EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Cheng-Hao Liu
dblp:279/6331
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Generative modeling · 61% Language models and text generation · 16% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 13% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 93% Computational science and engineering · 7% |
Topics — the 22 heaviest of 23, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
2.4 | 3 | 2025 | Steering Masked Discrete Diffusion Models via Discrete Denoising Posterior Prediction · ICLR 2025 Iterated Denoising Energy Matching for Sampling from Boltzmann Densities · ICML 2024 Diffusion Generative Flow Samplers: Improving learning signals through partial trajectory optimization · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative flow networks |
1.9 | 3 | 2025 | Flow Factorization for Efficient Generative Flow Networks · AAAI 2025 RGFN: Synthesizable Molecular Generation Using GFlowNets · NeurIPS 2024 Diffusion Generative Flow Samplers: Improving learning signals through partial trajectory optimization · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
diffusion sampling |
1.5 | 2 | 2024 | Iterated Denoising Energy Matching for Sampling from Boltzmann Densities · ICML 2024 Diffusion Generative Flow Samplers: Improving learning signals through partial trajectory optimization · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
1.5 | 2 | 2024 | Sequence-Augmented SE(3)-Flow Matching For Conditional Protein Generation · NeurIPS 2024 SE(3)-Stochastic Flow Matching for Protein Backbone Generation · ICLR 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Steering Masked Discrete Diffusion Models via Discrete Denoising Posterior Prediction · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
discrete diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Steering Masked Discrete Diffusion Models via Discrete Denoising Posterior Prediction · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
model steering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Steering Masked Discrete Diffusion Models via Discrete Denoising Posterior Prediction · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding › decoding strategy
probabilistic sampling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Flow Factorization for Efficient Generative Flow Networks · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from human feedback |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Steering Masked Discrete Diffusion Models via Discrete Denoising Posterior Prediction · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
stochastic policy learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Flow Factorization for Efficient Generative Flow Networks · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
boltzmann density sampling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Iterated Denoising Energy Matching for Sampling from Boltzmann Densities · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
molecular generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | RGFN: Synthesizable Molecular Generation Using GFlowNets · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
partition function estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Diffusion Generative Flow Samplers: Improving learning signals through partial trajectory optimization · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › flow matching
protein backbone generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SE(3)-Stochastic Flow Matching for Protein Backbone Generation · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
sampling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Diffusion Generative Flow Samplers: Improving learning signals through partial trajectory optimization · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
score matching |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Iterated Denoising Energy Matching for Sampling from Boltzmann Densities · ICML 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
generative modeling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SE(3)-Stochastic Flow Matching for Protein Backbone Generation · ICLR 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
molecule discovery |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | RGFN: Synthesizable Molecular Generation Using GFlowNets · NeurIPS 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
protein structure design |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SE(3)-Stochastic Flow Matching for Protein Backbone Generation · ICLR 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
protein structure generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Sequence-Augmented SE(3)-Flow Matching For Conditional Protein Generation · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › neural language model
protein language model |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Sequence-Augmented SE(3)-Flow Matching For Conditional Protein Generation · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computational science and engineering › computational chemistry
molecular simulation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Iterated Denoising Energy Matching for Sampling from Boltzmann Densities · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
GFlowNets · 2.3stochastic optimization · 1.5simulation-free training · 1.5riemannian optimal transport · 1.5SE(3) flow matching · 1.5state flow and edge allocation factorization · 0.9discrete denoising posterior prediction · 0.9bifurcated architecture · 0.9bayesian posterior inference · 0.9stochastic process control · 0.8reinforcement fine-tuning · 0.8protein language model · 0.8geometric transformer · 0.8flow matching · 0.8docking · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Flow Factorization for Efficient Generative Flow NetworksabstractGenerative Flow Networks (GFlowNets) is a new family of probabilistic samplers for generating objects under an unnormalized reward distribution. It has emerged as a promising framework for learning stochastic policies that generate high-quality and diverse discrete objects proportional to their rewards, surpassing traditional reward-maximizing reinforcement learning methods. However, existing GFlowNets often suffer with data efficiency due to the direct parameterization of edge flows or dependence on backward policies that are challenging to specify or optimize, especially in high-dimensional action spaces. While the recent development of GFlowNets has primarily focused on developing alternative loss functions, we introduce a novel approach by exploring enhanced flow representations from an architectural perspective. In this paper, we propose to factorize the conventional edge flows into separate state flow and edge-based allocation streams. By introducing an effective method to synergistically combine these two streams to estimate the flows, we develop Bifurcated Generative Flow Networks (BN), a practical implementation to improve learning efficiency. We conduct extensive experiments on various standard benchmarks, and results show that BN significantly improves learning efficiency and effectiveness compared to state-of-the-art baselines. Jiashun Liu, Cheng-Hao Liu, Dianbo Liu, Qingpeng Cai 0001, Ling Pan |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2025 | Steering Masked Discrete Diffusion Models via Discrete Denoising Posterior PredictionabstractGenerative modeling of discrete data underlies important applications spanning text-based agents like ChatGPT to the design of the very building blocks of life in protein sequences. However, application domains need to exert control over the generated data by steering the generative process—typically via RLHF—to satisfy a specified property, reward, or affinity metric. In this paper, we study the problem of steering Masked Diffusion Models (MDMs), a recent class of discrete diffusion models that offer a compelling alternative to traditional autoregressive models. We introduce Discrete Denoising Posterior Prediction (DDPP), a novel framework that casts the task of steering pretrained MDMs as a problem of probabilistic inference by learning to sample from a target Bayesian posterior. Our DDPP framework leads to a family of three novel objectives that are all simulation-free, and thus scalable while applying to general non-differentiable reward functions. Empirically, we instantiate DDPP by steering MDMs to perform class-conditional pixel-level image modeling, RLHF-based alignment of MDMs using text based rewards, and finetuning protein language models to generate more diverse secondary structures and shorter proteins. We substantiate our designs via wet-lab validation, where we observe transient expression of reward-optimized protein sequences. Jarrid Rector-Brooks, Mohsin Hasan, Zhangzhi Peng, Cheng-Hao Liu, Sarthak Mittal, Nouha Dziri, Michael M. Bronstein, Pranam Chatterjee, Alexander Tong 0001, Joey Bose |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2024 | SE(3)-Stochastic Flow Matching for Protein Backbone GenerationabstractThe computational design of novel protein structures has the potential to impact numerous scientific disciplines greatly. Toward this goal, we introduce \foldflow, a series of novel generative models of increasing modeling power based on the flow-matching paradigm over $3\mathrm{D}$ rigid motions---i.e. the group $\mathrm{SE(3)}$---enabling accurate modeling of protein backbones. We first introduce $\text{FoldFlow-Base}$, a simulation-free approach to learning deterministic continuous-time dynamics and matching invariant target distributions on $\mathrm{SE(3)}$. We next accelerate training by incorporating Riemannian optimal transport to create $\text{FoldFlow-OT}$, leading to the construction of both more simple and stable flows. Finally, we design \foldflowsfm, coupling both Riemannian OT and simulation-free training to learn stochastic continuous-time dynamics over $\mathrm{SE(3)}$. Our family of $\text{FoldFlow}$, generative models offers several key advantages over previous approaches to the generative modeling of proteins: they are more stable and faster to train than diffusion-based approaches, and our models enjoy the ability to map any invariant source distribution to any invariant target distribution over $\mathrm{SE(3)}$. Empirically, we validate $\text{FoldFlow}$, on protein backbone generation of up to $300$ amino acids leading to high-quality designable, diverse, and novel samples. Joey Bose, Tara Akhound-Sadegh, Guillaume Huguet, Kilian Fatras, Jarrid Rector-Brooks, Cheng-Hao Liu, Andrei Cristian Nica, Maksym Korablyov, Michael M. Bronstein, Alexander Tong 0001 |
ICLR | 6 |
| 2024 | Diffusion Generative Flow Samplers: Improving learning signals through partial trajectory optimizationabstractWe tackle the problem of sampling from intractable high-dimensional density functions, a fundamental task that often appears in machine learning and statistics.
We extend recent sampling-based approaches that leverage controlled stochastic processes to model approximate samples from these target densities.
The main drawback of these approaches is that the training objective requires full trajectories to compute, resulting in sluggish credit assignment issues due to use of entire trajectories and a learning signal present only at the terminal time.
In this work, we present Diffusion Generative Flow Samplers (DGFS), a sampling-based framework where the learning process can be tractably broken down into short partial trajectory segments, via parameterizing an additional ``flow function''.
Our method takes inspiration from the theory developed for generative flow networks (GFlowNets), allowing us to make use of intermediate learning signals.
Through various challenging experiments, we demonstrate that DGFS achieves more accurate estimates of the normalization constant than closely-related prior methods. Dinghuai Zhang, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Cheng-Hao Liu, Aaron C. Courville, Yoshua Bengio |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2024 | Iterated Denoising Energy Matching for Sampling from Boltzmann DensitiesabstractEfficiently generating statistically independent samples from an unnormalized probability distribution, such as equilibrium samples of many-body systems, is a foundational problem in science. In this paper, we propose Iterated Denoising Energy Matching (iDEM), an iterative algorithm that uses a novel stochastic score matching objective leveraging solely the energy function and its gradient---and no data samples---to train a diffusion-based sampler. Specifically, iDEM alternates between (I) sampling regions of high model density from a diffusion-based sampler and (II) using these samples in our stochastic matching objective to further improve the sampler. iDEM is scalable to high dimensions as the inner matching objective, is *simulation-free*, and requires no MCMC samples. Moreover, by leveraging the fast mode mixing behavior of diffusion, iDEM smooths out the energy landscape enabling efficient exploration and learning of an amortized sampler. We evaluate iDEM on a suite of tasks ranging from standard synthetic energy functions to invariant $n$-body particle systems. We show that the proposed approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on all metrics and trains $2-5\times$ faster, which allows it to be the first method to train using energy on the challenging $55$-particle Lennard-Jones system. Tara Akhound-Sadegh, Jarrid Rector-Brooks, Joey Bose, Sarthak Mittal, Pablo Lemos, Cheng-Hao Liu, Marcin Sendera, Siamak Ravanbakhsh, Gauthier Gidel, Yoshua Bengio, Nikolay Malkin, Alexander Tong 0001 |
ICML | 6 |
| 2024 | Sequence-Augmented SE(3)-Flow Matching For Conditional Protein GenerationabstractProteins are essential for almost all biological processes and derive their diverse functions from complex $3 \rm D$ structures, which are in turn determined by their amino acid sequences.
In this paper, we exploit the rich biological inductive bias of amino acid sequences and introduce FoldFlow++, a novel sequence-conditioned $\text{SE}(3)$-equivariant flow matching model for protein structure generation. FoldFlow++ presents substantial new architectural features over the previous FoldFlow family of models including a protein large language model to encode sequence, a new multi-modal fusion trunk that combines structure and sequence representations, and a geometric transformer based decoder. To increase
diversity and novelty of generated samples -- crucial for de-novo drug design -- we
train FoldFlow++ at scale on a new dataset
that is an order of magnitude
larger than PDB datasets of prior works, containing both known proteins in PDB and high-quality synthetic structures achieved through filtering. We further demonstrate the ability to align FoldFlow++ to arbitrary rewards, e.g. increasing secondary structures diversity, by introducing a Reinforced Finetuning (ReFT) objective. We empirically observe that FoldFlow++ outperforms previous state-of-the-art protein structure-based generative models, improving over RFDiffusion in terms of unconditional generation across all metrics including designability, diversity, and novelty across all protein lengths, as well as exhibiting generalization on the task of equilibrium conformation sampling. Finally, we demonstrate that a fine-tuned FoldFlow++ makes progress on challenging conditional design tasks such as designing scaffolds for the VHH nanobody. Guillaume Huguet, James Vuckovic, Kilian Fatras, Eric Thibodeau-Laufer, Pablo Lemos, Riashat Islam, Cheng-Hao Liu, Jarrid Rector-Brooks, Tara Akhound-Sadegh, Michael M. Bronstein, Alexander Tong 0001, Joey Bose |
NeurIPS | 7 |
| 2024 | RGFN: Synthesizable Molecular Generation Using GFlowNetsabstractGenerative models hold great promise for small molecule discovery, significantly increasing the size of search space compared to traditional in silico screening libraries. However, most existing machine learning methods for small molecule generation suffer from poor synthesizability of candidate compounds, making experimental validation difficult. In this paper we propose Reaction-GFlowNet (RGFN), an extension of the GFlowNet framework that operates directly in the space of chemical reactions, thereby allowing out-of-the-box synthesizability while maintaining comparable quality of generated candidates. We demonstrate that with the proposed set of reactions and building blocks, it is possible to obtain a search space of molecules orders of magnitude larger than existing screening libraries coupled with low cost of synthesis. We also show that the approach scales to very large fragment libraries, further increasing the number of potential molecules. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach across a range of oracle models, including pretrained proxy models and GPU-accelerated docking. Michal Koziarski, Andrei Rekesh, Dmytro Shevchuk, Almer van der Sloot, Piotr Gainski, Yoshua Bengio, Cheng-Hao Liu, Mike Tyers, Robert A. Batey |
NeurIPS | 7 |