Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Frédéric Demoly

dblp:28/8673 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-5825-6573ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Geometric modeling and processing
shape analysis
0.112011
Geometric skeleton computation enabling concurrent product engineering and assembly sequence planning · Comput. Aided Des. 2011
Geometric modeling and processing
skeletonization
0.112011
Geometric skeleton computation enabling concurrent product engineering and assembly sequence planning · Comput. Aided Des. 2011
Computational science and engineering › manufacturing automation
assembly sequence planning
0.012011
Geometric skeleton computation enabling concurrent product engineering and assembly sequence planning · Comput. Aided Des. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

geometric skeleton · 0.2assembly planning · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Evaluating Neuro-Symbolic AI Architectures: Design Principles, Qualitative Benchmark, Comparative Analysis and Results
abstract
Neuro-symbolic artificial intelligence (NSAI) represents a transformative approach in artificial intelligence (AI) by combining deep learning’s ability to handle large-scale and unstructured data with the structured reasoning of symbolic methods. By leveraging their complementary strengths, NSAI enhances generalization, reasoning, and scalability while addressing key challenges such as transparency and data efficiency. This paper systematically studies diverse NSAI architectures, highlighting their unique approaches to integrating neural and symbolic components. This study then evaluates these architectures against comprehensive set of criteria, including generalization, reasoning capabilities, transferability, and interpretability, therefore providing a comparative analysis of their respective strengths and limitations. Notably, the Neuro $\rightarrow$ Symbolic $\leftarrow$ Neuro model consistenty outperforms its counterparts across all evaluation metrics. This result aligns with state-of-the-art research that highlight the efficacy of such architectures in harnessing advanced technologies like multi-agent systems. Moreover, our NSAI framework using retrieval-augmented illustrates how the 4D printing ontology can be systematically enriched with additional classes, object properties, data properties and individuals.
Oualid Bougzime, Samir Jabbar, Christophe Cruz, Frédéric Demoly
NeSy4
2015 A formal ontology-based spatiotemporal mereotopology for integrated product design and assembly sequence planning
Elise Gruhier, Frédéric Demoly, Olivier Dutartre, Said Abboudi, Samuel Gomes
Adv. Eng. Informatics2
2011 Geometric skeleton computation enabling concurrent product engineering and assembly sequence planning
Frédéric Demoly, Luis Toussaint, Benoît Eynard, Dimitris Kiritsis, Samuel Gomes
Comput. Aided Des.1