Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Seungryong Yoo
dblp:279/3657
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 25% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 25% Deep learning architectures and training · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Improving Visual Prompt Tuning for Self-supervised Vision Transformers · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning › self-supervised visual representation learning
self-supervised vision transformer |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Improving Visual Prompt Tuning for Self-supervised Vision Transformers · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
vision transformer |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Improving Visual Prompt Tuning for Self-supervised Vision Transformers · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › parameter-efficient transfer learning
visual prompt tuning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Improving Visual Prompt Tuning for Self-supervised Vision Transformers · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prompt token insertion · 0.7gated prompt tuning · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | SAVE: Sparse Autoencoder-Driven Visual Information Enhancement for Mitigating Object HallucinationabstractAlthough Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have advanced substantially, they remain vulnerable to object hallucination caused by language priors and visual information loss. To address this, we propose SAVE (Sparse Autoencoder-Driven Visual Information Enhancement), a framework that mitigates hallucination by steering the model along Sparse Autoencoder (SAE) latent features. A binary object-presence question-answering probe identifies the SAE features most indicative of the model’s visual information processing, referred to as visual understanding features. Steering the model along these identified features reinforces grounded visual understanding and effectively reduces hallucination. With its simple design, SAVE outperforms state-of-the-art training-free methods on standard benchmarks, achieving a 10%p improvement in CHAIRSand consistent gains on POPE and MMHal-Bench. Extensive evaluations across multiple models and layers confirm the robustness and generalizability of our approach. Further analysis reveals that steering along visual understanding features suppresses the generation of uncertain object tokens and increases attention to image tokens, mitigating hallucination. Code is released at https://github.com/wiarae/SAVE. Sangha Park, Seungryong Yoo, Jisoo Mok, Sungroh Yoon |
WACV | 2 |
| 2023 | Improving Visual Prompt Tuning for Self-supervised Vision TransformersabstractVisual Prompt Tuning (VPT) is an effective tuning method for adapting pretrained Vision Transformers (ViTs) to downstream tasks. It leverages extra learnable tokens, known as prompts, which steer the frozen pretrained ViTs. Although VPT has demonstrated its applicability with supervised vision transformers, it often underperforms with self-supervised ones. Through empirical observations, we deduce that the effectiveness of VPT hinges largely on the ViT blocks with which the prompt tokens interact. Specifically, VPT shows improved performance on image classification tasks for MAE and MoCo v3 when the prompt tokens are inserted into later blocks rather than the first block. These observations suggest that there exists an optimal location of blocks for the insertion of prompt tokens. Unfortunately, identifying the optimal blocks for prompts within each self-supervised ViT for diverse future scenarios is a costly process. To mitigate this problem, we propose a simple yet effective method that learns a gate for each ViT block to adjust its intervention into the prompt tokens. With our method, prompt tokens are selectively influenced by blocks that require steering for task adaptation. Our method outperforms VPT variants in FGVC and VTAB image classification and ADE20K semantic segmentation. The code is available at https://github.com/ryongithub/GatedPromptTuning. Seungryong Yoo, Eunji Kim 0002, Dahuin Jung, Jungbeom Lee, Sungroh Yoon |
ICML | 1 |