Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nico Montali
dblp:278/7348
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Autonomous driving · 53% Reinforcement learning · 30% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 9% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Autonomous driving
behavior modeling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | The Waymo Open Sim Agents Challenge · NeurIPS 2023 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving › simulation
driving simulation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Waymax: An Accelerated, Data-Driven Simulator for Large-Scale Autonomous Driving Research · NeurIPS 2023 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
planning for self-driving vehicles |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Waymax: An Accelerated, Data-Driven Simulator for Large-Scale Autonomous Driving Research · NeurIPS 2023 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
simulation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | The Waymo Open Sim Agents Challenge · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
importance sampling |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Importance Sampling Techniques for Policy Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Importance Sampling Techniques for Policy Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Importance Sampling Techniques for Policy Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy search |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Importance Sampling Techniques for Policy Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
variance reduction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Importance Sampling Techniques for Policy Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Waymax: An Accelerated, Data-Driven Simulator for Large-Scale Autonomous Driving Research · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.7reinforcement learning · 0.7imitation learning · 0.7evaluation metrics · 0.7behavior modeling · 0.7per-decision importance sampling · 0.4multiple importance sampling · 0.4importance sampling · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Waymax: An Accelerated, Data-Driven Simulator for Large-Scale Autonomous Driving ResearchabstractSimulation is an essential tool to develop and benchmark autonomous vehicle planning software in a safe and cost-effective manner. However, realistic simulation requires accurate modeling of multi-agent interactive behaviors to be trustworthy, behaviors which can be highly nuanced and complex. To address these challenges, we introduce Waymax, a new data-driven simulator for autonomous driving in multi-agent scenes, designed for large-scale simulation and testing. Waymax uses publicly-released, real-world driving data (e.g., the Waymo Open Motion Dataset) to initialize or play back a diverse set of multi-agent simulated scenarios. It runs entirely on hardware accelerators such as TPUs/GPUs and supports in-graph simulation for training, making it suitable for modern large-scale, distributed machine learning workflows. To support online training and evaluation, Waymax includes several learned and hard-coded behavior models that allow for realistic interaction within simulation. To supplement Waymax, we benchmark a suite of popular imitation and reinforcement learning algorithms with ablation studies on different design decisions, where we highlight the effectiveness of routes as guidance for planning agents and the ability of RL to overfit against simulated agents. Cole Gulino, Justin Fu, George Tucker, Eli Bronstein, Yiren Lu 0001, Jean Harb, Xinlei Pan, Yan Wang 0051, Xiangyu Chen 0007, John D. Co-Reyes, Rishabh Agarwal, Rebecca Roelofs, Yao Lu 0006, Nico Montali, Paul Mougin, Zoey Yang, Brandyn White, Aleksandra Faust, Rowan McAllister, Dragomir Anguelov, Benjamin Sapp |
NeurIPS | 15 |
| 2023 | The Waymo Open Sim Agents ChallengeabstractSimulation with realistic, interactive agents represents a key task for autonomous vehicle software development. In this work, we introduce the Waymo Open Sim Agents Challenge (WOSAC). WOSAC is the first public challenge to tackle this task and propose corresponding metrics. The goal of the challenge is to stimulate the design of realistic simulators that can be used to evaluate and train a behavior model for autonomous driving. We outline our evaluation methodology, present results for a number of different baseline simulation agent methods, and analyze several submissions to the 2023 competition which ran from March 16, 2023 to May 23, 2023. The WOSAC evaluation server remains open for submissions and we discuss open problems for the task. Nico Montali, John Lambert, Paul Mougin, Alex Kuefler, Nicholas Rhinehart, Michelle Li, Cole Gulino, Tristan Emrich, Zoey Yang, Shimon Whiteson, Brandyn White, Dragomir Anguelov |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Importance Sampling Techniques for Policy OptimizationabstractHow can we effectively exploit the collected samples when solving a continuous control task with Reinforcement Learning? Recent results have empirically demonstrated that multiple policy optimization steps can be performed with the same batch by using off-distribution techniques based on importance sampling. However, when dealing with off-distribution optimization, it is essential to take into account the uncertainty introduced by the importance sampling process. In this paper, we propose and analyze a class of model-free, policy search algorithms that extend the recent Policy Optimization via Importance Sampling (Metelli et al., 2018) by incorporating two advanced variance reduction techniques: per-decision and multiple importance sampling. For both of them, we derive a high-probability bound, of independent interest, and then we show how to employ it to define a suitable surrogate objective function that can be used for both action-based and parameter-based settings. The resulting algorithms are finally evaluated on a set of continuous control tasks, using both linear and deep policies, and compared with modern policy optimization methods. Alberto Maria Metelli, Matteo Papini, Nico Montali, Marcello Restelli |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |