Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Naomi Novik

dblp:28/3398 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Performance modeling and evaluation · 85% Distributed systems · 15%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.122003
Measuring thin-client performance using slow-motion benchmarking · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2003
Measuring Thin-Client Performance Using Slow-Motion Benchmarking · USENIX ATC, General Track 2001
Distributed systems › distributed system architecture
thin-client computing
0.012003
Measuring thin-client performance using slow-motion benchmarking · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

packet trace capture · 0.0performance measurement · 0.0benchmarking · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 Measuring thin-client performance using slow-motion benchmarking
abstract
Modern thin-client systems are designed to provide the same graphical interfaces and applications available on traditional desktop computers while centralizing administration and allowing more efficient use of computing resources. Despite the rapidly increasing popularity of these client-server systems, there are few reliable analyses of their performance. Industry standard benchmark techniques commonly used for measuring desktop system performance are ill-suited for measuring the performance of thin-client systems because these benchmarks only measure application performance on the server, not the actual user-perceived performance on the client. To address this problem, we have developed slow-motion benchmarking, a new measurement technique for evaluating thin-client systems. In slow-motion benchmarking, performance is measured by capturing network packet traces between a thin client and its respective server during the execution of a slow-motion version of a conventional benchmark application. These results can then be used either independently or in conjunction with conventional benchmark results to yield an accurate and objective measure of the performance of thin-client systems. We have demonstrated the effectiveness of slow-motion benchmarking by using this technique to measure the performance of several popular thin-client systems in various network environments on Web and multimedia workloads. Our results show that slow-motion benchmarking solves the problems with using conventional benchmarks on thin-client systems and is an accurate tool for analyzing the performance of these systems.
Jason Nieh, S. Jae Yang, Naomi Novik
ACM Trans. Comput. Syst.3
2001 Measuring Thin-Client Performance Using Slow-Motion Benchmarking
S. Jae Yang, Jason Nieh, Naomi Novik
USENIX ATC, General Track3