Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Leimeng Xu
dblp:278/6014
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-2614-3742ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Motion planning and robot control · 40% Deep learning architectures and training · 40% Autonomous driving · 12% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Embedded and real-time systems · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
learning-based motion planning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Generalizing Motion Planners with Mixture of Experts for Autonomous Driving · ICRA 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
mixture of experts |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Generalizing Motion Planners with Mixture of Experts for Autonomous Driving · ICRA 2025 |
Embedded and real-time systems › cyber-physical system platforms
autonomous vehicle computing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Building the Computing System for Autonomous Micromobility Vehicles: Design Constraints and Architectural Optimizations · MICRO 2020 |
Embedded and real-time systems
cyber-physical system platforms |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Building the Computing System for Autonomous Micromobility Vehicles: Design Constraints and Architectural Optimizations · MICRO 2020 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving › simulation
closed-loop simulation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Generalizing Motion Planners with Mixture of Experts for Autonomous Driving · ICRA 2025 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
localization |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Eudoxus: Characterizing and Accelerating Localization in Autonomous Machines Industry Track Paper · HPCA 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
software-hardware co-design · 1.0FPGA prototyping · 1.0vision transformer · 0.9mixture of experts · 0.9causal transformer · 0.9architectural optimization · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Generalizing Motion Planners with Mixture of Experts for Autonomous DrivingabstractLarge real-world driving datasets have sparked significant research into various aspects of learning-based motion planners for autonomous driving. These include data augmentation, model architecture, reward design, training strategies, and planner pipelines. In this paper, we review and benchmark previous methods. Experiments show that many of these approaches have limited generalization abilities in planning performance due to overly complex designs or training paradigms. Experiments further reveal that as models are appropriately scaled, many designs become redundant. Therefore, we introduce StateTransformer-2 (STR2), a scalable, decoder-only motion planner. STR2uses a Vision Transformer (ViT) encoder and a mix-of-experts (MoE) causal transformer architecture. The MoE backbone addresses modality collapse and reward balancing by expert routing during training. Extensive experiments on the NuPlan dataset show that our method generalizes better than previous approaches across different test sets and closed-loop simulations. We evaluate its scalability on billions of real-world urban driving scenarios, demonstrating consistent accuracy improvements as both data and model size grow. Qiao Sun 0001, Jiahao Zhan, Fan Nie, Leimeng Xu, Kun Zhan, Peng Jia 0007, Xianpeng Lang, Hang Zhao 0021 |
ICRA | 6 |
| 2021 | Eudoxus: Characterizing and Accelerating Localization in Autonomous Machines Industry Track PaperabstractWe develop and commercialize autonomous machines, such as logistic robots and self-driving cars, around the globe. A critical challenge to our—and any—autonomous machine is accurate and efficient localization under resource constraints, which has fueled specialized localization accelerators recently. Prior acceleration efforts are point solutions in that they each specialize for a specific localization algorithm. In real-world commercial deployments, however, autonomous machines routinely operate under different environments and no single localization algorithm fits all the environments. Simply stacking together point solutions not only leads to cost and power budget overrun, but also results in an overly complicated software stack. This paper demonstrates our new software-hardware co-designed framework for autonomous machine localization, which adapts to different operating scenarios by fusing fundamental algorithmic primitives. Through characterizing the software framework, we identify ideal acceleration candidates that contribute significantly to the end-to-end latency and/or latency variation. We show how to co-design a hardware accelerator to systematically exploit the parallelisms, locality, and common building blocks inherent in the localization framework. We build, deploy, and evaluate an FPGA prototype on our next-generation self-driving cars. To demonstrate the flexibility of our framework, we also instantiate another FPGA prototype targeting drones, which represent mobile autonomous machines. We achieve about $2 \times$ speedup and $4 \times$ energy reduction compared to widely-deployed, optimized implementations on general-purpose platforms. Yiming Gan, Bo Yu 0014, Boyuan Tian, Leimeng Xu, Shaoshan Liu, Qiang Liu 0011, Jie Tang 0003, Yuhao Zhu 0001 |
HPCA | 4 |
| 2020 | Building the Computing System for Autonomous Micromobility Vehicles: Design Constraints and Architectural OptimizationsabstractThis paper presents the computing system design in our commercial autonomous vehicles, and provides a detailed performance, energy, and cost analyses. Drawing from our commercial deployment experience, this paper has two objectives. First, we highlight design constraints unique to autonomous vehicles that might change the way we approach existing architecture problems. Second, we identify new architecture and systems problems that are perhaps less studied before but are critical to autonomous vehicles. Bo Yu 0014, Leimeng Xu, Jie Tang 0003, Shaoshan Liu, Yuhao Zhu 0001 |
MICRO | 3 |