Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yaser Al-Onaizan
dblp:281/6653
· DBLP profile ↗
21ranked-venue papers
5as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 19 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
13 papers |
Language models and text generation · 33% Machine translation · 27% Information extraction and text analysis · 27% |
Topics — the 26 heaviest of 26, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
content selection |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Exploring Content Selection in Summarization of Novel Chapters · ACL 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
extractive summarization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Exploring Content Selection in Summarization of Novel Chapters · ACL 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
neural machine translation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Evaluating Robustness to Input Perturbations for Neural Machine Translation · ACL 2020 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual grounding
referring expression recognition |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Words Aren't Enough, Their Order Matters: On the Robustness of Grounding Visual Referring Expressions · ACL 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Words Aren't Enough, Their Order Matters: On the Robustness of Grounding Visual Referring Expressions · ACL 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sequence labeling |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | To BERT or Not to BERT: Comparing Task-specific and Task-agnostic Semi-Supervised Approaches for Sequence Tagging · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › tokenization › subword tokenization
subword regularization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Evaluating Robustness to Input Perturbations for Neural Machine Translation · ACL 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › temporal information extraction
temporal ordering |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Severing the Edge Between Before and After: Neural Architectures for Temporal Ordering of Events · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Exploring Content Selection in Summarization of Novel Chapters · ACL 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding
constrained decoding |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Training Neural Machine Translation to Apply Terminology Constraints · ACL (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Span-Level Model for Relation Extraction · ACL (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › constrained machine translation
terminology-constrained translation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Training Neural Machine Translation to Apply Terminology Constraints · ACL (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
abstract meaning representation parsing |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | AMR Parsing using Stack-LSTMs · EMNLP 2017 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | AMR Parsing using Stack-LSTMs · EMNLP 2017 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
low-resource machine translation |
0.3 | 2 | 2016 | Zero-Resource Translation with Multi-Lingual Neural Machine Translation · EMNLP 2016 Translating Named Entities Using Monolingual and Bilingual Resources · ACL 2002 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › neural machine translation
multilingual neural machine translation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Zero-Resource Translation with Multi-Lingual Neural Machine Translation · EMNLP 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
word reordering |
0.1 | 2 | 2008 | Generalizing Local and Non-Local Word-Reordering Patterns for Syntax-Based Machine Translation · EMNLP 2008 Distortion Models for Statistical Machine Translation · ACL 2006 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
pre-trained language model |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | To BERT or Not to BERT: Comparing Task-specific and Task-agnostic Semi-Supervised Approaches for Sequence Tagging · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
machine translation evaluation |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Goodness: A Method for Measuring Machine Translation Confidence · ACL 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
syntax-based machine translation |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Generalizing Local and Non-Local Word-Reordering Patterns for Syntax-Based Machine Translation · EMNLP 2008 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
distortion modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Distortion Models for Statistical Machine Translation · ACL 2006 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
statistical machine translation |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Distortion Models for Statistical Machine Translation · ACL 2006 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › machine translation evaluation
translation quality estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Goodness: A Method for Measuring Machine Translation Confidence · ACL 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
named entity recognition |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Translating Named Entities Using Monolingual and Bilingual Resources · ACL 2002 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
named entity translation |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Translating Named Entities Using Monolingual and Bilingual Resources · ACL 2002 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
n-gram language model |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Distortion Models for Statistical Machine Translation · ACL 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
semi-supervised learning · 0.4robustness metrics · 0.4neural architecture · 0.4multi-task learning · 0.4contrastive learning · 0.4alignment · 0.4BLEU · 0.4BERT · 0.4neural machine translation · 0.4constrained decoding · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Meta Learning to Classify Intent and Slot Labels with Noisy Few Shot ExamplesabstractRecently deep learning has dominated many machine learning areas, including spoken language understanding (SLU). However, deep learning models are notorious for being data-hungry, and the heavily optimized models are usually sensitive to the quality of the training examples provided and the consistency between training and inference conditions. To improve the performance of SLU models on tasks with noisy and low training resources, we propose a new SLU benchmarking task: few-shot robust SLU, where SLU comprises two core problems, intent classification (IC) and slot labeling (SL). We establish the task by defining few-shot splits on three public IC/SL datasets, ATIS, SNIPS, and TOP, and adding two types of natural noises (adaptation example missing/replacing and modality mismatch) to the splits. We further propose a novel noise-robust few-shot SLU model based on prototypical networks. We show the model consistently outperforms the conventional fine-tuning baseline and another popular meta-learning method, Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML), in terms of achieving better IC accuracy and SL F1, and yielding smaller performance variation when noises are present. Shang-Wen Li 0001, Jason Krone, Shuyan Dong, Yaser Al-Onaizan |
SLT | 5 |
| 2020 | Words Aren't Enough, Their Order Matters: On the Robustness of Grounding Visual Referring ExpressionsabstractVisual referring expression recognition is a challenging task that requires natural language understanding in the context of an image.We critically examine RefCOCOg, a standard benchmark for this task, using a human study and show that 83.7% of test instances do not require reasoning on linguistic structure, i.e., words are enough to identify the target object, the word order doesn't matter.To measure the true progress of existing models, we split the test set into two sets, one which requires reasoning on linguistic structure and the other which doesn't.Additionally, we create an out-of-distribution dataset Ref-Adv by asking crowdworkers to perturb in-domain examples such that the target object changes.Using these datasets, we empirically show that existing methods fail to exploit linguistic structure and are 12% to 23% lower in performance than the established progress for this task.We also propose two methods, one based on contrastive learning and the other based on multi-task learning, to increase the robustness of ViLBERT, the current state-ofthe-art model for this task.Our datasets are publicly Arjun R. Akula, Spandana Gella, Yaser Al-Onaizan, Song-Chun Zhu, Siva Reddy |
ACL | 3 |
| 2020 | Exploring Content Selection in Summarization of Novel ChaptersabstractWe present a new summarization task, generating summaries of novel chapters using summary/chapter pairs from online study guides.This is a harder task than the news summarization task, given the chapter length as well as the extreme paraphrasing and generalization found in the summaries.We focus on extractive summarization, which requires the creation of a gold-standard set of extractive summaries.We present a new metric for aligning reference summary sentences with chapter sentences to create gold extracts and also experiment with different alignment methods.Our experiments demonstrate significant improvement over prior alignment approaches for our task as shown through automatic metrics and a crowd-sourced pyramid analysis. Faisal Ladhak, Bryan Li, Yaser Al-Onaizan, Kathy McKeown |
ACL | 3 |
| 2020 | Evaluating Robustness to Input Perturbations for Neural Machine TranslationabstractNeural Machine Translation (NMT) models are sensitive to small perturbations in the input.Robustness to such perturbations is typically measured using translation quality metrics such as BLEU on the noisy input.This paper proposes additional metrics which measure the relative degradation and changes in translation when small perturbations are added to the input.We focus on a class of models employing subword regularization to address robustness and perform extensive evaluations of these models using the robustness measures proposed.Results show that our proposed metrics reveal a clear trend of improved robustness to perturbations when subword regularization methods are used. Xing Niu 0001, Prashant Mathur, Georgiana Dinu, Yaser Al-Onaizan |
ACL | 4 |
| 2020 | Severing the Edge Between Before and After: Neural Architectures for Temporal Ordering of EventsabstractMiguel Ballesteros, Rishita Anubhai, Shuai Wang, Nima Pourdamghani, Yogarshi Vyas, Jie Ma, Parminder Bhatia, Kathleen McKeown, Yaser Al-Onaizan. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 2020. Miguel Ballesteros, Rishita Anubhai, Nima Pourdamghani, Yogarshi Vyas, Jie Ma 0005, Parminder Bhatia, Kathy McKeown, Yaser Al-Onaizan |
EMNLP (1) | 9 |
| 2020 | To BERT or Not to BERT: Comparing Task-specific and Task-agnostic Semi-Supervised Approaches for Sequence TaggingabstractKasturi Bhattacharjee, Miguel Ballesteros, Rishita Anubhai, Smaranda Muresan, Jie Ma, Faisal Ladhak, Yaser Al-Onaizan. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 2020. Kasturi Bhattacharjee, Miguel Ballesteros, Rishita Anubhai, Smaranda Muresan, Jie Ma 0005, Faisal Ladhak, Yaser Al-Onaizan |
EMNLP (1) | 7 |
| 2019 | Training Neural Machine Translation to Apply Terminology ConstraintsabstractThis paper proposes a novel method to inject custom terminology into neural machine translation at run time.Previous works have mainly proposed modifications to the decoding algorithm in order to constrain the output to include run-time-provided target terms.While being effective, these constrained decoding methods add, however, significant computational overhead to the inference step, and, as we show in this paper, can be brittle when tested in realistic conditions.In this paper we approach the problem by training a neural MT system to learn how to use custom terminology when provided with the input.Comparative experiments show that our method is not only more effective than a state-of-the-art implementation of constrained decoding, but is also as fast as constraint-free decoding. Georgiana Dinu, Prashant Mathur, Marcello Federico, Yaser Al-Onaizan |
ACL (1) | 4 |
| 2019 | Span-Level Model for Relation ExtractionabstractRelation Extraction is the task of identifying entity mention spans in raw text and then identifying relations between pairs of the entity mentions. Recent approaches for this span-level task have been token-level models which have inherent limitations. They cannot easily define and implement span-level features, cannot model overlapping entity mentions and have cascading errors due to the use of sequential decoding. To address these concerns, we present a model which directly models all possible spans and performs joint entity mention detection and relation extraction. We report a new state-of-the-art performance of 62.83 F1 (prev best was 60.49) on the ACE2005 dataset. Kalpit Dixit, Yaser Al-Onaizan |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2017 | AMR Parsing using Stack-LSTMsabstractWe present a transition-based AMR parser that directly generates AMR parses from plain text.We use Stack-LSTMs to represent our parser state and make decisions greedily.In our experiments, we show that our parser achieves very competitive scores on English using only AMR training data.Adding additional information, such as POS tags and dependency trees, improves the results further. Miguel Ballesteros, Yaser Al-Onaizan |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2016 | Zero-Resource Translation with Multi-Lingual Neural Machine TranslationabstractIn this paper, we propose a novel finetuning algorithm for the recently introduced multiway, multilingual neural machine translate that enables zero-resource machine translation.When used together with novel manyto-one translation strategies, we empirically show that this finetuning algorithm allows the multi-way, multilingual model to translate a zero-resource language pair (1) as well as a single-pair neural translation model trained with up to 1M direct parallel sentences of the same language pair and (2) better than pivotbased translation strategy, while keeping only one additional copy of attention-related parameters. Orhan Firat, Baskaran Sankaran, Yaser Al-Onaizan, Fatos T. Yarman-Vural, Kyunghyun Cho |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2014 | Improving Egyptian-to-English SMT by Mapping Egyptian into MSA
Nadir Durrani, Yaser Al-Onaizan, Abraham Ittycheriah |
CICLing (2) | 2 |
| 2011 | Goodness: A Method for Measuring Machine Translation Confidence
Nguyen Bach, Fei Huang 0002, Yaser Al-Onaizan |
ACL | 3 |
| 2008 | Generalizing Local and Non-Local Word-Reordering Patterns for Syntax-Based Machine Translation
Yaser Al-Onaizan |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2007 | Arabic ASR and MT Integration for GALEabstractIn this paper we describe our work in machine translation of Arabic speech into English. This work was done within the context of the GALE research program. We describe several integration techniques between our ASR and MT system. Our initial results suggest that tighter coupling between ASR and MT system improves the translation quality of speech input. We explore the effect of each integration technique on the overall system. Yaser Al-Onaizan, Lidia Mangu |
ICASSP (4) | 1 |
| 2006 | Distortion Models for Statistical Machine TranslationabstractIn this paper, we argue that n-gram language models are not sufficient to address word reordering required for Machine Translation. We propose a new distortion model that can be used with existing phrase-based SMT decoders to address those n-gram language model limitations. We present empirical results in Arabic to English Machine Translation that show statistically significant improvements when our proposed model is used. We also propose a novel metric to measure word order similarity (or difference) between any pair of languages based on word alignments. Yaser Al-Onaizan, Kishore Papineni |
ACL | 1 |
| 2003 | TIPS: A Translingual Information Processing System
Yaser Al-Onaizan, Radu Florian, Martin Franz, Hany Hassan, Young-Suk Lee 0001, J. Scott McCarley, Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Jeffrey S. Sorensen, Christoph Tillmann, Todd Ward |
HLT-NAACL | 1 |
| 2002 | Translating Named Entities Using Monolingual and Bilingual ResourcesabstractNamed entity phrases are some of the most difficult phrases to translate because new phrases can appear from nowhere, and because many are domain specific, not to be found in bilingual dictionaries. We present a novel algorithm for translating named entity phrases using easily obtainable monolingual and bilingual resources. We report on the application and evaluation of this algorithm in translating Arabic named entities to English. We also compare our results with the results obtained from human translations and a commercial system for the same task. Yaser Al-Onaizan, Kevin Knight |
ACL | 1 |
| 2002 | Translation with Scarce Bilingual Resources
Yaser Al-Onaizan, Ulrich Germann, Ulf Hermjakob, Kevin Knight, Philipp Koehn, Daniel Marcu, Kenji Yamada |
Mach. Transl. | 1 |
| 2001 | Experiences Acquired in the Design of RoboCup Teams: A Comparison of Two Fielded Teams
Stacy Marsella, Milind Tambe, Jafar Adibi, Yaser Al-Onaizan, Gal A. Kaminka, Ion Muslea |
Auton. Agents Multi Agent Syst. | 4 |
| 1998 | Using an Explicit Teamwork Model and Learning in RoboCup: An Extended Abstract
Stacy Marsella, Jafar Adibi, Yaser Al-Onaizan, Ali Erdem, Randall W. Hill Jr., Gal A. Kaminka, Zhun Qiu, Milind Tambe |
RoboCup | 3 |
| 1997 | Using an Explicit Model of Teamwork in RoboCup-97
Milind Tambe, Jafar Adibi, Yaser Al-Onaizan, Ali Erdem, Gal A. Kaminka, Stacy Marsella, Ion Muslea, Marcelo Tallis |
RoboCup | 3 |