Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rajalaxmi Rajagopalan
dblp:279/1624
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 73% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 27% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers |
Accessibility and assistive technology · 54% Health and well-being technologies · 46% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
gaussian process regression |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Kernel Learning for Sample Constrained Black-Box Optimization · AAAI 2025 Sample-Constrained Black Box Optimization for Audio Personalization · AAAI 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
black-box optimization |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Kernel Learning for Sample Constrained Black-Box Optimization · AAAI 2025 Sample-Constrained Black Box Optimization for Audio Personalization · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods
kernel learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Kernel Learning for Sample Constrained Black-Box Optimization · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process › sparse gaussian process
sparse gaussian process regression |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Sample-Constrained Black Box Optimization for Audio Personalization · AAAI 2024 |
Accessibility and assistive technology › assistive technology
hearing aid personalization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Kernel Learning for Sample Constrained Black-Box Optimization · AAAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational autoencoder · 2.6kernel learning · 2.6gaussian process · 2.6surrogate modeling · 2.3gaussian process regression · 2.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Kernel Learning for Sample Constrained Black-Box OptimizationabstractBlack box optimization (BBO) focuses on optimizing unknown functions in high-dimensional spaces. In many applications, sampling the unknown function is expensive, imposing a tight sample budget.Ongoing work is making progress on reducing the sample budget by learning the shape/structure of the function, known as kernel learning. We propose a new method to learn the kernel of a Gaussian Process. Our idea is to create a continuous kernel space in the latent space of a variational autoencoder, and run an auxiliary optimization to identify the best kernel. Results show that the proposed method, Kernel Optimized Blackbox Optimization (KOBO), outperforms state of the art by estimating the optimal at considerably lower sample budgets. Results hold not only across synthetic benchmark functions but also in real applications. We show that a hearing aid may be personalized with fewer audio queries to the user, or a generative model could converge to desirable images from limited user ratings. Rajalaxmi Rajagopalan, Yu-Lin Wei, Romit Roy Choudhury |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2024 | Sample-Constrained Black Box Optimization for Audio PersonalizationabstractWe consider the problem of personalizing audio to maximize user experience. Briefly, we aim to find a filter h*, which applied to any music or speech, will maximize the user’s satisfaction. This is a black-box optimization problem since the user’s satisfaction function is unknown. Substantive work has been done on this topic where the key idea is to play audio samples to the user, each shaped by a different filter hi, and query the user for their satisfaction scores f(hi). A family of “surrogate” functions is then designed to fit these scores and the optimization method gradually refines these functions to arrive at the filter ˆh* that maximizes satisfaction. In certain applications, we observe that a second type of querying is possible where users can tell us the individual elements h*[j] of the optimal filter h*. Consider an analogy from cooking where the goal is to cook a recipe that maximizes user satisfaction. A user can be asked to score various cooked recipes (e.g., tofu fried rice) or to score individual ingredients (say, salt, sugar, rice, chicken, etc.). Given a budget of B queries, where a query can be of either type, our goal is to find the recipe that will maximize this user’s satisfaction. Our proposal builds on Sparse Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) and shows how a hybrid approach can outperform any one type of querying. Our results are validated through simulations and real world experiments, where volunteers gave feedback on music/speech audio and were able to achieve high satisfaction levels. We believe this idea of hybrid querying opens new problems in black-box optimization and solutions can benefit other applications beyond audio personalization. Rajalaxmi Rajagopalan, Yu-Lin Wei, Romit Roy Choudhury |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2020 | Active Learning for IoT Data Prioritization in Edge Nodes Over Wireless NetworksabstractThe Internet of Things (IoT) has emerged as a key networking infrastructure that connects a large number of sensors, thereby allowing the collection and processing of large amounts of sensor data efficiently. Edge computing involves the deployment of computing devices close to sensor locations in order to process sensor data and derive useful information quickly and efficiently near the source. This improves the quality of the collected data and reduces the strain on the underlying communication networks. The obtained data can be used for a number of inference tasks using machine learning. The majority of machine learning research efforts assume that the collected data is untainted by various effects in the data collection or transmission process. The data-driven models generated with this assumption and the inferences drawn are frequently unusable in practical scenarios. Predictive maintenance is the process of utilizing sensor data obtained from equipment to determine and predict the optimal time for maintenance of the equipment. Using predictive maintenance, the time and money spent on maintaining equipment can be greatly reduced. In this paper, we perform distributed modeling using edge computing to determine the Remaining Useful Lifetime (RUL) of machines used in a manufacturing plant. We analyze the effects of wireless network degradation on the accuracy of the distributed models and propose active learning algorithms to mitigate these effects, thereby improving the usefulness and robustness of predictive maintenance in realistic settings. Chen-Khong Tham, Rajalaxmi Rajagopalan |
IECON | 2 |