Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Georg Hyla

dblp:28/77 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1976
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Rendering · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Rendering
raster graphics
0.011976
A Taxonomy of Display Processors · ISCA 1976

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

taxonomy · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1976 A Taxonomy of Display Processors
abstract
A potential customer examining computer graphics systems including a random positioning and refreshed CRT needs a lot of time and effort to form an opinion of the various marketed systems. To him not only systems appear very different, but also manuals are often cryptic and equivocal. In addition, graphic packages supplied by manufactures naturally take advantage of specific capabilities of the hardware and try to bypass their deficiencies. As a consequence, it is nearly impossible to run on a display system application programs which are written for another system.
Ulrich Trambacz, Georg Hyla
ISCA2