investigating Detection of Hallucinations in Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
graphical model inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | An Inference Algorithm for Multi-label MRF-MAP Problems with Clique Size 100 · ECCV (20) 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | An Inference Algorithm for Multi-label MRF-MAP Problems with Clique Size 100 · ECCV (20) 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
energy minimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | An Inference Algorithm for Multi-label MRF-MAP Problems with Clique Size 100 · ECCV (20) 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Tool Preferences in Agentic LLMs are Unreliable · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | LLM-Check: Investigating Detection of Hallucinations in Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
empirical evaluation · 0.9agentic benchmarking · 0.9output probability analysis · 0.8attention map analysis · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Tool Preferences in Agentic LLMs are UnreliableabstractKazem Faghih, Wenxiao Wang, Yize Cheng, Siddhant Bharti, Gaurang Sriramanan, Sriram Balasubramanian, Parsa Hosseini, Soheil Feizi. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025. Kazem Faghih, Wenxiao Wang 0002, Yize Cheng, Siddhant Bharti, Gaurang Sriramanan, Sriram Balasubramanian, Parsa Hosseini, Soheil Feizi |
EMNLP | 4 |
| 2024 | LLM-Check: Investigating Detection of Hallucinations in Large Language ModelsabstractWhile Large Language Models (LLMs) have become immensely popular due to their outstanding performance on a broad range of tasks, these models are prone to producing hallucinations— outputs that are fallacious or fabricated yet often appear plausible or tenable at a glance. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive investigation into the nature of hallucinations within LLMs and furthermore explore effective techniques for detecting such inaccuracies in various real-world settings. Prior approaches to detect hallucinations in LLM outputs, such as consistency checks or retrieval-based methods, typically assume access to multiple model responses or large databases. These techniques, however, tend to be computationally expensive in practice, thereby limiting their applicability to real-time analysis. In contrast, in this work, we seek to identify hallucinations within a single response in both white-box and black-box settings by analyzing the internal hidden states, attention maps, and output prediction probabilities of an auxiliary LLM. In addition, we also study hallucination detection in scenarios where ground-truth references are also available, such as in the setting of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). We demonstrate that the proposed detection methods are extremely compute-efficient, with speedups of up to 45x and 450x over other baselines, while achieving significant improvements in detection performance over diverse datasets. Gaurang Sriramanan, Siddhant Bharti, Vinu Sankar Sadasivan, Shoumik Saha, Priyatham Kattakinda, Soheil Feizi |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2020 | An Inference Algorithm for Multi-label MRF-MAP Problems with Clique Size 100
Ishant Shanu, Siddhant Bharti, Chetan Arora 0001, S. N. Maheshwari |
ECCV (20) | 2 |