EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Muhammed Ebrar Erdem
dblp:281/7628
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain shift |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Post-Hoc Uncertainty Calibration for Domain Drift Scenarios · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
post-hoc calibration |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Post-Hoc Uncertainty Calibration for Domain Drift Scenarios · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Post-Hoc Uncertainty Calibration for Domain Drift Scenarios · CVPR 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
post-hoc calibration · 0.5perturbation-based calibration · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Post-Hoc Uncertainty Calibration for Domain Drift ScenariosabstractWe address the problem of uncertainty calibration. While standard deep neural networks typically yield uncalibrated predictions, calibrated confidence scores that are representative of the true likelihood of a prediction can be achieved using post-hoc calibration methods. However, to date, the focus of these approaches has been on in-domain calibration. Our contribution is two-fold. First, we show that existing post-hoc calibration methods yield highly over-confident predictions under domain shift. Second, we introduce a simple strategy where perturbations are applied to samples in the validation set before performing the post-hoc calibration step. In extensive experiments, we demonstrate that this perturbation step results in substantially better calibration under domain shift on a wide range of architectures and modelling tasks. Christian Tomani, Sebastian Gruber 0001, Muhammed Ebrar Erdem, Daniel Cremers, Florian Buettner 0001 |
CVPR | 3 |