Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

James Queeney

dblp:281/8330 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-0655-3637ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Reinforcement learning · 61% Trustworthy machine learning · 14% Motion planning and robot control · 9%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization
1.022021
Generalized Proximal Policy Optimization with Sample Reuse · NeurIPS 2021
Uncertainty-Aware Policy Optimization: A Robust, Adaptive Trust Region Approach · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
proximal policy optimization
1.022021
Generalized Proximal Policy Optimization with Sample Reuse · NeurIPS 2021
Uncertainty-Aware Policy Optimization: A Robust, Adaptive Trust Region Approach · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning › occupancy matching
adversarial imitation learning
0.912025
Visually Robust Adversarial Imitation Learning from Videos with Contrastive Learning · ICRA 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning
0.912025
Visually Robust Adversarial Imitation Learning from Videos with Contrastive Learning · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Robot manipulation › learning from demonstration
learning from video demonstration
0.912025
Visually Robust Adversarial Imitation Learning from Videos with Contrastive Learning · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning
0.912025
Visually Robust Adversarial Imitation Learning from Videos with Contrastive Learning · ICRA 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distributionally robust optimization
0.712023
Risk-Averse Model Uncertainty for Distributionally Robust Safe Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.712023
Risk-Averse Model Uncertainty for Distributionally Robust Safe Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
safe reinforcement learning
0.712023
Risk-Averse Model Uncertainty for Distributionally Robust Safe Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy reinforcement learning
0.512021
Generalized Proximal Policy Optimization with Sample Reuse · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
uncertainty-aware policy optimization
0.512021
Uncertainty-Aware Policy Optimization: A Robust, Adaptive Trust Region Approach · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.312025
Visually Robust Adversarial Imitation Learning from Videos with Contrastive Learning · ICRA 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
visual representation learning
0.312025
Visually Robust Adversarial Imitation Learning from Videos with Contrastive Learning · ICRA 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning
0.112021
Uncertainty-Aware Policy Optimization: A Robust, Adaptive Trust Region Approach · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › sample efficiency
sample-efficient reinforcement learning
0.112021
Uncertainty-Aware Policy Optimization: A Robust, Adaptive Trust Region Approach · AAAI 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

off-policy adversarial imitation learning · 0.9data augmentation · 0.9contrastive learning · 0.9model-free reinforcement learning · 0.7coherent distortion risk measures · 0.7uncertainty estimation · 0.5trust region optimization · 0.5sample reuse · 0.5policy improvement bounds · 0.5clipping mechanism · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Visually Robust Adversarial Imitation Learning from Videos with Contrastive Learning
abstract
We propose C-LAIfO, a computationally efficient algorithm designed for imitation learning from videos in the presence of visual mismatch between agent and expert domains. We analyze the problem of imitation from expert videos with visual discrepancies, and introduce a solution for robust latent space estimation using contrastive learning and data augmentation. Provided a visually robust latent space, our algorithm performs imitation entirely within this space using off-policy adversarial imitation learning. We conduct a thorough ablation study to justify our design and test C-LAIfO on high-dimensional continuous robotic tasks. Additionally, we demonstrate how C LAIfO can be combined with other reward signals to facilitate learning on a set of challenging hand manipulation tasks with sparse rewards. Our experiments show improved performance compared to baseline methods, highlighting the effectiveness of C-LAIfO. To ensure reproducibility, we open source our code.
Vittorio Giammarino, James Queeney, Ioannis Paschalidis
ICRA2
2023 Risk-Averse Model Uncertainty for Distributionally Robust Safe Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Many real-world domains require safe decision making in uncertain environments. In this work, we introduce a deep reinforcement learning framework for approaching this important problem. We consider a distribution over transition models, and apply a risk-averse perspective towards model uncertainty through the use of coherent distortion risk measures. We provide robustness guarantees for this framework by showing it is equivalent to a specific class of distributionally robust safe reinforcement learning problems. Unlike existing approaches to robustness in deep reinforcement learning, however, our formulation does not involve minimax optimization. This leads to an efficient, model-free implementation of our approach that only requires standard data collection from a single training environment. In experiments on continuous control tasks with safety constraints, we demonstrate that our framework produces robust performance and safety at deployment time across a range of perturbed test environments.
James Queeney, Mouhacine Benosman
NeurIPS1
2021 Uncertainty-Aware Policy Optimization: A Robust, Adaptive Trust Region Approach
abstract
In order for reinforcement learning techniques to be useful in real-world decision making processes, they must be able to produce robust performance from limited data. Deep policy optimization methods have achieved impressive results on complex tasks, but their real-world adoption remains limited because they often require significant amounts of data to succeed. When combined with small sample sizes, these methods can result in unstable learning due to their reliance on high-dimensional sample-based estimates. In this work, we develop techniques to control the uncertainty introduced by these estimates. We leverage these techniques to propose a deep policy optimization approach designed to produce stable performance even when data is scarce. The resulting algorithm, Uncertainty-Aware Trust Region Policy Optimization, generates robust policy updates that adapt to the level of uncertainty present throughout the learning process.
James Queeney, Ioannis Paschalidis, Christos G. Cassandras
AAAI1
2021 Generalized Proximal Policy Optimization with Sample Reuse
abstract
In real-world decision making tasks, it is critical for data-driven reinforcement learning methods to be both stable and sample efficient. On-policy methods typically generate reliable policy improvement throughout training, while off-policy methods make more efficient use of data through sample reuse. In this work, we combine the theoretically supported stability benefits of on-policy algorithms with the sample efficiency of off-policy algorithms. We develop policy improvement guarantees that are suitable for the off-policy setting, and connect these bounds to the clipping mechanism used in Proximal Policy Optimization. This motivates an off-policy version of the popular algorithm that we call Generalized Proximal Policy Optimization with Sample Reuse. We demonstrate both theoretically and empirically that our algorithm delivers improved performance by effectively balancing the competing goals of stability and sample efficiency.
James Queeney, Ioannis Paschalidis, Christos G. Cassandras
NeurIPS1