Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Mark Kurtz

dblp:280/1721 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 90% 3D vision · 7% Language models and text generation · 3%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
2.542025
"Give Me BF16 or Give Me Death"? Accuracy-Performance Trade-Offs in LLM Quantization · ACL (1) 2025
The Optimal BERT Surgeon: Scalable and Accurate Second-Order Pruning for Large Language Models · EMNLP 2022
How Well Do Sparse ImageNet Models Transfer? · CVPR 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
quantization
0.912025
"Give Me BF16 or Give Me Death"? Accuracy-Performance Trade-Offs in LLM Quantization · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference acceleration
0.722025
Inducing and Exploiting Activation Sparsity for Fast Inference on Deep Neural Networks · ICML 2020
"Give Me BF16 or Give Me Death"? Accuracy-Performance Trade-Offs in LLM Quantization · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning
0.612022
The Optimal BERT Surgeon: Scalable and Accurate Second-Order Pruning for Large Language Models · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning
second-order pruning
0.612022
The Optimal BERT Surgeon: Scalable and Accurate Second-Order Pruning for Large Language Models · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › sparsity
activation sparsity
0.412020
Inducing and Exploiting Activation Sparsity for Fast Inference on Deep Neural Networks · ICML 2020
Computer vision › 3D vision › point cloud processing
sparse convolution
0.412020
Inducing and Exploiting Activation Sparsity for Fast Inference on Deep Neural Networks · ICML 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.212022
The Optimal BERT Surgeon: Scalable and Accurate Second-Order Pruning for Large Language Models · EMNLP 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regularization · 1.0empirical study · 0.9INT8 · 0.9INT4 quantization · 0.9FP8 · 0.9second-order pruning · 0.6second-order optimization · 0.6magnitude pruning · 0.6lottery ticket · 0.6layer-wise pruning · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 "Give Me BF16 or Give Me Death"? Accuracy-Performance Trade-Offs in LLM Quantization
abstract
Quantization is a powerful tool for accelerating large language model (LLM) inference, but the accuracy-performance trade-offs across different formats remain unclear.In this paper, we conduct the most comprehensive empirical study to date, evaluating FP8, INT8, and INT4 quantization across academic benchmarks and real-world tasks on the entire Llama-3.1 model family.Through over 500,000 evaluations, our investigation yields several key findings: (1) FP8 (W8A8-FP) is effectively lossless across all model scales, (2) well-tuned INT8 (W8A8-INT) achieves surprisingly low (1-3%) accuracy degradation, and (3) INT4 weightonly (W4A16-INT) is more competitive than expected, rivaling 8-bit quantization.Further, we investigate the optimal quantization format for different deployments by analyzing inference performance through the popular vLLM framework.Our analysis provides clear deployment recommendations: W4A16 is the most cost-efficient for synchronous setups, while W8A8 dominates in asynchronous continuous batching.For mixed workloads, the optimal choice depends on the specific use case.Our findings offer practical, data-driven guidelines for deploying quantized LLMs at scale-ensuring the best balance between speed, efficiency, and accuracy.
Eldar Kurtic, Alexandre Noll Marques, Shubhra Pandit, Mark Kurtz, Dan Alistarh
ACL (1)4
2022 How Well Do Sparse ImageNet Models Transfer?
abstract
Transfer learning is a classic paradigm by which models pretrained on large “upstream” datasets are adapted to yield good results on “downstream” specialized datasets. Generally, more accurate models on the “upstream” dataset tend to provide better transfer accuracy “downstream”. In this work, we perform an in-depth investigation of this phenomenon in the context of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) trained on the ImageNet dataset, which have been pruned-that is, compressed by sparsifiying their connections. We consider transfer using unstructured pruned models obtained by applying several state-of-the-art pruning methods, including magnitude-based, second-order, regrowth, lottery-ticket, and regularization approaches, in the context of twelve standard transfer tasks. In a nutshell, our study shows that sparse models can match or even outperform the transfer performance of dense models, even at high sparsities, and, while doing so, can lead to significant inference and even training speedups. At the same time, we observe and analyze significant differences in the behaviour of different pruning methods. The code is available at: https://github.com/IST-DASLab/sparse-imagenet-transfer.
Eugenia Iofinova, Alexandra Peste, Mark Kurtz, Dan Alistarh
CVPR3
2022 The Optimal BERT Surgeon: Scalable and Accurate Second-Order Pruning for Large Language Models
abstract
Eldar Kurtic, Daniel Campos, Tuan Nguyen, Elias Frantar, Mark Kurtz, Benjamin Fineran, Michael Goin, Dan Alistarh. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2022.
Eldar Kurtic, Daniel Campos, Elias Frantar, Mark Kurtz, Benjamin Fineran, Michael Goin, Dan Alistarh
EMNLP5
2020 Inducing and Exploiting Activation Sparsity for Fast Inference on Deep Neural Networks
abstract
Optimizing convolutional neural networks for fast inference has recently become an extremely active area of research. One of the go-to solutions in this context is weight pruning, which aims to reduce computational and memory footprint by removing large subsets of the connections in a neural network. Surprisingly, much less attention has been given to exploiting sparsity in the activation maps, which tend to be naturally sparse in many settings thanks to the structure of rectified linear (ReLU) activation functions. In this paper, we present an in-depth analysis of methods for maximizing the sparsity of the activations in a trained neural network, and show that, when coupled with an efficient sparse-input convolution algorithm, we can leverage this sparsity for significant performance gains. To induce highly sparse activation maps without accuracy loss, we introduce a new regularization technique, coupled with a new threshold-based sparsification method based on a parameterized activation function called Forced-Activation-Threshold Rectified Linear Unit (FATReLU). We examine the impact of our methods on popular image classification models, showing that most architectures can adapt to significantly sparser activation maps without any accuracy loss. Our second contribution is showing that these these compression gains can be translated into inference speedups: we provide a new algorithm to enable fast convolution operations over networks with sparse activations, and show that it can enable significant speedups for end-to-end inference on a range of popular models on the large-scale ImageNet image classification task on modern Intel CPUs, with little or no retraining cost.
Mark Kurtz, Justin Kopinsky, Rati Gelashvili, Alexander Matveev, John Carr, Michael Goin, William M. Leiserson, Sage Moore, Nir Shavit, Dan Alistarh
ICML1