Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Luan
dblp:280/1711
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 33% Deep learning architectures and training · 25% Generative modeling · 14% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
few-shot learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction following |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scaling laws |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › autoregressive model
autoregressive image modeling |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Generative Pretraining From Pixels · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
autoregressive model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Generative Pretraining From Pixels · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training
generative pretraining |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Generative Pretraining From Pixels · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Generative Pretraining From Pixels · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling
transformer-based sequence modeling |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Generative Pretraining From Pixels · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
model parallelism |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 0.7pathways · 0.7linear probing · 0.4fine-tuning · 0.4VQVAE encoding · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with PathwaysabstractLarge language models have been shown to achieve remarkable performance across a variety of natural language tasks using few-shot learning, which drastically reduces the number of task-specific training examples needed to adapt the model to a particular application. To further our understanding of the impact of scale on few-shot learning, we trained a 540-billion parameter, densely activated, Transformer language model, which we call Pathways Language Model (PaLM). We trained PaLM on 6144 TPU v4 chips using Pathways, a new ML system which enables highly efficient training across multiple TPU Pods. We demonstrate continued benefits of scaling by achieving state-of-the-art few-shot learning results on hundreds of language understanding and generation benchmarks. On a number of these tasks, PaLM 540B achieves breakthrough performance, outperforming the finetuned state-of-the-art on a suite of multi-step reasoning tasks, and outperforming average human performance on the recently released BIG-bench benchmark. A significant number of BIG-bench tasks showed discontinuous improvements from model scale, meaning that performance steeply increased as we scaled to our largest model. PaLM also has strong capabilities in multilingual tasks and source code generation, which we demonstrate on a wide array of benchmarks. We additionally provide a comprehensive analysis on bias and toxicity, and study the extent of training data memorization with respect to model scale. Finally, we discuss the ethical considerations related to large language models and discuss potential mitigation strategies. Aakanksha Chowdhery, Sharan Narang, Jacob Devlin, Maarten Bosma, Adam Roberts, Paul Barham 0001, Hyung Won Chung, Charles Sutton, Sebastian Gehrmann, Parker Schuh, Kensen Shi, Sasha Tsvyashchenko, Joshua Maynez, Abhishek Rao, Parker Barnes, Yi Tay, Noam Shazeer, Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, Emily Reif, Nan Du 0002, Ben Hutchinson, Reiner Pope, Jacob Austin, Michael Isard, Guy Gur-Ari, Toju Duke, Anselm Levskaya, Sanjay Ghemawat, Sunipa Dev, Henryk Michalewski, Xavier Garcia, Vedant Misra, Kevin Robinson, William Fedus, Denny Zhou, Daphne Ippolito, David Luan, Hyeontaek Lim, Barret Zoph, Alexander Spiridonov, Ryan Sepassi, David Dohan, Shivani Agrawal, Mark Omernick, Andrew M. Dai, Thanumalayan Sankaranarayana Pillai, Marie Pellat, Aitor Lewkowycz, Erica Moreira, Rewon Child, Oleksandr Polozov, Katherine Lee, Zongwei Zhou, Xuezhi Wang 0002, Brennan Saeta, Mark Diaz, Orhan Firat, Michele Catasta, Jason Wei, Kathy Meier-Hellstern, Douglas Eck, Jeffrey Dean, Slav Petrov, Noah Fiedel |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 40 |
| 2020 | Generative Pretraining From PixelsabstractInspired by progress in unsupervised representation learning for natural language, we examine whether similar models can learn useful representations for images. We train a sequence Transformer to auto-regressively predict pixels, without incorporating knowledge of the 2D input structure. Despite training on low-resolution ImageNet without labels, we find that a GPT-2 scale model learns strong image representations as measured by linear probing, fine-tuning, and low-data classification. On CIFAR-10, we achieve 96.3% accuracy with a linear probe, outperforming a supervised Wide ResNet, and 99.0% accuracy with full fine-tuning, matching the top supervised pre-trained models. We are also competitive with self-supervised benchmarks on ImageNet when substituting pixels for a VQVAE encoding, achieving 69.0% top-1 accuracy on a linear probe of our features. Mark Chen 0003, Alec Radford, Rewon Child, Jeff Wu 0003, Heewoo Jun, David Luan, Ilya Sutskever |
ICML | 6 |