Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Giancarlo Bonora

dblp:278/3765 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 44% Representation and self-supervised learning · 44% Trustworthy machine learning · 13%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
clustering
0.512021
ACE: Explaining cluster from an adversarial perspective · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
deep clustering
0.512021
ACE: Explaining cluster from an adversarial perspective · ICML 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › functional genomics
marker gene identification
0.512021
ACE: Explaining cluster from an adversarial perspective · ICML 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis › single-cell RNA sequencing
single-cell RNA-seq analysis
0.512021
ACE: Explaining cluster from an adversarial perspective · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.112021
ACE: Explaining cluster from an adversarial perspective · ICML 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

deep learning · 1.0adversarial clustering explanation · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 ACE: Explaining cluster from an adversarial perspective
abstract
A common workflow in single-cell RNA-seq analysis is to project the data to a latent space, cluster the cells in that space, and identify sets of marker genes that explain the differences among the discovered clusters. A primary drawback to this three-step procedure is that each step is carried out independently, thereby neglecting the effects of the nonlinear embedding and inter-gene dependencies on the selection of marker genes. Here we propose an integrated deep learning framework, Adversarial Clustering Explanation (ACE), that bundles all three steps into a single workflow. The method thus moves away from the notion of "marker genes" to instead identify a panel of explanatory genes. This panel may include genes that are not only enriched but also depleted relative to other cell types, as well as genes that exhibit differences between closely related cell types. Empirically, we demonstrate that ACE is able to identify gene panels that are both highly discriminative and nonredundant, and we demonstrate the applicability of ACE to an image recognition task.
Yang Young Lu, Timothy C. Yu, Giancarlo Bonora, William Stafford Noble
ICML3
2020 Capturing cell type-specific chromatin compartment patterns by applying topic modeling to single-cell Hi-C data
abstract
Single-cell Hi-C (scHi-C) interrogates genome-wide chromatin interaction in individual cells, allowing us to gain insights into 3D genome organization. However, the extremely sparse nature of scHi-C data poses a significant barrier to analysis, limiting our ability to tease out hidden biological information. In this work, we approach this problem by applying topic modeling to scHi-C data. Topic modeling is well-suited for discovering latent topics in a collection of discrete data. For our analysis, we generate nine different single-cell combinatorial indexed Hi-C (sci-Hi-C) libraries from five human cell lines (GM12878, H1Esc, HFF, IMR90, and HAP1), consisting over 19,000 cells. We demonstrate that topic modeling is able to successfully capture cell type differences from sci-Hi-C data in the form of "chromatin topics." We further show enrichment of particular compartment structures associated with locus pairs in these topics.
Galip Gürkan Yardimci, Giancarlo Bonora, Vijay Ramani, Jie Liu 0045, Ruolan Qiu, Choli Lee, Jennifer Hesson, Carol B. Ware, Jay Shendure, Zhi-jun Duan, William Stafford Noble
PLoS Comput. Biol.3