EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jithendaraa Subramanian
dblp:281/6755
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 36% Language models and text generation · 18% Time series and sequential data · 18% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
foundation model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Context is Key: A Benchmark for Forecasting with Essential Textual Information · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Context is Key: A Benchmark for Forecasting with Essential Textual Information · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › large language model for time series
LLM-based forecasting |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Context is Key: A Benchmark for Forecasting with Essential Textual Information · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › foundation model
time series foundation model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Context is Key: A Benchmark for Forecasting with Essential Textual Information · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › structure learning
bayesian network structure learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Joint Bayesian Inference of Graphical Structure and Parameters with a Single Generative Flow Network · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative flow networks |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Joint Bayesian Inference of Graphical Structure and Parameters with a Single Generative Flow Network · NeurIPS 2023 |
Privacy and data protection › regulatory compliance
compliance verification |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | PrivGuard: Privacy Regulation Compliance Made Easier · USENIX Security Symposium 2022 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy compliance |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | PrivGuard: Privacy Regulation Compliance Made Easier · USENIX Security Symposium 2022 |
Privacy and data protection
regulatory compliance |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | PrivGuard: Privacy Regulation Compliance Made Easier · USENIX Security Symposium 2022 |
Machine learning and data management
multimodal learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Context is Key: A Benchmark for Forecasting with Essential Textual Information · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical forecasting · 1.7LLM prompting · 1.7generative flow networks · 0.7bayesian inference · 0.7policy analysis · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Context is Key: A Benchmark for Forecasting with Essential Textual InformationabstractForecasting is a critical task in decision-making across numerous domains. While historical numerical data provide a start, they fail to convey the complete context for reliable and accurate predictions. Human forecasters frequently rely on additional information, such as background knowledge and constraints, which can efficiently be communicated through natural language. However, in spite of recent progress with LLM-based forecasters, their ability to effectively integrate this textual information remains an open question. To address this, we introduce "Context is Key" (CiK), a time-series forecasting benchmark that pairs numerical data with diverse types of carefully crafted textual context, requiring models to integrate both modalities; crucially, every task in CiK requires understanding textual context to be solved successfully. We evaluate a range of approaches, including statistical models, time series foundation models, and LLM-based forecasters, and propose a simple yet effective LLM prompting method that outperforms all other tested methods on our benchmark. Our experiments highlight the importance of incorporating contextual information, demonstrate surprising performance when using LLM-based forecasting models, and also reveal some of their critical shortcomings. This benchmark aims to advance multimodal forecasting by promoting models that are both accurate and accessible to decision-makers with varied technical expertise. The benchmark can be visualized at https://servicenow.github.io/context-is-key-forecasting/v0. Andrew Robert Williams, Arjun Ashok, Étienne Marcotte, Valentina Zantedeschi, Jithendaraa Subramanian, Roland Riachi, James Requeima, Alexandre Lacoste, Irina Rish, Nicolas Chapados, Alexandre Drouin |
ICML | 5 |
| 2023 | Joint Bayesian Inference of Graphical Structure and Parameters with a Single Generative Flow NetworkabstractGenerative Flow Networks (GFlowNets), a class of generative models over discrete and structured sample spaces, have been previously applied to the problem of inferring the marginal posterior distribution over the directed acyclic graph (DAG) of a Bayesian Network, given a dataset of observations. Based on recent advances extending this framework to non-discrete sample spaces, we propose in this paper to approximate the joint posterior over not only the structure of a Bayesian Network, but also the parameters of its conditional probability distributions. We use a single GFlowNet whose sampling policy follows a two-phase process: the DAG is first generated sequentially one edge at a time, and then the corresponding parameters are picked once the full structure is known. Since the parameters are included in the posterior distribution, this leaves more flexibility for the local probability models of the Bayesian Network, making our approach applicable even to non-linear models parametrized by neural networks. We show that our method, called JSP-GFN, offers an accurate approximation of the joint posterior, while comparing favorably against existing methods on both simulated and real data. Tristan Deleu, Mizu Nishikawa-Toomey, Jithendaraa Subramanian, Nikolay Malkin, Laurent Charlin, Yoshua Bengio |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2022 | PrivGuard: Privacy Regulation Compliance Made Easier
Lun Wang 0001, Usmann Khan, Joseph P. Near, Qi Pang, Jithendaraa Subramanian, Neel Somani, Peng Gao 0008, Andrew Low, Dawn Song |
USENIX Security Symposium | 5 |