Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Frédéric Demoly
dblp:28/8673
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-5825-6573ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Geometric modeling and processing
shape analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Geometric skeleton computation enabling concurrent product engineering and assembly sequence planning · Comput. Aided Des. 2011 |
Geometric modeling and processing
skeletonization |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Geometric skeleton computation enabling concurrent product engineering and assembly sequence planning · Comput. Aided Des. 2011 |
Computational science and engineering › manufacturing automation
assembly sequence planning |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Geometric skeleton computation enabling concurrent product engineering and assembly sequence planning · Comput. Aided Des. 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
geometric skeleton · 0.2assembly planning · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Evaluating Neuro-Symbolic AI Architectures: Design Principles, Qualitative Benchmark, Comparative Analysis and ResultsabstractNeuro-symbolic artificial intelligence (NSAI) represents a transformative approach in artificial intelligence (AI) by combining deep learning’s ability to handle large-scale and unstructured data with the structured reasoning of symbolic methods. By leveraging their complementary strengths, NSAI enhances generalization, reasoning, and scalability while addressing key challenges such as transparency and data efficiency. This paper systematically studies diverse NSAI architectures, highlighting their unique approaches to integrating neural and symbolic components. This study then evaluates these architectures against comprehensive set of criteria, including generalization, reasoning capabilities, transferability, and interpretability, therefore providing a comparative analysis of their respective strengths and limitations. Notably, the Neuro $\rightarrow$ Symbolic $\leftarrow$ Neuro model consistenty outperforms its counterparts across all evaluation metrics. This result aligns with state-of-the-art research that highlight the efficacy of such architectures in harnessing advanced technologies like multi-agent systems. Moreover, our NSAI framework using retrieval-augmented illustrates how the 4D printing ontology can be systematically enriched with additional classes, object properties, data properties and individuals. Oualid Bougzime, Samir Jabbar, Christophe Cruz, Frédéric Demoly |
NeSy | 4 |
| 2015 | A formal ontology-based spatiotemporal mereotopology for integrated product design and assembly sequence planning
Elise Gruhier, Frédéric Demoly, Olivier Dutartre, Said Abboudi, Samuel Gomes |
Adv. Eng. Informatics | 2 |
| 2011 | Geometric skeleton computation enabling concurrent product engineering and assembly sequence planning
Frédéric Demoly, Luis Toussaint, Benoît Eynard, Dimitris Kiritsis, Samuel Gomes |
Comput. Aided Des. | 1 |