Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yaser Al-Onaizan

dblp:281/6653 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
21ranked-venue papers
5as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 19 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
13 papers
Language models and text generation · 33% Machine translation · 27% Information extraction and text analysis · 27%

Topics — the 26 heaviest of 26, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
content selection
0.412020
Exploring Content Selection in Summarization of Novel Chapters · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
extractive summarization
0.412020
Exploring Content Selection in Summarization of Novel Chapters · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
neural machine translation
0.412020
Evaluating Robustness to Input Perturbations for Neural Machine Translation · ACL 2020
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual grounding
referring expression recognition
0.412020
Words Aren't Enough, Their Order Matters: On the Robustness of Grounding Visual Referring Expressions · ACL 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.412020
Words Aren't Enough, Their Order Matters: On the Robustness of Grounding Visual Referring Expressions · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sequence labeling
0.412020
To BERT or Not to BERT: Comparing Task-specific and Task-agnostic Semi-Supervised Approaches for Sequence Tagging · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › tokenization › subword tokenization
subword regularization
0.412020
Evaluating Robustness to Input Perturbations for Neural Machine Translation · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › temporal information extraction
temporal ordering
0.412020
Severing the Edge Between Before and After: Neural Architectures for Temporal Ordering of Events · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization
0.412020
Exploring Content Selection in Summarization of Novel Chapters · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding
constrained decoding
0.412019
Training Neural Machine Translation to Apply Terminology Constraints · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction
0.412019
Span-Level Model for Relation Extraction · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › constrained machine translation
terminology-constrained translation
0.412019
Training Neural Machine Translation to Apply Terminology Constraints · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
abstract meaning representation parsing
0.312017
AMR Parsing using Stack-LSTMs · EMNLP 2017
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing
0.312017
AMR Parsing using Stack-LSTMs · EMNLP 2017
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
low-resource machine translation
0.322016
Zero-Resource Translation with Multi-Lingual Neural Machine Translation · EMNLP 2016
Translating Named Entities Using Monolingual and Bilingual Resources · ACL 2002
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › neural machine translation
multilingual neural machine translation
0.212016
Zero-Resource Translation with Multi-Lingual Neural Machine Translation · EMNLP 2016
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
word reordering
0.122008
Generalizing Local and Non-Local Word-Reordering Patterns for Syntax-Based Machine Translation · EMNLP 2008
Distortion Models for Statistical Machine Translation · ACL 2006
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
pre-trained language model
0.112020
To BERT or Not to BERT: Comparing Task-specific and Task-agnostic Semi-Supervised Approaches for Sequence Tagging · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
machine translation evaluation
0.112011
Goodness: A Method for Measuring Machine Translation Confidence · ACL 2011
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
syntax-based machine translation
0.112008
Generalizing Local and Non-Local Word-Reordering Patterns for Syntax-Based Machine Translation · EMNLP 2008
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
distortion modeling
0.112006
Distortion Models for Statistical Machine Translation · ACL 2006
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
statistical machine translation
0.112006
Distortion Models for Statistical Machine Translation · ACL 2006
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › machine translation evaluation
translation quality estimation
0.012011
Goodness: A Method for Measuring Machine Translation Confidence · ACL 2011
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
named entity recognition
0.012002
Translating Named Entities Using Monolingual and Bilingual Resources · ACL 2002
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
named entity translation
0.012002
Translating Named Entities Using Monolingual and Bilingual Resources · ACL 2002
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
n-gram language model
0.012006
Distortion Models for Statistical Machine Translation · ACL 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semi-supervised learning · 0.4robustness metrics · 0.4neural architecture · 0.4multi-task learning · 0.4contrastive learning · 0.4alignment · 0.4BLEU · 0.4BERT · 0.4neural machine translation · 0.4constrained decoding · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Meta Learning to Classify Intent and Slot Labels with Noisy Few Shot Examples
abstract
Recently deep learning has dominated many machine learning areas, including spoken language understanding (SLU). However, deep learning models are notorious for being data-hungry, and the heavily optimized models are usually sensitive to the quality of the training examples provided and the consistency between training and inference conditions. To improve the performance of SLU models on tasks with noisy and low training resources, we propose a new SLU benchmarking task: few-shot robust SLU, where SLU comprises two core problems, intent classification (IC) and slot labeling (SL). We establish the task by defining few-shot splits on three public IC/SL datasets, ATIS, SNIPS, and TOP, and adding two types of natural noises (adaptation example missing/replacing and modality mismatch) to the splits. We further propose a novel noise-robust few-shot SLU model based on prototypical networks. We show the model consistently outperforms the conventional fine-tuning baseline and another popular meta-learning method, Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML), in terms of achieving better IC accuracy and SL F1, and yielding smaller performance variation when noises are present.
Shang-Wen Li 0001, Jason Krone, Shuyan Dong, Yaser Al-Onaizan
SLT5
2020 Words Aren't Enough, Their Order Matters: On the Robustness of Grounding Visual Referring Expressions
abstract
Visual referring expression recognition is a challenging task that requires natural language understanding in the context of an image.We critically examine RefCOCOg, a standard benchmark for this task, using a human study and show that 83.7% of test instances do not require reasoning on linguistic structure, i.e., words are enough to identify the target object, the word order doesn't matter.To measure the true progress of existing models, we split the test set into two sets, one which requires reasoning on linguistic structure and the other which doesn't.Additionally, we create an out-of-distribution dataset Ref-Adv by asking crowdworkers to perturb in-domain examples such that the target object changes.Using these datasets, we empirically show that existing methods fail to exploit linguistic structure and are 12% to 23% lower in performance than the established progress for this task.We also propose two methods, one based on contrastive learning and the other based on multi-task learning, to increase the robustness of ViLBERT, the current state-ofthe-art model for this task.Our datasets are publicly
Arjun R. Akula, Spandana Gella, Yaser Al-Onaizan, Song-Chun Zhu, Siva Reddy
ACL3
2020 Exploring Content Selection in Summarization of Novel Chapters
abstract
We present a new summarization task, generating summaries of novel chapters using summary/chapter pairs from online study guides.This is a harder task than the news summarization task, given the chapter length as well as the extreme paraphrasing and generalization found in the summaries.We focus on extractive summarization, which requires the creation of a gold-standard set of extractive summaries.We present a new metric for aligning reference summary sentences with chapter sentences to create gold extracts and also experiment with different alignment methods.Our experiments demonstrate significant improvement over prior alignment approaches for our task as shown through automatic metrics and a crowd-sourced pyramid analysis.
Faisal Ladhak, Bryan Li, Yaser Al-Onaizan, Kathy McKeown
ACL3
2020 Evaluating Robustness to Input Perturbations for Neural Machine Translation
abstract
Neural Machine Translation (NMT) models are sensitive to small perturbations in the input.Robustness to such perturbations is typically measured using translation quality metrics such as BLEU on the noisy input.This paper proposes additional metrics which measure the relative degradation and changes in translation when small perturbations are added to the input.We focus on a class of models employing subword regularization to address robustness and perform extensive evaluations of these models using the robustness measures proposed.Results show that our proposed metrics reveal a clear trend of improved robustness to perturbations when subword regularization methods are used.
Xing Niu 0001, Prashant Mathur, Georgiana Dinu, Yaser Al-Onaizan
ACL4
2020 Severing the Edge Between Before and After: Neural Architectures for Temporal Ordering of Events
abstract
Miguel Ballesteros, Rishita Anubhai, Shuai Wang, Nima Pourdamghani, Yogarshi Vyas, Jie Ma, Parminder Bhatia, Kathleen McKeown, Yaser Al-Onaizan. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 2020.
Miguel Ballesteros, Rishita Anubhai, Nima Pourdamghani, Yogarshi Vyas, Jie Ma 0005, Parminder Bhatia, Kathy McKeown, Yaser Al-Onaizan
EMNLP (1)9
2020 To BERT or Not to BERT: Comparing Task-specific and Task-agnostic Semi-Supervised Approaches for Sequence Tagging
abstract
Kasturi Bhattacharjee, Miguel Ballesteros, Rishita Anubhai, Smaranda Muresan, Jie Ma, Faisal Ladhak, Yaser Al-Onaizan. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 2020.
Kasturi Bhattacharjee, Miguel Ballesteros, Rishita Anubhai, Smaranda Muresan, Jie Ma 0005, Faisal Ladhak, Yaser Al-Onaizan
EMNLP (1)7
2019 Training Neural Machine Translation to Apply Terminology Constraints
abstract
This paper proposes a novel method to inject custom terminology into neural machine translation at run time.Previous works have mainly proposed modifications to the decoding algorithm in order to constrain the output to include run-time-provided target terms.While being effective, these constrained decoding methods add, however, significant computational overhead to the inference step, and, as we show in this paper, can be brittle when tested in realistic conditions.In this paper we approach the problem by training a neural MT system to learn how to use custom terminology when provided with the input.Comparative experiments show that our method is not only more effective than a state-of-the-art implementation of constrained decoding, but is also as fast as constraint-free decoding.
Georgiana Dinu, Prashant Mathur, Marcello Federico, Yaser Al-Onaizan
ACL (1)4
2019 Span-Level Model for Relation Extraction
abstract
Relation Extraction is the task of identifying entity mention spans in raw text and then identifying relations between pairs of the entity mentions. Recent approaches for this span-level task have been token-level models which have inherent limitations. They cannot easily define and implement span-level features, cannot model overlapping entity mentions and have cascading errors due to the use of sequential decoding. To address these concerns, we present a model which directly models all possible spans and performs joint entity mention detection and relation extraction. We report a new state-of-the-art performance of 62.83 F1 (prev best was 60.49) on the ACE2005 dataset.
Kalpit Dixit, Yaser Al-Onaizan
ACL (1)2
2017 AMR Parsing using Stack-LSTMs
abstract
We present a transition-based AMR parser that directly generates AMR parses from plain text.We use Stack-LSTMs to represent our parser state and make decisions greedily.In our experiments, we show that our parser achieves very competitive scores on English using only AMR training data.Adding additional information, such as POS tags and dependency trees, improves the results further.
Miguel Ballesteros, Yaser Al-Onaizan
EMNLP2
2016 Zero-Resource Translation with Multi-Lingual Neural Machine Translation
abstract
In this paper, we propose a novel finetuning algorithm for the recently introduced multiway, multilingual neural machine translate that enables zero-resource machine translation.When used together with novel manyto-one translation strategies, we empirically show that this finetuning algorithm allows the multi-way, multilingual model to translate a zero-resource language pair (1) as well as a single-pair neural translation model trained with up to 1M direct parallel sentences of the same language pair and (2) better than pivotbased translation strategy, while keeping only one additional copy of attention-related parameters.
Orhan Firat, Baskaran Sankaran, Yaser Al-Onaizan, Fatos T. Yarman-Vural, Kyunghyun Cho
EMNLP3
2014 Improving Egyptian-to-English SMT by Mapping Egyptian into MSA
Nadir Durrani, Yaser Al-Onaizan, Abraham Ittycheriah
CICLing (2)2
2011 Goodness: A Method for Measuring Machine Translation Confidence
Nguyen Bach, Fei Huang 0002, Yaser Al-Onaizan
ACL3
2008 Generalizing Local and Non-Local Word-Reordering Patterns for Syntax-Based Machine Translation
Yaser Al-Onaizan
EMNLP2
2007 Arabic ASR and MT Integration for GALE
abstract
In this paper we describe our work in machine translation of Arabic speech into English. This work was done within the context of the GALE research program. We describe several integration techniques between our ASR and MT system. Our initial results suggest that tighter coupling between ASR and MT system improves the translation quality of speech input. We explore the effect of each integration technique on the overall system.
Yaser Al-Onaizan, Lidia Mangu
ICASSP (4)1
2006 Distortion Models for Statistical Machine Translation
abstract
In this paper, we argue that n-gram language models are not sufficient to address word reordering required for Machine Translation. We propose a new distortion model that can be used with existing phrase-based SMT decoders to address those n-gram language model limitations. We present empirical results in Arabic to English Machine Translation that show statistically significant improvements when our proposed model is used. We also propose a novel metric to measure word order similarity (or difference) between any pair of languages based on word alignments.
Yaser Al-Onaizan, Kishore Papineni
ACL1
2003 TIPS: A Translingual Information Processing System
Yaser Al-Onaizan, Radu Florian, Martin Franz, Hany Hassan, Young-Suk Lee 0001, J. Scott McCarley, Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Jeffrey S. Sorensen, Christoph Tillmann, Todd Ward
HLT-NAACL1
2002 Translating Named Entities Using Monolingual and Bilingual Resources
abstract
Named entity phrases are some of the most difficult phrases to translate because new phrases can appear from nowhere, and because many are domain specific, not to be found in bilingual dictionaries. We present a novel algorithm for translating named entity phrases using easily obtainable monolingual and bilingual resources. We report on the application and evaluation of this algorithm in translating Arabic named entities to English. We also compare our results with the results obtained from human translations and a commercial system for the same task.
Yaser Al-Onaizan, Kevin Knight
ACL1
2002 Translation with Scarce Bilingual Resources
Yaser Al-Onaizan, Ulrich Germann, Ulf Hermjakob, Kevin Knight, Philipp Koehn, Daniel Marcu, Kenji Yamada
Mach. Transl.1
2001 Experiences Acquired in the Design of RoboCup Teams: A Comparison of Two Fielded Teams
Stacy Marsella, Milind Tambe, Jafar Adibi, Yaser Al-Onaizan, Gal A. Kaminka, Ion Muslea
Auton. Agents Multi Agent Syst.4
1998 Using an Explicit Teamwork Model and Learning in RoboCup: An Extended Abstract
Stacy Marsella, Jafar Adibi, Yaser Al-Onaizan, Ali Erdem, Randall W. Hill Jr., Gal A. Kaminka, Zhun Qiu, Milind Tambe
RoboCup3
1997 Using an Explicit Model of Teamwork in RoboCup-97
Milind Tambe, Jafar Adibi, Yaser Al-Onaizan, Ali Erdem, Gal A. Kaminka, Stacy Marsella, Ion Muslea, Marcelo Tallis
RoboCup3