Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Trang H. Tran
dblp:279/4007
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 52% Representation and self-supervised learning · 29% Deep learning architectures and training · 19% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 20 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization › stochastic gradient methods
shuffling gradient methods |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Shuffling Gradient-Based Methods for Nonconvex-Concave Minimax Optimization · NeurIPS 2024 Nesterov Accelerated Shuffling Gradient Method for Convex Optimization · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Improving Time Series Encoding with Noise-Aware Self-Supervised Learning and an Efficient Encoder · ICDM 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network
dilated convolution |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Improving Time Series Encoding with Noise-Aware Self-Supervised Learning and an Efficient Encoder · ICDM 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
encoder architecture |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Improving Time Series Encoding with Noise-Aware Self-Supervised Learning and an Efficient Encoder · ICDM 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning › robust contrastive learning
noise-robust contrastive learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Improving Time Series Encoding with Noise-Aware Self-Supervised Learning and an Efficient Encoder · ICDM 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › sequence representation learning
time series representation learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Improving Time Series Encoding with Noise-Aware Self-Supervised Learning and an Efficient Encoder · ICDM 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
minimax optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Shuffling Gradient-Based Methods for Nonconvex-Concave Minimax Optimization · NeurIPS 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › minimax optimization
nonconvex-concave saddle point problem |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Shuffling Gradient-Based Methods for Nonconvex-Concave Minimax Optimization · NeurIPS 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Shuffling Gradient-Based Methods for Nonconvex-Concave Minimax Optimization · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On the Convergence to a Global Solution of Shuffling-Type Gradient Algorithms · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On the Convergence to a Global Solution of Shuffling-Type Gradient Algorithms · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic gradient descent
random reshuffling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On the Convergence to a Global Solution of Shuffling-Type Gradient Algorithms · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On the Convergence to a Global Solution of Shuffling-Type Gradient Algorithms · NeurIPS 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Nesterov Accelerated Shuffling Gradient Method for Convex Optimization · ICML 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
finite-sum optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Nesterov Accelerated Shuffling Gradient Method for Convex Optimization · ICML 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
first-order methods |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Nesterov Accelerated Shuffling Gradient Method for Convex Optimization · ICML 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods › gradient-based optimization › accelerated gradient methods
nesterov acceleration |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Nesterov Accelerated Shuffling Gradient Method for Convex Optimization · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization
momentum methods |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | SMG: A Shuffling Gradient-Based Method with Momentum · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic gradient methods
shuffling gradient method |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | SMG: A Shuffling Gradient-Based Method with Momentum · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient methods |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | SMG: A Shuffling Gradient-Based Method with Momentum · ICML 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic gradient descent · 1.4shuffling estimator · 0.8self-supervised learning · 0.8inception block · 0.8hypergradient estimation · 0.8dilated convolution · 0.8contrastive learning · 0.8over-parameterization analysis · 0.7shuffling sampling · 0.6nesterov acceleration · 0.6variance reduction · 0.5shuffling strategy · 0.5momentum technique · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Improving Time Series Encoding with Noise-Aware Self-Supervised Learning and an Efficient EncoderabstractIn this work, we investigate the time series representation learning problem using self-supervised techniques. Contrastive learning is well-known in this area as it is a powerful method for extracting information from the series and generating task-appropriate representations. Despite its proficiency in capturing time series characteristics, these techniques often overlook a critical factor - the inherent noise in this type of data, a consideration usually emphasized in general time series analysis. Moreover, there is a notable absence of attention to developing efficient yet lightweight encoder architectures, with an undue focus on delivering contrastive losses. Our work address these gaps by proposing an innovative training strategy that promotes consistent representation learning, accounting for the presence of noise-prone signals in natural time series. Furthermore, we propose an encoder architecture that incorporates dilated convolution within the Inception block, resulting in a scalable and robust network with a wide receptive field. Experimental findings underscore the effectiveness of our method, consistently outperforming state-of-the-art approaches across various tasks, including forecasting, classification, and abnormality detection. Notably, our method attains the top rank in over two-thirds of the classification UCR datasets, utilizing only 40% of the parameters compared to the second-best approach. Duy A. Nguyen, Trang H. Tran, Hieu H. Pham 0001, Phi-Le Nguyen, Lam M. Nguyen |
ICDM | 2 |
| 2024 | Shuffling Gradient-Based Methods for Nonconvex-Concave Minimax OptimizationabstractThis paper aims at developing novel shuffling gradient-based methods for tackling two classes of minimax problems: nonconvex-linear and nonconvex-strongly concave settings. The first algorithm addresses the nonconvex-linear minimax model and achieves the state-of-the-art oracle complexity typically observed in nonconvex optimization. It also employs a new shuffling estimator for the ``hyper-gradient'', departing from standard shuffling techniques in optimization. The second method consists of two variants: semi-shuffling and full-shuffling schemes. These variants tackle the nonconvex-strongly concave minimax setting. We establish their oracle complexity bounds under standard assumptions, which, to our best knowledge, are the best-known for this specific setting. Numerical examples demonstrate the performance of our algorithms and compare them with two other methods. Our results show that the new methods achieve comparable performance with SGD, supporting the potential of incorporating shuffling strategies into minimax algorithms. Quoc Tran-Dinh, Trang H. Tran, Lam M. Nguyen |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2023 | On the Convergence to a Global Solution of Shuffling-Type Gradient AlgorithmsabstractStochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithm is the method of choice in many machine learning tasks thanks to its scalability and efficiency in dealing with large-scale problems. In this paper, we focus on the shuffling version of SGD which matches the mainstream practical heuristics. We show the convergence to a global solution of shuffling SGD for a class of non-convex functions under over-parameterized settings. Our analysis employs more relaxed non-convex assumptions than previous literature. Nevertheless, we maintain the desired computational complexity as shuffling SGD has achieved in the general convex setting. Lam M. Nguyen, Trang H. Tran |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2022 | Nesterov Accelerated Shuffling Gradient Method for Convex OptimizationabstractIn this paper, we propose Nesterov Accelerated Shuffling Gradient (NASG), a new algorithm for the convex finite-sum minimization problems. Our method integrates the traditional Nesterov’s acceleration momentum with different shuffling sampling schemes. We show that our algorithm has an improved rate of $\Ocal(1/T)$ using unified shuffling schemes, where $T$ is the number of epochs. This rate is better than that of any other shuffling gradient methods in convex regime. Our convergence analysis does not require an assumption on bounded domain or a bounded gradient condition. For randomized shuffling schemes, we improve the convergence bound further. When employing some initial condition, we show that our method converges faster near the small neighborhood of the solution. Numerical simulations demonstrate the efficiency of our algorithm. Trang H. Tran, Katya Scheinberg, Lam M. Nguyen |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | SMG: A Shuffling Gradient-Based Method with MomentumabstractWe combine two advanced ideas widely used in optimization for machine learning: \textit{shuffling} strategy and \textit{momentum} technique to develop a novel shuffling gradient-based method with momentum, coined \textbf{S}huffling \textbf{M}omentum \textbf{G}radient (SMG), for non-convex finite-sum optimization problems. While our method is inspired by momentum techniques, its update is fundamentally different from existing momentum-based methods. We establish state-of-the-art convergence rates of SMG for any shuffling strategy using either constant or diminishing learning rate under standard assumptions (i.e. \textit{$L$-smoothness} and \textit{bounded variance}). When the shuffling strategy is fixed, we develop another new algorithm that is similar to existing momentum methods, and prove the same convergence rates for this algorithm under the $L$-smoothness and bounded gradient assumptions. We demonstrate our algorithms via numerical simulations on standard datasets and compare them with existing shuffling methods. Our tests have shown encouraging performance of the new algorithms. Trang H. Tran, Lam M. Nguyen, Quoc Tran-Dinh |
ICML | 1 |