Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Adrian Kochsiek
dblp:279/8734
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-1972-1425ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 85% Question answering and dialogue systems · 15% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Knowledge graphs · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge graphs
link prediction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Sequence-to-Sequence Knowledge Graph Completion and Question Answering · ACL (1) 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Parallel Training of Knowledge Graph Embedding Models: A Comparison of Techniques · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
parallelization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Parallel Training of Knowledge Graph Embedding Models: A Comparison of Techniques · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021 |
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph embedding |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Parallel Training of Knowledge Graph Embedding Models: A Comparison of Techniques · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
knowledge base question answering |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Sequence-to-Sequence Knowledge Graph Completion and Question Answering · ACL (1) 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 1.1sequence-to-sequence model · 1.1knowledge graph embedding · 1.1stratification · 1.0random partitioning · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Sequence-to-Sequence Knowledge Graph Completion and Question AnsweringabstractKnowledge graph embedding (KGE) models represent each entity and relation of a knowledge graph (KG) with low-dimensional embedding vectors.These methods have recently been applied to KG link prediction and question answering over incomplete KGs (KGQA).KGEs typically create an embedding for each entity in the graph, which results in large model sizes on real-world graphs with millions of entities.For downstream tasks these atomic entity representations often need to be integrated into a multi stage pipeline, limiting their utility.We show that an off-the-shelf encoder-decoder Transformer model can serve as a scalable and versatile KGE model obtaining state-of-the-art results for KG link prediction and incomplete KG question answering.We achieve this by posing KG link prediction as a sequence-tosequence task and exchange the triple scoring approach taken by prior KGE methods with autoregressive decoding.Such a simple but powerful method reduces the model size up to 98% compared to conventional KGE models while keeping inference time tractable.After finetuning this model on the task of KGQA over incomplete KGs, our approach outperforms baselines on multiple large-scale datasets without extensive hyperparameter tuning. 1 Apoorv Saxena, Adrian Kochsiek, Rainer Gemulla |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2022 | Start Small, Think Big: On Hyperparameter Optimization for Large-Scale Knowledge Graph Embeddings
Adrian Kochsiek, Fritz Niesel, Rainer Gemulla |
ECML/PKDD (2) | 1 |
| 2021 | Parallel Training of Knowledge Graph Embedding Models: A Comparison of TechniquesabstractKnowledge graph embedding (KGE) models represent the entities and relations of a knowledge graph (KG) using dense continuous representations called embeddings. KGE methods have recently gained traction for tasks such as knowledge graph completion and reasoning as well as to provide suitable entity representations for downstream learning tasks. While a large part of the available literature focuses on small KGs, a number of frameworks that are able to train KGE models for large-scale KGs by parallelization across multiple GPUs or machines have recently been proposed. So far, the benefits and drawbacks of the various parallelization techniques have not been studied comprehensively. In this paper, we report on an experimental study in which we presented, re-implemented in a common computational framework, investigated, and improved the available techniques. We found that the evaluation methodologies used in prior work are often not comparable and can be misleading, and that most of currently implemented training methods tend to have a negative impact on embedding quality. We propose a simple but effective variation of the stratification technique used by PyTorch BigGraph for mitigation. Moreover, basic random partitioning can be an effective or even the best-performing choice when combined with suitable sampling techniques. Ultimately, we found that efficient and effective parallel training of large-scale KGE models is indeed achievable but requires a careful choice of techniques. Adrian Kochsiek, Rainer Gemulla |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 1 |