Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ruben van Baaren

dblp:279/5648 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Routing and switching · 87% Network measurement and analytics · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Routing and switching › inter-domain routing
BGP
0.412020
Evaluating RPKI ROV identification methodologies in automatically generated mininet topologies · CoNEXT 2020
Routing and switching › inter-domain routing › inter-domain routing security › RPKI
route origin validation
0.412020
Evaluating RPKI ROV identification methodologies in automatically generated mininet topologies · CoNEXT 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

topology generation · 0.4mininet emulation · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Evaluating RPKI ROV identification methodologies in automatically generated mininet topologies
abstract
The deployment of the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) is currently gaining traction within the operator community and so are measurement methodologies trying to measure the current deployment status. These methodologies, which are attempting to infer Autonomous Systems (ASs) performing Route Origin Validation (ROV), are applied onto real world data but validation of the results is usually hard as no ground-truth dataset exists. We propose to build such a dataset with the help of Mininet in a way that ROV measurement methodologies can be evaluated within a testbed in which filtering ASs are known to the experimenter. The Mininet topology generator will not only be specific for RPKI measurements but could be used also as an evaluation testbed for any kind of measurements that require a ground-truth dataset. Our framework is fed with real world BGP collector data, renders an abstraction of the acquired topology graph and translates it into a Mininet topology. In our scenario, RPKI filtering is deployed within the topology such that the testbed can later on be used to evaluate existing RPKI ROV measurement methodologies. We therefore plan to contribute an automated Mininet topology generator and insights into the accuracy of current ROV identification methodologies.
Nils Rodday, Ruben van Baaren, Luuk Hendriks, Roland van Rijswijk-Deij, Aiko Pras, Gabi Dreo Rodosek
CoNEXT2