EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Leonidas Lefakis
dblp:28/3492
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
8as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 8 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 20% Reinforcement learning · 19% Image recognition and object detection · 11% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
boosting |
0.3 | 2 | 2013 | Reservoir Boosting : Between Online and Offline Ensemble Learning · NIPS 2013 Joint Cascade Optimization Using A Product Of Boosted Classifiers · NIPS 2010 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
feature selection |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Jointly Informative Feature Selection Made Tractable by Gaussian Modeling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Jointly Informative Feature Selection Made Tractable by Gaussian Modeling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
goal-conditioned planning |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Dynamic Programming Boosting for Discriminative Macro-Action Discovery · ICML 2014 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Dynamic Programming Boosting for Discriminative Macro-Action Discovery · ICML 2014 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › hierarchical reinforcement learning
macro-action discovery |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Dynamic Programming Boosting for Discriminative Macro-Action Discovery · ICML 2014 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Reservoir Boosting : Between Online and Offline Ensemble Learning · NIPS 2013 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Reservoir Boosting : Between Online and Offline Ensemble Learning · NIPS 2013 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
cascade classifier |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Joint Cascade Optimization Using A Product Of Boosted Classifiers · NIPS 2010 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Joint Cascade Optimization Using A Product Of Boosted Classifiers · NIPS 2010 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Reservoir Boosting : Between Online and Offline Ensemble Learning · NIPS 2013 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face detection |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Joint Cascade Optimization Using A Product Of Boosted Classifiers · NIPS 2010 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
pedestrian detection |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Joint Cascade Optimization Using A Product Of Boosted Classifiers · NIPS 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
boosting · 0.3mutual information bounds · 0.2gaussian modeling · 0.2classification · 0.2dynamic programming · 0.2change point detection · 0.2reservoir sampling · 0.2greedy edge expectation maximization · 0.2noisy-AND model · 0.1cascade · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | FEIDEGGER: A Multi-modal Corpus of Fashion Images and Descriptions in German
Leonidas Lefakis, Alan Akbik, Roland Vollgraf |
LREC | 1 |
| 2016 | Jointly Informative Feature Selection Made Tractable by Gaussian ModelingabstractWe address the problem of selecting groups of jointly informative, continuous, features in the context of classification and propose several novel criteria for performing this selection. The proposed class of methods is based on combining a Gaussian modeling of the feature responses with derived bounds on and approximations to their mutual information with the class label. Furthermore, specific algorithmic implementations of these criteria are presented which reduce the computational complexity of the proposed feature selection algorithms by up to two-orders of magnitude. Consequently we show that feature selection based on the joint mutual information of features and class label is in fact tractable; this runs contrary to prior works that largely depend on marginal quantities. An empirical evaluation using several types of classifiers on multiple data sets show that this class of methods outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, both in terms of speed and classification accuracy. Leonidas Lefakis, François Fleuret |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2014 | Sample Distillation for Object Detection and Image Classification
Olivier Canévet, Leonidas Lefakis, François Fleuret |
ACML | 2 |
| 2014 | Jointly Informative Feature SelectionabstractWe propose several novel criteria for the selection of groups of jointly informative continuous features in the context of classification. Our approach is based on combining a Gaussian modeling of the feature responses, with derived upper bounds on their mutual information with the class label and their joint entropy. We further propose specific algorithmic implementations of these criteria which reduce the computational complexity of the algorithms by up to two-orders of magnitude, making these strategies tractable in practice. Experiments on multiple computer-vision data-bases, and using several types of classifiers, show that this class of methods outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, both in terms of speed and classification accuracy. Leonidas Lefakis, François Fleuret |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2014 | Dynamic Programming Boosting for Discriminative Macro-Action DiscoveryabstractWe consider the problem of automatic macro-action discovery in imitation learning, which we cast as one of change-point detection. Unlike prior work in change-point detection, the present work leverages discriminative learning algorithms. Our main contribution is a novel supervised learning algorithm which extends the classical Boosting framework by combining it with dynamic programming. The resulting process alternatively improves the performance of individual strong predictors and the estimated change-points in the training sequence. Empirical evaluation is presented for the proposed method on tasks where change-points arise naturally as part of a classification problem. Finally we show the applicability of the algorithm to macro-action discovery in imitation learning and demonstrate it allows us to solve complex image-based goal-planning problems with thousands of features. Leonidas Lefakis, François Fleuret |
ICML | 1 |
| 2013 | Reservoir Boosting : Between Online and Offline Ensemble LearningabstractWe propose to train an ensemble with the help of a reservoir in which the learning algorithm can store a limited number of samples. This novel approach lies in the area between offline and online ensemble approaches and can be seen either as a restriction of the former or an enhancement of the latter. We identify some basic strategies that can be used to populate this reservoir and present our main contribution, dubbed Greedy Edge Expectation Maximization (GEEM), that maintains the reservoir content in the case of Boosting by viewing the samples through their projections into the weak classifier response space. We propose an efficient algorithmic implementation which makes it tractable in practice, and demonstrate its efficiency experimentally on several compute-vision data-sets, on which it outperforms both online and offline methods in a memory constrained setting. Leonidas Lefakis, François Fleuret |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2012 | Macro-action Discovery Based on Change Point Detection and BoostingabstractWe present a novel approach to automatic macroaction discovery and its application to a complex goal-planning task. The problem of macro-action discovery is framed as one of multiple change point detection and is addressed with the help of the Dynamic Programming Boosting algorithm. The procedure is then employed to solve a complex goal-planning problem which entails an avatar navigating a 3D environment. By using DPBoost to decompose the problem into a number of simpler ones, we are able to successfully address both the complexity and partial observability of the environment. Leonidas Lefakis, François Fleuret |
ICMLA (1) | 1 |
| 2011 | The MASH Project
François Fleuret, Philip Abbet, Charles Dubout, Leonidas Lefakis |
ECML/PKDD (3) | 4 |
| 2010 | Boosted Edge Orientation Histograms for Grasping Point DetectionabstractIn this paper, we describe a novel algorithm for the detection of grasping points in images of previously unseen objects. A basic building block of our approach is the use of a newly devised descriptor, representing semi-local grasping point shape by the use edge orientation histograms. Combined with boosting, our method learns discriminative grasp point models for new objects from a set of annotated real-world images. The method has been extensively evaluated on challenging images of real scenes, exhibiting largely varying characteristics concerning illumination conditions, scene complexity, and viewpoint. Our experiments show that the method works in a stable manner and that its performance compares favorably to the state-of-the-art. Leonidas Lefakis, Horst Wildenauer, Manuel Pascual Garcia-Tubio, Lech Szumilas |
ICPR | 1 |
| 2010 | Joint Cascade Optimization Using A Product Of Boosted ClassifiersabstractThe standard strategy for efficient object detection consists of building a cascade composed of several binary classifiers. The detection process takes the form of a lazy evaluation of the conjunction of the responses of these classifiers, and concentrates the computation on difficult parts of the image which can not be trivially rejected. We introduce a novel algorithm to construct jointly the classifiers of such a cascade. We interpret the response of a classifier as a probability of a positive prediction, and the overall response of the cascade as the probability that all the predictions are positive. From this noisy-AND model, we derive a consistent loss and a Boosting procedure to optimize that global probability on the training set. Such a joint learning allows the individual predictors to focus on a more restricted modeling problem, and improves the performance compared to a standard cascade. We demonstrate the efficiency of this approach on face and pedestrian detection with standard data-sets and comparisons with reference baselines. Leonidas Lefakis, François Fleuret |
NIPS | 1 |