Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jay Karhade
dblp:281/7332
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-1464-9399ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
3D vision · 55% Robot navigation and mapping · 24% Segmentation and scene understanding · 11% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Wireless sensing and localization · 100% |
Topics — the 20 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | UFM: A Simple Path towards Unified Dense Correspondence with Flow · NeurIPS 2025 SplaTAM: Splat, Track & Map 3D Gaussians for Dense RGB-D SLAM · CVPR 2024 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
SLAM |
1.5 | 2 | 2024 | SubT-MRS Dataset: Pushing SLAM Towards All-weather Environments · CVPR 2024 SplaTAM: Splat, Track & Map 3D Gaussians for Dense RGB-D SLAM · CVPR 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene understanding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards Foundational Models for Single-Chip Radar · ICCV 2025 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › motion analysis
camera motion understanding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards Understanding Camera Motions in Any Video · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › correspondence estimation
dense correspondence |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | UFM: A Simple Path towards Unified Dense Correspondence with Flow · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
optical flow |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | UFM: A Simple Path towards Unified Dense Correspondence with Flow · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › semantic segmentation › non-RGB semantic segmentation
radar semantic segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards Foundational Models for Single-Chip Radar · ICCV 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene understanding
semantic scene completion |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards Foundational Models for Single-Chip Radar · ICCV 2025 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards Foundational Models for Single-Chip Radar · ICCV 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
video-language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards Understanding Camera Motions in Any Video · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › feature matching › local feature matching
wide-baseline matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | UFM: A Simple Path towards Unified Dense Correspondence with Flow · NeurIPS 2025 |
Wireless sensing and localization › radar sensing
mmwave radar sensing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards Foundational Models for Single-Chip Radar · ICCV 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › neural rendering
3d gaussian splatting |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SplaTAM: Splat, Track & Map 3D Gaussians for Dense RGB-D SLAM · CVPR 2024 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › SLAM › dense SLAM
dense RGB-D SLAM |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SplaTAM: Splat, Track & Map 3D Gaussians for Dense RGB-D SLAM · CVPR 2024 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › SLAM
multi-sensor SLAM |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SubT-MRS Dataset: Pushing SLAM Towards All-weather Environments · CVPR 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
novel view synthesis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SplaTAM: Splat, Track & Map 3D Gaussians for Dense RGB-D SLAM · CVPR 2024 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › SLAM
robust SLAM |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SubT-MRS Dataset: Pushing SLAM Towards All-weather Environments · CVPR 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene modeling
scene representation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SplaTAM: Splat, Track & Map 3D Gaussians for Dense RGB-D SLAM · CVPR 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
camera motion estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Towards Understanding Camera Motions in Any Video · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
structure from motion |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Towards Understanding Camera Motions in Any Video · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 2.6foundation model · 1.7video-language model fine-tuning · 0.9structure from motion · 0.9self-supervised pretraining · 0.9self-supervised pre-training · 0.9flow regression · 0.9online tracking and mapping · 0.8LiDAR-inertial-thermal fusion · 0.83d gaussian representation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Towards Foundational Models for Single-Chip RadarabstractmmWave radars are compact, inexpensive, and durable sensors that are robust to occlusions and work regardless of environmental conditions, such as weather and darkness. However, this comes at the cost of poor angular resolution, especially for inexpensive single-chip radars, which are typically used in automotive and indoor sensing applications. Although many have proposed learning-based methods to mitigate this weakness, no standardized foundational models or large datasets for the mmWave radar have emerged, and practitioners have largely trained task-specific models from scratch using relatively small datasets. In this paper, we collect (to our knowledge) the largest available raw radar dataset with 1M samples (29 hours) and train a foundational model for 4D single-chip radar, which can predict 3D occupancy and semantic segmentation with quality that is typically only possible with much higher resolution sensors. We demonstrate that our Generalizable Radar Transformer (GRT) generalizes across diverse settings, can be fine-tuned for different tasks, and shows logarithmic data scaling of 20\% per $10\times$ data. We also run extensive ablations on common design decisions, and find that using raw radar data significantly outperforms widely-used lossy representations, equivalent to a $10\times$ increase in training data. Finally, we roughly estimate that $\approx$100M samples (3000 hours) of data are required to fully exploit the potential of GRT. Tianshu Huang, Akarsh Prabhakara, Chuhan Chen, Jay Karhade, Deva Ramanan, Matthew O'Toole, Anthony Rowe 0001 |
ICCV | 4 |
| 2025 | Towards Understanding Camera Motions in Any VideoabstractWe introduce CameraBench, a large-scale dataset and benchmark designed to assess and improve camera motion understanding. CameraBench consists of ~3,000 diverse internet videos, annotated by experts through a rigorous multi-stage quality control process. One of our core contributions is a taxonomy or "language" of camera motion primitives, designed in collaboration with cinematographers. We find, for example, that some motions like "follow" (or tracking) require understanding scene content like moving subjects. We conduct a large-scale human study to quantify human performance, revealing that domain expertise and tutorial-based training can significantly enhance accuracy. For example, a novice may confuse zoom-in (a change of intrinsics) with translating forward (a change of extrinsics), but can be trained to differentiate the two. Using CameraBench, we evaluate Structure-from-Motion (SfM) and Video-Language Models (VLMs), finding that SfM models struggle to capture semantic primitives that depend on scene content, while generative VLMs struggle to capture geometric primitives that require precise estimation of trajectories. We then fine-tune a generative VLM on CameraBench to achieve the best of both worlds and showcase its applications, including motion-augmented captioning, video question answering, and video-text retrieval. We hope our taxonomy, benchmark, and tutorials will drive future efforts towards the ultimate goal of understanding camera motions in any video. Zhiqiu Lin, Siyuan Cen, Jay Karhade, Hewei Wang 0001, Chancharik Mitra, Yu Tong Tiffany Ling, Rushikesh Zawar, Yilun Du, Chuang Gan 0001, Deva Ramanan |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2025 | UFM: A Simple Path towards Unified Dense Correspondence with FlowabstractDense image correspondence is central to many applications, such as visual odometry, 3D reconstruction, object association, and re-identification. Historically, dense correspondence has been tackled separately for wide-baseline scenarios and optical flow estimation, despite the common goal of matching content between two images. In this paper, we develop a Unified Flow \& Matching model (UFM), which is trained on unified data for pixels that are co-visible in both source and target images. UFM uses a simple, generic transformer architecture that directly regresses the $(u,v)$ flow. It is easier to train and more accurate for large flows compared to the typical coarse-to-fine cost volumes in prior work. UFM is 28\% more accurate than state-of-the-art flow methods (Unimatch), while also having 62\% less error and 6.7x faster than dense wide-baseline matchers (RoMa). UFM is the first to demonstrate that unified training can outperform specialized approaches across both domains. This result enables fast, general-purpose correspondence and opens new directions for multi-modal, long-range, and real-time correspondence tasks. Nikhil Varma Keetha, Chenwei Lyu, Bhuvan Jhamb, Yuheng Qiu, Jay Karhade, Shreyas Jha, Yaoyu Hu, Deva Ramanan, Sebastian A. Scherer |
NeurIPS | 7 |
| 2024 | SplaTAM: Splat, Track & Map 3D Gaussians for Dense RGB-D SLAMabstractDense simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) is crucial for robotics and augmented reality applications. However, current methods are often hampered by the non-volumetric or implicit way they represent a scene. This work introduces SplaTAM, an approach that, for the first time, leverages explicit volumetric representations, i.e., 3D Gaussians, to enable high-fidelity reconstruction from a single unposed RGB-D camera, surpassing the capabilities of existing methods. SplaTAM employs a simple online tracking and mapping system tailored to the underlying Gaussian representation. It utilizes a silhouette mask to elegantly capture the presence of scene density. This combination enables several benefits over prior representations, including fast rendering and dense optimization, quickly determining if areas have been previously mapped, and structured map expansion by adding more Gaussians. Extensive experiments show that SplaTAM achieves up to 2 x superior performance in camera pose estimation, map construction, and novel-view synthesis over existing methods, paving the way for more immersive high-fidelity SLAM applications. Nikhil Varma Keetha, Jay Karhade, Krishna Murthy Jatavallabhula, Gengshan Yang, Sebastian A. Scherer, Deva Ramanan, Jonathon Luiten |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2024 | SubT-MRS Dataset: Pushing SLAM Towards All-weather EnvironmentsabstractSimultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) is a fundamental task for numerous applications such as autonomous navigation and exploration. Despite many SLAM datasets have been released, current SLAM solutions still struggle to have sustained and resilient performance. One major issue is the absence of high-quality datasets including diverse all-weather conditions and a reliable metric for assessing robustness. This limitation significantly restricts the scalability and generalizability of SLAM technologies, impacting their development, validation, and deployment. To address this problem, we present SubT-MRS, an ex-tremely challenging real-world dataset designed to push SLAM towards all-weather environments to pursue the most robust SLAM performance. It contains multi-degraded en-vironments including over 30 diverse scenes such as structureless corridors, varying lighting conditions, and perceptual obscurants like smoke and dust; multimodal sensors such as LiDAR, fisheye camera, IMU, and thermal camera; and multiple locomotions like aerial, legged, and wheeled robots. We developed accuracy and robustness evaluation tracks for SLAM and introduced novel robustness metrics. Comprehensive studies are performed, revealing new obser-vations, challenges, and opportunities for future research. Shibo Zhao, Yuanjun Gao, Damanpreet Singh, Rushan Jiang, Haoxiang Sun, Mansi Sarawata, Yuheng Qiu, Warren Whittaker, Ian Higgins, Yi Du 0001, Shaoshu Su, John Keller, Jay Karhade, Lucas Nogueira, Sourojit Saha, Ji Zhang 0003, Chen Wang 0033, Sebastian A. Scherer |
CVPR | 15 |