Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Neeladri Sen
dblp:281/4890
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-3324-5755ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein function prediction |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | CATHe: detection of remote homologues for CATH superfamilies using embeddings from protein language models · Bioinform. 2023 CATH functional families predict functional sites in proteins · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure analysis › protein domain identification
protein domain classification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | CATHe: detection of remote homologues for CATH superfamilies using embeddings from protein language models · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
protein structure classification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | CATHe: detection of remote homologues for CATH superfamilies using embeddings from protein language models · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › homology detection
remote homology detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | CATHe: detection of remote homologues for CATH superfamilies using embeddings from protein language models · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction
functional site prediction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | CATH functional families predict functional sites in proteins · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction › protein classification
protein family classification |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | CATH functional families predict functional sites in proteins · Bioinform. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
protein language model embeddings · 0.7neural network · 0.7hidden markov model · 0.7machine learning · 0.5cross-validation · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | CATHe: detection of remote homologues for CATH superfamilies using embeddings from protein language modelsabstractMOTIVATION: CATH is a protein domain classification resource that exploits an automated workflow of structure and sequence comparison alongside expert manual curation to construct a hierarchical classification of evolutionary and structural relationships. The aim of this study was to develop algorithms for detecting remote homologues missed by state-of-the-art hidden Markov model (HMM)-based approaches. The method developed (CATHe) combines a neural network with sequence representations obtained from protein language models. It was assessed using a dataset of remote homologues having less than 20% sequence identity to any domain in the training set. RESULTS: The CATHe models trained on 1773 largest and 50 largest CATH superfamilies had an accuracy of 85.6 ± 0.4% and 98.2 ± 0.3%, respectively. As a further test of the power of CATHe to detect more remote homologues missed by HMMs derived from CATH domains, we used a dataset consisting of protein domains that had annotations in Pfam, but not in CATH. By using highly reliable CATHe predictions (expected error rate <0.5%), we were able to provide CATH annotations for 4.62 million Pfam domains. For a subset of these domains from Homo sapiens, we structurally validated 90.86% of the predictions by comparing their corresponding AlphaFold2 structures with structures from the CATH superfamilies to which they were assigned. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code for the developed models is available on https://github.com/vam-sin/CATHe, and the datasets developed in this study can be accessed on https://zenodo.org/record/6327572. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Vamsi Nallapareddy, Nicola Bordin, Ian Sillitoe, Michael Heinzinger, Maria Littmann, Vaishali P. Waman, Neeladri Sen, Burkhard Rost, Christine A. Orengo |
Bioinform. | 7 |
| 2022 | Characterizing and explaining the impact of disease-associated mutations in proteins without known structures or structural homologsabstractMutations in human proteins lead to diseases. The structure of these proteins can help understand the mechanism of such diseases and develop therapeutics against them. With improved deep learning techniques, such as RoseTTAFold and AlphaFold, we can predict the structure of proteins even in the absence of structural homologs. We modeled and extracted the domains from 553 disease-associated human proteins without known protein structures or close homologs in the Protein Databank. We noticed that the model quality was higher and the Root mean square deviation (RMSD) lower between AlphaFold and RoseTTAFold models for domains that could be assigned to CATH families as compared to those which could only be assigned to Pfam families of unknown structure or could not be assigned to either. We predicted ligand-binding sites, protein-protein interfaces and conserved residues in these predicted structures. We then explored whether the disease-associated missense mutations were in the proximity of these predicted functional sites, whether they destabilized the protein structure based on ddG calculations or whether they were predicted to be pathogenic. We could explain 80% of these disease-associated mutations based on proximity to functional sites, structural destabilization or pathogenicity. When compared to polymorphisms, a larger percentage of disease-associated missense mutations were buried, closer to predicted functional sites, predicted as destabilizing and pathogenic. Usage of models from the two state-of-the-art techniques provide better confidence in our predictions, and we explain 93 additional mutations based on RoseTTAFold models which could not be explained based solely on AlphaFold models. Neeladri Sen, Ivan Anishchenko, Nicola Bordin, Ian Sillitoe, Sameer Velankar, David Baker 0001, Christine A. Orengo |
Briefings Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2021 | The impact of structural bioinformatics tools and resources on SARS-CoV-2 research and therapeutic strategiesabstractSARS-CoV-2 is the causative agent of COVID-19, the ongoing global pandemic. It has posed a worldwide challenge to human health as no effective treatment is currently available to combat the disease. Its severity has led to unprecedented collaborative initiatives for therapeutic solutions against COVID-19. Studies resorting to structure-based drug design for COVID-19 are plethoric and show good promise. Structural biology provides key insights into 3D structures, critical residues/mutations in SARS-CoV-2 proteins, implicated in infectivity, molecular recognition and susceptibility to a broad range of host species. The detailed understanding of viral proteins and their complexes with host receptors and candidate epitope/lead compounds is the key to developing a structure-guided therapeutic design. Since the discovery of SARS-CoV-2, several structures of its proteins have been determined experimentally at an unprecedented speed and deposited in the Protein Data Bank. Further, specialized structural bioinformatics tools and resources have been developed for theoretical models, data on protein dynamics from computer simulations, impact of variants/mutations and molecular therapeutics. Here, we provide an overview of ongoing efforts on developing structural bioinformatics tools and resources for COVID-19 research. We also discuss the impact of these resources and structure-based studies, to understand various aspects of SARS-CoV-2 infection and therapeutic development. These include (i) understanding differences between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV, leading to increased infectivity of SARS-CoV-2, (ii) deciphering key residues in the SARS-CoV-2 involved in receptor-antibody recognition, (iii) analysis of variants in host proteins that affect host susceptibility to infection and (iv) analyses facilitating structure-based drug and vaccine design against SARS-CoV-2. Vaishali P. Waman, Neeladri Sen, Mihaly Varadi, Antoine Daina, Shoshana J. Wodak, Vincent Zoete, Sameer Velankar, Christine A. Orengo |
Briefings Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2021 | CATH functional families predict functional sites in proteinsabstractMOTIVATION: Identification of functional sites in proteins is essential for functional characterization, variant interpretation and drug design. Several methods are available for predicting either a generic functional site, or specific types of functional site. Here, we present FunSite, a machine learning predictor that identifies catalytic, ligand-binding and protein-protein interaction functional sites using features derived from protein sequence and structure, and evolutionary data from CATH functional families (FunFams). RESULTS: FunSite's prediction performance was rigorously benchmarked using cross-validation and a holdout dataset. FunSite outperformed other publicly available functional site prediction methods. We show that conserved residues in FunFams are enriched in functional sites. We found FunSite's performance depends greatly on the quality of functional site annotations and the information content of FunFams in the training data. Finally, we analyze which structural and evolutionary features are most predictive for functional sites. AVAILABILITYAND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/UCL/cath-funsite-predictor. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Sayoni Das, Harry M. Scholes, Neeladri Sen, Christine A. Orengo |
Bioinform. | 3 |