Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Timo Latvala
dblp:28/1096
· DBLP profile ↗
14ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 7 · 2 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 5Theory of computation · 5 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Automata and formal languages · 45% Automated reasoning and model checking · 28% Logic in computer science · 26% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking
bounded model checking |
0.1 | 2 | 2006 | Bounded Model Checking for Weak Alternating Büchi Automata · CAV 2006 Incremental and Complete Bounded Model Checking for Full PLTL · CAV 2005 |
Automata and formal languages
alternating automata |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Bounded Model Checking for Weak Alternating Büchi Automata · CAV 2006 |
Automata and formal languages › omega-automata
büchi automata |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Bounded Model Checking for Weak Alternating Büchi Automata · CAV 2006 |
Automata and formal languages › alternating automata
weak alternating automata |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Bounded Model Checking for Weak Alternating Büchi Automata · CAV 2006 |
Logic in computer science › temporal logic
linear temporal logic |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Incremental and Complete Bounded Model Checking for Full PLTL · CAV 2005 |
Logic in computer science
temporal logic |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Incremental and Complete Bounded Model Checking for Full PLTL · CAV 2005 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Towards Security-Explicit Formal Modelling of Safety-Critical Systems
Elena Troubitsyna, Linas Laibinis, Inna Vistbakka, Tuomas Kuismin, Dubravka Ilic, Timo Latvala |
SAFECOMP | 6 |
| 2015 | The Formal Derivation of Mode Logic for Autonomous Satellite Flight Formation
Anton Tarasyuk, Inna Vistbakka, Elena Troubitsyna, Timo Latvala |
SAFECOMP | 4 |
| 2013 | Formalisation of an Industrial Approach to Monitoring Critical Data
Yuliya Prokhorova, Elena Troubitsyna, Linas Laibinis, Dubravka Ilic, Timo Latvala |
SAFECOMP | 5 |
| 2013 | Developing mode-rich satellite software by refinement in Event-B
Alexei Iliasov, Elena Troubitsyna, Linas Laibinis, Alexander B. Romanovsky, Kimmo Varpaaniemi, Dubravka Ilic, Timo Latvala |
Sci. Comput. Program. | 7 |
| 2012 | Formal Development and Assessment of a Reconfigurable On-board Satellite System
Anton Tarasyuk, Inna Vistbakka, Elena Troubitsyna, Timo Latvala, Laura Nummila |
SAFECOMP | 4 |
| 2011 | Derivation and Formal Verification of a Mode Logic for Layered Control SystemsabstractModes are widely used to structure the behaviour of control systems. For many such systems, derivation and verification of a mode logic is challenging due to a large number of modes and complex mode transitions. In this paper we propose an approach to deriving, formalising and verifying consistency of a mode logic for fault tolerant control systems. We demonstrate how to use Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) to systematically derive the fault tolerance part of the mode logic. To tackle the problem of mode consistency, we propose a formalisation of the mode logic and mode consistency conditions for layered systems with reconfigurable components. We use our formalisation to develop and verify a mode-rich system by refinement in Event-B. Yuliya Prokhorova, Linas Laibinis, Elena Troubitsyna, Kimmo Varpaaniemi, Timo Latvala |
APSEC | 5 |
| 2010 | Developing Mode-Rich Satellite Software by Refinement in Event B
Alexei Iliasov, Elena Troubitsyna, Linas Laibinis, Alexander B. Romanovsky, Kimmo Varpaaniemi, Dubravka Ilic, Timo Latvala |
FMICS | 7 |
| 2010 | Verifying Mode Consistency for On-Board Satellite Software
Alexei Iliasov, Elena Troubitsyna, Linas Laibinis, Alexander B. Romanovsky, Kimmo Varpaaniemi, Pauli Väisänen, Dubravka Ilic, Timo Latvala |
SAFECOMP | 8 |
| 2006 | Bounded Model Checking for Weak Alternating Büchi Automata
Keijo Heljanko, Tommi A. Junttila, Misa Keinänen, Martin Lange 0001, Timo Latvala |
CAV | 5 |
| 2006 | Linear Encodings of Bounded LTL Model CheckingabstractWe consider the problem of bounded model checking (BMC) for linear temporal logic (LTL). We present several efficient encodings that have size linear in the bound. Furthermore, we show how the encodings can be extended to LTL with past operators (PLTL). The generalised encoding is still of linear size, but cannot detect minimal length counterexamples. By using the virtual unrolling technique minimal length counterexamples can be captured, however, the size of the encoding is quadratic in the specification. We also extend virtual unrolling to Buchi automata, enabling them to accept minimal length counterexamples. Our BMC encodings can be made incremental in order to benefit from incremental SAT technology. With fairly small modifications the incremental encoding can be further enhanced with a termination check, allowing us to prove properties with BMC. Experiments clearly show that our new encodings improve performance of BMC considerably, particularly in the case of the incremental encoding, and that they are very competitive for finding bugs. An analysis of the liveness-to-safety transformation reveals many similarities to the BMC encodings in this paper. Using the liveness-to-safety translation with BDD-based invariant checking results in an efficient method to find shortest counterexamples that complements the BMC-based approach. Armin Biere, Keijo Heljanko, Tommi A. Junttila, Timo Latvala, Viktor Schuppan |
Log. Methods Comput. Sci. | 4 |
| 2005 | Incremental and Complete Bounded Model Checking for Full PLTL
Keijo Heljanko, Tommi A. Junttila, Timo Latvala |
CAV | 3 |
| 2005 | Simple Is Better: Efficient Bounded Model Checking for Past LTL
Timo Latvala, Armin Biere, Keijo Heljanko, Tommi A. Junttila |
VMCAI | 1 |
| 2004 | Simple Bounded LTL Model Checking
Timo Latvala, Armin Biere, Keijo Heljanko, Tommi A. Junttila |
FMCAD | 1 |
| 2000 | Coping With Strong FairnessabstractWe consider the verification of linear temporal logic (LTL) properties of Petri nets, where the transitions can have both weak and strong fairness constraints. Allowing the transitions to have weak or strong fairness constraints simplifies the modeling of systems in many cases. We use the automata theoretic approach to model checking. To cope with the strong fairness constraints efficiently we employ Streett automata where appropriate. We present memory efficient algorithms for both the emptiness checking and counterexample generation problems for Streett automata. Timo Latvala, Keijo Heljanko |
Fundam. Informaticae | 1 |