EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Truc Lam Bui
dblp:279/4255
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Concurrent programming · 67% Program verification · 33% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Computational complexity · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Concurrent programming
memory models |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The reads-from equivalence for the TSO and PSO memory models · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2021 |
Program verification › model checking
stateless model checking |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The reads-from equivalence for the TSO and PSO memory models · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2021 |
Concurrent programming › memory models › weak memory models
TSO and PSO |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The reads-from equivalence for the TSO and PSO memory models · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2021 |
Computational complexity › constraint satisfaction
consistency checking |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | The reads-from equivalence for the TSO and PSO memory models · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
model checking · 1.0equivalence checking · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | The reads-from equivalence for the TSO and PSO memory modelsabstractThe verification of concurrent programs remains an open challenge due to the non-determinism in inter-process communication. One recurring algorithmic problem in this challenge is the consistency verification of concurrent executions. In particular, consistency verification under a reads-from map allows to compute the reads-from (RF) equivalence between concurrent traces, with direct applications to areas such as Stateless Model Checking (SMC). Importantly, the RF equivalence was recently shown to be coarser than the standard Mazurkiewicz equivalence, leading to impressive scalability improvements for SMC under SC (sequential consistency). However, for the relaxed memory models of TSO and PSO (total/partial store order), the algorithmic problem of deciding the RF equivalence, as well as its impact on SMC, has been elusive. In this work we solve the algorithmic problem of consistency verification for the TSO and PSO memory models given a reads-from map, denoted VTSO-rf and VPSO-rf, respectively. For an execution of n events over k threads and d variables, we establish novel bounds that scale as n k +1 for TSO and as n k +1 · min( n k 2 , 2 k · d ) for PSO. Moreover, based on our solution to these problems, we develop an SMC algorithm under TSO and PSO that uses the RF equivalence. The algorithm is exploration-optimal , in the sense that it is guaranteed to explore each class of the RF partitioning exactly once, and spends polynomial time per class when k is bounded. Finally, we implement all our algorithms in the SMC tool Nidhugg, and perform a large number of experiments over benchmarks from existing literature. Our experimental results show that our algorithms for VTSO-rf and VPSO-rf provide significant scalability improvements over standard alternatives. Moreover, when used for SMC, the RF partitioning is often much coarser than the standard Shasha-Snir partitioning for TSO/PSO, which yields a significant speedup in the model checking task. Truc Lam Bui, Krishnendu Chatterjee, Tushar Gautam, Andreas Pavlogiannis, Viktor Toman |
Proc. ACM Program. Lang. | 1 |