Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Timo Latvala

dblp:28/1096 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
14ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 7 · 2 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 5Theory of computation · 5 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Automata and formal languages · 45% Automated reasoning and model checking · 28% Logic in computer science · 26%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking
bounded model checking
0.122006
Bounded Model Checking for Weak Alternating Büchi Automata · CAV 2006
Incremental and Complete Bounded Model Checking for Full PLTL · CAV 2005
Automata and formal languages
alternating automata
0.112006
Bounded Model Checking for Weak Alternating Büchi Automata · CAV 2006
Automata and formal languages › omega-automata
büchi automata
0.112006
Bounded Model Checking for Weak Alternating Büchi Automata · CAV 2006
Automata and formal languages › alternating automata
weak alternating automata
0.112006
Bounded Model Checking for Weak Alternating Büchi Automata · CAV 2006
Logic in computer science › temporal logic
linear temporal logic
0.112005
Incremental and Complete Bounded Model Checking for Full PLTL · CAV 2005
Logic in computer science
temporal logic
0.112005
Incremental and Complete Bounded Model Checking for Full PLTL · CAV 2005
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Towards Security-Explicit Formal Modelling of Safety-Critical Systems
Elena Troubitsyna, Linas Laibinis, Inna Vistbakka, Tuomas Kuismin, Dubravka Ilic, Timo Latvala
SAFECOMP6
2015 The Formal Derivation of Mode Logic for Autonomous Satellite Flight Formation
Anton Tarasyuk, Inna Vistbakka, Elena Troubitsyna, Timo Latvala
SAFECOMP4
2013 Formalisation of an Industrial Approach to Monitoring Critical Data
Yuliya Prokhorova, Elena Troubitsyna, Linas Laibinis, Dubravka Ilic, Timo Latvala
SAFECOMP5
2013 Developing mode-rich satellite software by refinement in Event-B
Alexei Iliasov, Elena Troubitsyna, Linas Laibinis, Alexander B. Romanovsky, Kimmo Varpaaniemi, Dubravka Ilic, Timo Latvala
Sci. Comput. Program.7
2012 Formal Development and Assessment of a Reconfigurable On-board Satellite System
Anton Tarasyuk, Inna Vistbakka, Elena Troubitsyna, Timo Latvala, Laura Nummila
SAFECOMP4
2011 Derivation and Formal Verification of a Mode Logic for Layered Control Systems
abstract
Modes are widely used to structure the behaviour of control systems. For many such systems, derivation and verification of a mode logic is challenging due to a large number of modes and complex mode transitions. In this paper we propose an approach to deriving, formalising and verifying consistency of a mode logic for fault tolerant control systems. We demonstrate how to use Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) to systematically derive the fault tolerance part of the mode logic. To tackle the problem of mode consistency, we propose a formalisation of the mode logic and mode consistency conditions for layered systems with reconfigurable components. We use our formalisation to develop and verify a mode-rich system by refinement in Event-B.
Yuliya Prokhorova, Linas Laibinis, Elena Troubitsyna, Kimmo Varpaaniemi, Timo Latvala
APSEC5
2010 Developing Mode-Rich Satellite Software by Refinement in Event B
Alexei Iliasov, Elena Troubitsyna, Linas Laibinis, Alexander B. Romanovsky, Kimmo Varpaaniemi, Dubravka Ilic, Timo Latvala
FMICS7
2010 Verifying Mode Consistency for On-Board Satellite Software
Alexei Iliasov, Elena Troubitsyna, Linas Laibinis, Alexander B. Romanovsky, Kimmo Varpaaniemi, Pauli Väisänen, Dubravka Ilic, Timo Latvala
SAFECOMP8
2006 Bounded Model Checking for Weak Alternating Büchi Automata
Keijo Heljanko, Tommi A. Junttila, Misa Keinänen, Martin Lange 0001, Timo Latvala
CAV5
2006 Linear Encodings of Bounded LTL Model Checking
abstract
We consider the problem of bounded model checking (BMC) for linear temporal logic (LTL). We present several efficient encodings that have size linear in the bound. Furthermore, we show how the encodings can be extended to LTL with past operators (PLTL). The generalised encoding is still of linear size, but cannot detect minimal length counterexamples. By using the virtual unrolling technique minimal length counterexamples can be captured, however, the size of the encoding is quadratic in the specification. We also extend virtual unrolling to Buchi automata, enabling them to accept minimal length counterexamples. Our BMC encodings can be made incremental in order to benefit from incremental SAT technology. With fairly small modifications the incremental encoding can be further enhanced with a termination check, allowing us to prove properties with BMC. Experiments clearly show that our new encodings improve performance of BMC considerably, particularly in the case of the incremental encoding, and that they are very competitive for finding bugs. An analysis of the liveness-to-safety transformation reveals many similarities to the BMC encodings in this paper. Using the liveness-to-safety translation with BDD-based invariant checking results in an efficient method to find shortest counterexamples that complements the BMC-based approach.
Armin Biere, Keijo Heljanko, Tommi A. Junttila, Timo Latvala, Viktor Schuppan
Log. Methods Comput. Sci.4
2005 Incremental and Complete Bounded Model Checking for Full PLTL
Keijo Heljanko, Tommi A. Junttila, Timo Latvala
CAV3
2005 Simple Is Better: Efficient Bounded Model Checking for Past LTL
Timo Latvala, Armin Biere, Keijo Heljanko, Tommi A. Junttila
VMCAI1
2004 Simple Bounded LTL Model Checking
Timo Latvala, Armin Biere, Keijo Heljanko, Tommi A. Junttila
FMCAD1
2000 Coping With Strong Fairness
abstract
We consider the verification of linear temporal logic (LTL) properties of Petri nets, where the transitions can have both weak and strong fairness constraints. Allowing the transitions to have weak or strong fairness constraints simplifies the modeling of systems in many cases. We use the automata theoretic approach to model checking. To cope with the strong fairness constraints efficiently we employ Streett automata where appropriate. We present memory efficient algorithms for both the emptiness checking and counterexample generation problems for Streett automata.
Timo Latvala, Keijo Heljanko
Fundam. Informaticae1