Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Elisa Nguyen

dblp:280/5837 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Optimization for machine learning · 19% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 14%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
1.522025
Better Training Data Attribution via Better Inverse Hessian-Vector Products · NeurIPS 2025
A Bayesian Approach To Analysing Training Data Attribution In Deep Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
training data attribution
1.522025
Better Training Data Attribution via Better Inverse Hessian-Vector Products · NeurIPS 2025
A Bayesian Approach To Analysing Training Data Attribution In Deep Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
posterior inference
0.712023
A Bayesian Approach To Analysing Training Data Attribution In Deep Learning · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neumann series iteration · 0.9EKFAC preconditioner · 0.9stochastic gradient descent · 0.7bayesian inference · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Better Training Data Attribution via Better Inverse Hessian-Vector Products
abstract
Training data attribution (TDA) provides insights into which training data is responsible for a learned model behavior. Gradient-based TDA methods such as influence functions and unrolled differentiation both involve a computation that resembles an inverse Hessian-vector product (iHVP), which is difficult to approximate efficiently. We introduce an algorithm (ASTRA) which uses the EKFAC-preconditioner on Neumann series iterations to arrive at an accurate iHVP approximation for TDA. ASTRA is easy to tune, requires fewer iterations than Neumann series iterations, and is more accurate than EKFAC-based approximations. Using ASTRA, we show that improving the accuracy of the iHVP approximation can significantly improve TDA performance.
Elisa Nguyen, Runshi Yang, Juhan Bae, Sheila A. McIlraith, Roger B. Grosse
NeurIPS2
2023 A Bayesian Approach To Analysing Training Data Attribution In Deep Learning
abstract
Training data attribution (TDA) techniques find influential training data for the model's prediction on the test data of interest. They approximate the impact of down- or up-weighting a particular training sample. While conceptually useful, they are hardly applicable to deep models in practice, particularly because of their sensitivity to different model initialisation. In this paper, we introduce a Bayesian perspective on the TDA task, where the learned model is treated as a Bayesian posterior and the TDA estimates as random variables. From this novel viewpoint, we observe that the influence of an individual training sample is often overshadowed by the noise stemming from model initialisation and SGD batch composition. Based on this observation, we argue that TDA can only be reliably used for explaining deep model predictions that are consistently influenced by certain training data, independent of other noise factors. Our experiments demonstrate the rarity of such noise-independent training-test data pairs but confirm their existence. We recommend that future researchers and practitioners trust TDA estimates only in such cases. Further, we find a disagreement between ground truth and estimated TDA distributions and encourage future work to study this gap. Code is provided at https://github.com/ElisaNguyen/bayesian-tda.
Elisa Nguyen, Minjoon Seo, Seong Joon Oh
NeurIPS1
2020 Pokérator - Unveil your inner Pokémon
Dominique Geißler, Elisa Nguyen, Daphne Theodorakopoulos, Lorenzo Gatti
ICCC2