Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Carolin Kaiser

dblp:28/4502 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0009-0003-8563-8555ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 4 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing
collective intelligence
0.212015
Collective Intelligence in Computer-Mediated Collaboration Emerges in Different Contexts and Cultures · CHI 2015
Collaborative and social computing › computer-mediated communication
computer-mediated collaboration
0.212015
Collective Intelligence in Computer-Mediated Collaboration Emerges in Different Contexts and Cultures · CHI 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

standardized online battery · 0.2cross-cultural study · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Collective Intelligence in Computer-Mediated Collaboration Emerges in Different Contexts and Cultures
abstract
Collective intelligence (CI) is a property of groups that emerges from the coordination and collaboration of members and predicts group performance on a wide range of tasks. Previous studies of CI have been conducted with lab-based groups in the USA. We introduce a new standardized online battery to measure CI and demonstrate consistent emergence of a CI factor across three different studies despite broad differences in (a) communication media (face-to-face vs online), (b) group contexts (short-term ad hoc groups vs long-term groups) and (c) cultural settings (US, Germany, and Japan). In two of the studies, we also show that CI is correlated with a group's performance on more complex tasks. Consequently, the CI metric provides a generalizable performance measure for groups that is robust to broad changes in media, context, and culture, making it useful for testing the effects of general-purpose collaboration technologies intended to improve group performance.
David Engel, Anita Williams Woolley, Ishani Aggarwal, Christopher F. Chabris, Masamichi Takahashi, Keiichi Nemoto, Carolin Kaiser, Young Ji Kim, Thomas W. Malone
CHI7
2011 Warning system for online market research - Identifying critical situations in online opinion formation
Carolin Kaiser, Sabine Schlick, Freimut Bodendorf
Knowl. Based Syst.1
2010 Early Warning and Decision Support in Critical Situations of Opinion Formation within Online Social Networks
Carolin Kaiser, Sabine Schlick, Freimut Bodendorf
IC3K1
2010 Detecting Opinion Leaders and Trends in Online Communities
abstract
Today, online communities in the World Wide Web become increasingly interactive and networked. Web 2.0 technologies provide a multitude of platforms, such as blogs, wikis, and forums where for example consumers can disseminate data about products and manufacturers. This data provides an abundance of information on personal experiences and opinions which are extremely relevant for companies and sales organizations. Subjects of postings can be partly retrieved by state of the art text mining techniques. A much more challenging task is to detect factors influencing the evolvement of opinions within the social network. For such a kind of trend scouting you have to take into account the relationships among the community members. Social network analysis helps to explain social behavior of linked persons by providing quantitative measures of social interactions. A new approach based on social network analysis is presented, which allows detecting opinion leaders and opinion trends. This leads a better understanding of opinion formation. The overall concept based on text mining and social network analysis is introduced. An example is given which illustrates the analysis process.
Freimut Bodendorf, Carolin Kaiser
ICDS2
2010 Ant-Based Simulation of Opinion Spreading in Online Social Networks
abstract
An increasing number of people are socializing within online networks. By means of interaction, network members influence one another's opinion. For companies, it is important to know how opinions spread throughout networks in order to be able to take appropriate marketing actions. A new approach is presented which simulates the spread of opinions within online social networks. The principles of opinion formation are first revealed by ant mining algorithms coming from swarm intelligence and then applied to simulate the spread of opinions.
Carolin Kaiser, Johannes Kröckel, Freimut Bodendorf
Web Intelligence1
2009 Opinion and Relationship Mining in Online Forums
abstract
The Internet contains an increasing number of online forums where consumers exchange product opinions. It is important for companies to know how consumers judge their products and how these opinions are spread by interactions throughout online forums. With this knowledge it is possible to recognize risks and chances. However, classical opinion research is very time consuming and only possible to a certain extent. This paper introduces a system which automatically extracts opinions and communication relationships in forums by text mining and identifies influential users and trends by social network analysis.
Carolin Kaiser, Freimut Bodendorf
Web Intelligence1
2008 Bridging the Gap between Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Opinion Forums
abstract
An increasing number of users of opinion forums provide us with rich sources of data about customer opinions. Several fields of research deal with the analysis of qualitative or quantitative data. While affective text mining research explores qualitative data, social network analysis focuses on quantitative mining methods. A combined analysis of both information classes is still missing. However, this combined analysis is necessary for identifying the process of opinion formation in opinion forums. In this paper, we attempt to bridge this gap by applying new methods which are required for network analysis of opinion forum data. We are also presenting a plug-in for the popular biological research tool Cytoscape. This plug-in combined with visualization features of Cytoscape implements the key features described in this paper. Our approach will provide companies with information about chances and risks concerning their products.
Carolin Kaiser, Birinder S. Tiwana, Freimut Bodendorf
Web Intelligence1