Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xiang Wang 0002
dblp:28/6275
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
0000-0002-0446-860XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › text mining
topic model |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Mining common topics from multiple asynchronous text streams · WSDM 2009 |
Data mining › text mining
text stream mining |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Mining common topics from multiple asynchronous text streams · WSDM 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
generative topic model · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Mining common topics from multiple asynchronous text streamsabstractText streams are becoming more and more ubiquitous, in the forms of news feeds, weblog archives and so on, which result in a large volume of data. An effective way to explore the semantic as well as temporal information in text streams is topic mining, which can further facilitate other knowledge discovery procedures. In many applications, we are facing multiple text streams which are related to each other and share common topics. The correlation among these streams can provide more meaningful and comprehensive clues for topic mining than those from each individual stream. However, it is nontrivial to explore the correlation with the existence of asynchronism among multiple streams, i.e. documents from different streams about the same topic may have different timestamps, which remains unsolved in the context of topic mining. In this paper, we formally address this problem and put forward a novel algorithm based on the generative topic model. Our algorithm consists of two alternate steps: the first step extracts common topics from multiple streams based on the adjusted timestamps by the second step; the second step adjusts the timestamps of the documents according to the time distribution of the discovered topics by the first step. We perform these two steps alternately and a monotone convergence of our objective function is guaranteed. The effectiveness and advantage of our approach were justified by extensive empirical studies on two real data sets consisting of six research paper streams and two news article streams, respectively. Xiang Wang 0002, Xiaoming Jin, Dou Shen |
WSDM | 1 |
| 2006 | Understanding and Enhancing the Folding-In Method in Latent Semantic Indexing
Xiang Wang 0002, Xiaoming Jin |
DEXA | 1 |