Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Robert Lunde

dblp:280/1590 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 52% Graph learning · 24% Learning theory · 24%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 50% Mathematical optimization · 50%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
statistical inference
0.512021
Bootstrapping the Error of Oja's Algorithm · NeurIPS 2021
Algorithms and data structures › data streams › streaming algorithms
streaming PCA
0.512021
Bootstrapping the Error of Oja's Algorithm · NeurIPS 2021
Mathematical optimization
uncertainty quantification
0.512021
Bootstrapping the Error of Oja's Algorithm · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › resampling
jackknife estimator
0.412020
On the Theoretical Properties of the Network Jackknife · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Graph learning
network analysis
0.412020
On the Theoretical Properties of the Network Jackknife · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
variance estimation
0.412020
On the Theoretical Properties of the Network Jackknife · ICML 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

u-statistics · 1.0multiplier bootstrap · 1.0central limit theorem · 1.0subsampling · 0.4jackknife · 0.4efron-stein inequality · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Bootstrapping the Error of Oja's Algorithm
abstract
We consider the problem of quantifying uncertainty for the estimation error of the leading eigenvector from Oja's algorithm for streaming principal component analysis, where the data are generated IID from some unknown distribution. By combining classical tools from the U-statistics literature with recent results on high-dimensional central limit theorems for quadratic forms of random vectors and concentration of matrix products, we establish a weighted $\chi^2$ approximation result for the $\sin^2$ error between the population eigenvector and the output of Oja’s algorithm. Since estimating the covariance matrix associated with the approximating distribution requires knowledge of unknown model parameters, we propose a multiplier bootstrap algorithm that may be updated in an online manner. We establish conditions under which the bootstrap distribution is close to the corresponding sampling distribution with high probability, thereby establishing the bootstrap as a consistent inferential method in an appropriate asymptotic regime.
Robert Lunde, Purnamrita Sarkar, Rachel A. Ward
NeurIPS1
2020 On the Theoretical Properties of the Network Jackknife
abstract
We study the properties of a leave-node-out jackknife procedure for network data. Under the sparse graphon model, we prove an Efron-Stein-type inequality, showing that the network jackknife leads to conservative estimates of the variance (in expectation) for any network functional that is invariant to node permutation. For a general class of count functionals, we also establish consistency of the network jackknife. We complement our theoretical analysis with a range of simulated and real-data examples and show that the network jackknife offers competitive performance in cases where other resampling methods are known to be valid. In fact, for several network statistics, we see that the jackknife provides more accurate inferences compared to related methods such as subsampling.
Qiaohui Lin, Robert Lunde, Purnamrita Sarkar
ICML2