Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pengcheng Wang 0005

dblp:28/8740-5 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-4012-9293ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 67% Efficient and distributed learning · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › active learning
active sampling
0.812024
Active Prompting with Chain-of-Thought for Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › prompting
chain-of-thought prompting
0.812024
Active Prompting with Chain-of-Thought for Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
prompting
0.812024
Active Prompting with Chain-of-Thought for Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

uncertainty-based active learning · 0.8large language model · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Active Prompting with Chain-of-Thought for Large Language Models
abstract
The increasing scale of large language models (LLMs) brings emergent abilities to various complex tasks requiring reasoning, such as arithmetic and commonsense reasoning.It is known that the effective design of taskspecific prompts is critical for LLMs' ability to produce high-quality answers.In particular, an effective approach for complex questionand-answering tasks is example-based prompting with chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, which significantly improves the performance of LLMs.However, current CoT methods rely on a fixed set of human-annotated exemplars, which are not necessarily the most effective examples for different tasks.This paper proposes a new method, Active-Prompt, to adapt LLMs to different tasks with task-specific example prompts (annotated with human-designed CoT reasoning).For this purpose, we propose a solution to the key problem of determining which questions are the most important and helpful to annotate from a pool of task-specific queries.By borrowing ideas from the related problem of uncertainty-based active learning, we introduce several metrics to characterize the uncertainty so as to select the most uncertain questions for annotation.Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our proposed method, achieving superior performance on eight complex reasoning tasks.Further analyses of different uncertainty metrics, pool sizes, zero-shot learning, and accuracy-uncertainty relationships demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.1 (1) Uncertainty Estimation
Shizhe Diao, Pengcheng Wang 0005, Rui Pan 0002, Xiang Liu 0001, Tong Zhang 0001
ACL (1)2