EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Abhijith Jayakumar
dblp:279/9897
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-5297-8033ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 39% Learning theory · 24% Generative modeling · 17% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Energy systems and smart grids · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
exponential family |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Finite Sample Bounds for Learning with Score Matching · COLT 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Finite Sample Bounds for Learning with Score Matching · COLT 2026 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
score matching |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Finite Sample Bounds for Learning with Score Matching · COLT 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical learning theory |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Finite Sample Bounds for Learning with Score Matching · COLT 2026 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
structure learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Finite Sample Bounds for Learning with Score Matching · COLT 2026 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models › bayesian deep learning
bayesian neural networks |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Optimization Proxies using Limited Labeled Data and Training Time - A Semi-Supervised Bayesian Neural Network Approach · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
constrained optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Optimization Proxies using Limited Labeled Data and Training Time - A Semi-Supervised Bayesian Neural Network Approach · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Optimization Proxies using Limited Labeled Data and Training Time - A Semi-Supervised Bayesian Neural Network Approach · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › energy-based model
energy-based learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning of Discrete Graphical Models with Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › structure learning
graphical model learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning of Discrete Graphical Models with Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2020 |
Energy systems and smart grids
power system operation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Optimization Proxies using Limited Labeled Data and Training Time - A Semi-Supervised Bayesian Neural Network Approach · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
semi-supervised learning · 1.7bayesian neural network · 1.7score matching · 1.0non-asymptotic analysis · 1.0neural network function approximation · 0.4interaction screening estimator · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Finite Sample Bounds for Learning with Score MatchingabstractLearning of continuous exponential family distributions with unbounded support remains an important area of research for both theory and applications in high-dimensional statistics. In recent years, score matching has become a widely used method for learning exponential families with continuous variables due to its computational ease when compared against maximum likelihood estimation. However, theoretical understanding of the statistical properties of score matching is still lacking. In this work, we provide a non-asymptotic sample complexity analysis for learning the structure of exponential families of polynomials with score matching. The derived sample bounds show a polynomial dependence on the model dimension. These bounds are the first of its kind, as all prior work has shown only asymptotic bounds on the sample complexity. Devin Smedira, Abhijith Jayakumar, Sidhant Misra, Marc Vuffray, Andrey Y. Lokhov |
COLT | 2 |
| 2025 | Optimization Proxies using Limited Labeled Data and Training Time - A Semi-Supervised Bayesian Neural Network ApproachabstractConstrained optimization problems arise in various engineering systems such as inventory management and power grids. Standard deep neural network (DNN) based machine learning proxies are ineffective in practical settings where labeled data is scarce and training times are limited. We propose a semi-supervised Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) based optimization proxy for this complex regime, wherein training commences in a sandwiched fashion, alternating between a supervised learning step for minimizing cost, and an unsupervised learning step for enforcing constraint feasibility. We show that the proposed semi-supervised BNN outperforms DNN architectures on important non-convex constrained optimization problems from energy network operations, achieving up to a tenfold reduction in expected maximum equality gap and halving the inequality gaps. Further, the BNN's ability to provide posterior samples is leveraged to construct practically meaningful probabilistic confidence bounds on performance using a limited validation data, unlike prior methods. Parikshit Pareek, Abhijith Jayakumar, Kaarthik Sundar, Sidhant Misra, Deepjyoti Deka |
ICML | 2 |
| 2022 | Quantum Algorithm Implementations for BeginnersabstractAs quantum computers become available to the general public, the need has arisen to train a cohort of quantum programmers, many of whom have been developing classical computer programs for most of their careers. While currently available quantum computers have less than 100 qubits, quantum computing hardware is widely expected to grow in terms of qubit count, quality, and connectivity. This review aims at explaining the principles of quantum programming, which are quite different from classical programming, with straightforward algebra that makes understanding of the underlying fascinating quantum mechanical principles optional. We give an introduction to quantum computing algorithms and their implementation on real quantum hardware. We survey 20 different quantum algorithms, attempting to describe each in a succinct and self-contained fashion. We show how these algorithms can be implemented on IBM’s quantum computer, and in each case, we discuss the results of the implementation with respect to differences between the simulator and the actual hardware runs. This article introduces computer scientists, physicists, and engineers to quantum algorithms and provides a blueprint for their implementations. Abhijith Jayakumar, Adetokunbo Adedoyin, John Ambrosiano, Petr M. Anisimov, William Casper, Gopinath Chennupati, Carleton Coffrin, Hristo N. Djidjev, David Gunter, Satish Karra, Nathan Lemons, Shizeng Lin, Alexander Malyzhenkov, David Mascarenas, Susan M. Mniszewski, Balasubramanya T. Nadiga, Daniel O'Malley, Diane Oyen, Scott Pakin, Lakshman Prasad, Randy Roberts, Phillip Romero, Nandakishore Santhi, Nikolai Sinitsyn, Pieter J. Swart, Jim Wendelberger, Boram Yoon, Richard J. Zamora, Wei Zhu 0011, Stephan J. Eidenbenz, Andreas Bärtschi, Patrick J. Coles, Marc Vuffray, Andrey Y. Lokhov |
ACM Trans. Quantum Comput. | 1 |
| 2020 | Learning of Discrete Graphical Models with Neural NetworksabstractGraphical models are widely used in science to represent joint probability distributions with an underlying conditional dependence structure. The inverse problem of learning a discrete graphical model given i.i.d samples from its joint distribution can be solved with near-optimal sample complexity using a convex optimization method known as Generalized Regularized Interaction Screening Estimator (GRISE). But the computational cost of GRISE becomes prohibitive when the energy function of the true graphical model has higher order terms. We introduce NeurISE, a neural net based algorithm for graphical model learning, to tackle this limitation of GRISE. We use neural nets as function approximators in an Interaction Screening objective function. The optimization of this objective then produces a neural-net representation for the conditionals of the graphical model. NeurISE algorithm is seen to be a better alternative to GRISE when the energy function of the true model has a high order with a high degree of symmetry. In these cases NeurISE is able to find the correct parsimonious representation for the conditionals without being fed any prior information about the true model. NeurISE can also be used to learn the underlying structure of the true model with some simple modifications to its training procedure. In addition, we also show a variant of NeurISE that can be used to learn a neural net representation for the full energy function of the true model. Abhijith Jayakumar, Andrey Y. Lokhov, Sidhant Misra, Marc Vuffray |
NeurIPS | 1 |