Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Grigori Kuznetsov

dblp:28/4884 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › error detection
concurrent error detection
0.012003
Parity-Based Concurrent Error Detection of Substitution-Permutation Network Block Ciphers · CHES 2003
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › error detection
parity-based error detection
0.012003
Parity-Based Concurrent Error Detection of Substitution-Permutation Network Block Ciphers · CHES 2003
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
block cipher
0.012003
Parity-Based Concurrent Error Detection of Substitution-Permutation Network Block Ciphers · CHES 2003
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › block cipher
substitution-permutation network
0.012003
Parity-Based Concurrent Error Detection of Substitution-Permutation Network Block Ciphers · CHES 2003
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Low Cost Concurrent Error Detection for the Advanced Encryption Standard
abstract
We present a new low-cost concurrent checking method for the advanced encryption standard (AES) encryption algorithm. In this method, the parity of the 128-bit input is determined and modified step-by-step into the parity of the 128-bit output according to the processing steps of the AES encryption. For the parity-preserving AES steps shift-rows and mix-column no parity modifications are necessary. The modified parity is compared in any round with the actual parity of the outputs of the round. To obtain the hardware costs we implemented this method on a Xilinx Virtex 1000 FPGA. For this implementation, the hardware overhead is about 8% and the additional time delay is about 5%. The method detects technical faults and deliberately injected faults during normal operation.
Kaijie Wu 0001, Ramesh Karri, Grigori Kuznetsov, Michael Gössel
ITC3
2003 Parity-Based Concurrent Error Detection of Substitution-Permutation Network Block Ciphers
Ramesh Karri, Grigori Kuznetsov, Michael Gössel
CHES2
2003 Parity-Based Concurrent Error Detection in Symmetric Block Ciphers
abstract
Deliberate injection of faults into cryptographic devices is an effective cryptanalysis technique against symmetric and asymmetric encryption. We will describe a general concurrent error detection (CEO) approach against such attacks on symmetric block ciphers using CS-cipher as an example. The proposed CED compares a carefully modified parity of the input plain text with that of the output cipher text. An analysis of the CS-Cipher shows that on one hand the parity of its inputs is modijied by a constant one or zero by component-wise exclusive-or of inputs with the round keys and with the round constants; if the parity of the round keys and of the round constants is odd (even) the parity of the inputs is mod$ed by one (not modijied). On the other hand, the diffusion network based on the Fast Fourier Transform does not alter the parity. Finally, the 16-bit to 16-bit non-linear mixing function does not have any simple relation between the parity of its inputs and of its outputs. The mixing function is composed of a linear function q and a non-linear function p. In order to maintain the invariance of the parity from the inputs to the outputs of each CS-cipher encryption round, we added a parity correction term (exclusive-or of the parity of its inputs and outputs) to the non-linear function p and slightb modijied the parity function due to the linear function p Faults introduced into the CS-cipher design are detected by comparing the overall parity of the input mod$ed by the parity of the round keys, round constants and correction terms of the mixing functions with the parity of the (intermediate) cipher text obtained ajer every step of an encryption round.
Ramesh Karri, Grigori Kuznetsov, Michael Gössel
ITC2