Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Katrin Renz
dblp:279/6579
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Autonomous driving · 61% Reinforcement learning · 20% Robot navigation and mapping · 11% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Autonomous driving
closed-loop driving |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SimLingo: Vision-Only Closed-Loop Autonomous Driving with Language-Action Alignment · CVPR 2025 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
driving scene understanding |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DriveLM: Driving with Graph Visual Question Answering · ECCV (52) 2024 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
end-to-end driving |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | TransFuser: Imitation With Transformer-Based Sensor Fusion for Autonomous Driving · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | TransFuser: Imitation With Transformer-Based Sensor Fusion for Autonomous Driving · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
sensor fusion |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | TransFuser: Imitation With Transformer-Based Sensor Fusion for Autonomous Driving · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
robust imitation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | KING: Generating Safety-Critical Driving Scenarios for Robust Imitation via Kinematics Gradients · ECCV (38) 2022 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
safety-critical scenario generation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | KING: Generating Safety-Critical Driving Scenarios for Robust Imitation via Kinematics Gradients · ECCV (38) 2022 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal understanding |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | SimLingo: Vision-Only Closed-Loop Autonomous Driving with Language-Action Alignment · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | DriveLM: Driving with Graph Visual Question Answering · ECCV (52) 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
vision-language model · 0.9large language model · 0.9transformer · 0.7self-attention · 0.7LiDAR-camera fusion · 0.7kinematics gradients · 0.6adversarial scenario generation · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | SimLingo: Vision-Only Closed-Loop Autonomous Driving with Language-Action AlignmentabstractIntegrating large language models (LLMs) into autonomous driving has attracted significant attention with the hope of improving generalization and explainability. However, existing methods often focus on either driving or vision-language understanding but achieving both high driving performance and extensive language understanding remains challenging. In addition, the dominant approach to tackle vision-language understanding is using visual question answering. However, for autonomous driving, this is only useful if it is aligned with the action space. Otherwise, the model’s answers could be inconsistent with its behavior. Therefore, we propose a model that can handle three different tasks: (1) closed-loop driving, (2) vision-language understanding, and (3) language-action alignment. Our model SimLingo is based on a vision language model (VLM) and works using only camera, excluding expensive sensors like LiDAR. SimLingo obtains state-of-the-art performance on the widely used CARLA simulator on the Bench2Drive benchmark and is the winning entry at the CARLA challenge 2024. Additionally, we achieve strong results in a wide variety of language-related tasks while maintaining high driving performance. Project page: https://katrinrenz.de/simlingo Katrin Renz, Long Chen 0015, Elahe Arani, Oleg Sinavski |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2024 | DriveLM: Driving with Graph Visual Question Answering
Chonghao Sima, Katrin Renz, Kashyap Chitta, Li Chen 0008, Hanxue Zhang, Chengen Xie, Jens Beißwenger, Ping Luo 0002, Andreas Geiger 0001, Hongyang Li 0001 |
ECCV (52) | 2 |
| 2024 | Can Vehicle Motion Planning Generalize to Realistic Long-tail Scenarios?abstractReal-world autonomous driving systems must make safe decisions in the face of rare and diverse traffic scenarios. Current state-of-the-art planners are mostly evaluated on real-world datasets like nuScenes (open-loop) or nuPlan (closed-loop). In particular nuPlan seems to be an expressive evaluation method since it is based on real-world data and closed-loop, yet it mostly covers basic driving scenarios. This makes it difficult to judge a planner’s capabilities to generalize to rarely-seen situations. Therefore, we propose a novel closed-loop benchmark interPlan containing several edge cases and challenging driving scenarios. We assess existing state-of-the-art planners on our benchmark and show that neither rule-based nor learning-based planners can safely navigate the interPlan scenarios.A recently evolving direction is the usage of foundation models like large language models (LLM) to handle generalization. We evaluate an LLM-only planner and introduce a novel hybrid planner that combines an LLM-based behavior planner with a rule-based motion planner that achieves state-of-the-art performance on our benchmark. Marcel Hallgarten, Julián Zapata, Martin Stoll, Katrin Renz, Andreas Zell |
IROS | 4 |
| 2023 | TransFuser: Imitation With Transformer-Based Sensor Fusion for Autonomous DrivingabstractHow should we integrate representations from complementary sensors for autonomous driving? Geometry-based fusion has shown promise for perception (e.g., object detection, motion forecasting). However, in the context of end-to-end driving, we find that imitation learning based on existing sensor fusion methods underperforms in complex driving scenarios with a high density of dynamic agents. Therefore, we propose TransFuser, a mechanism to integrate image and LiDAR representations using self-attention. Our approach uses transformer modules at multiple resolutions to fuse perspective view and bird's eye view feature maps. We experimentally validate its efficacy on a challenging new benchmark with long routes and dense traffic, as well as the official leaderboard of the CARLA urban driving simulator. At the time of submission, TransFuser outperforms all prior work on the CARLA leaderboard in terms of driving score by a large margin. Compared to geometry-based fusion, TransFuser reduces the average collisions per kilometer by 48%. Kashyap Chitta, Aditya Prakash 0001, Bernhard Jaeger, Zehao Yu 0002, Katrin Renz, Andreas Geiger 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 5 |
| 2022 | KING: Generating Safety-Critical Driving Scenarios for Robust Imitation via Kinematics Gradients
Niklas Hanselmann, Katrin Renz, Kashyap Chitta, Apratim Bhattacharyya, Andreas Geiger 0001 |
ECCV (38) | 2 |
| 2021 | Sign Language Segmentation with Temporal Convolutional NetworksabstractThe objective of this work is to determine the location of temporal boundaries between signs in continuous sign language videos. Our approach employs 3D convolutional neural network representations with iterative temporal segment refinement to resolve ambiguities between sign boundary cues. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on the BSLCORPUS, PHOENIX14 and BSL-1K datasets, showing considerable improvement over the state of the art and the ability to generalise to new signers, languages and domains. Katrin Renz, Nicolaj C. Stache, Samuel Albanie, Gül Varol |
ICASSP | 1 |