EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Christian Tomani
dblp:281/8674
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
5as first author
6since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 69% Machine translation · 14% Efficient and distributed learning · 7% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
post-hoc calibration |
1.7 | 3 | 2023 | Beyond In-Domain Scenarios: Robust Density-Aware Calibration · ICML 2023 Parameterized Temperature Scaling for Boosting the Expressive Power in Post-Hoc Uncertainty Calibration · ECCV (13) 2022 Post-Hoc Uncertainty Calibration for Domain Drift Scenarios · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
1.7 | 3 | 2023 | Beyond In-Domain Scenarios: Robust Density-Aware Calibration · ICML 2023 Post-Hoc Uncertainty Calibration for Domain Drift Scenarios · CVPR 2021 Towards Trustworthy Predictions from Deep Neural Networks with Fast Adversarial Calibration · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
calibration |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Beyond In-Domain Scenarios: Robust Density-Aware Calibration · ICML 2023 What Makes Graph Neural Networks Miscalibrated? · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › inference efficiency
efficient generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Quality-Aware Translation Models: Efficient Generation and Quality Estimation in a Single Model · ACL (1) 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
neural machine translation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Quality-Aware Translation Models: Efficient Generation and Quality Estimation in a Single Model · ACL (1) 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › machine translation evaluation
translation quality estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Quality-Aware Translation Models: Efficient Generation and Quality Estimation in a Single Model · ACL (1) 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Beyond In-Domain Scenarios: Robust Density-Aware Calibration · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | What Makes Graph Neural Networks Miscalibrated? · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
graph neural network calibration |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | What Makes Graph Neural Networks Miscalibrated? · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
temperature scaling |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Parameterized Temperature Scaling for Boosting the Expressive Power in Post-Hoc Uncertainty Calibration · ECCV (13) 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
uncertainty calibration |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Parameterized Temperature Scaling for Boosting the Expressive Power in Post-Hoc Uncertainty Calibration · ECCV (13) 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Towards Trustworthy Predictions from Deep Neural Networks with Fast Adversarial Calibration · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain shift |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Post-Hoc Uncertainty Calibration for Domain Drift Scenarios · CVPR 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
temperature scaling · 1.1post-hoc calibration · 1.1quality estimation · 0.8multi-task learning · 0.8k-nearest neighbors · 0.7density estimation · 0.7calibration · 0.6attention-based architecture · 0.6bayesian neural network · 0.5adversarial calibration loss · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Quality-Aware Translation Models: Efficient Generation and Quality Estimation in a Single ModelabstractChristian Tomani, David Vilar, Markus Freitag, Colin Cherry, Subhajit Naskar, Mara Finkelstein, Xavier Garcia, Daniel Cremers. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024. Christian Tomani, David Vilar, Markus Freitag, Colin Cherry, Subhajit Naskar, Mara Finkelstein, Xavier Garcia, Daniel Cremers |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2023 | Beyond In-Domain Scenarios: Robust Density-Aware CalibrationabstractCalibrating deep learning models to yield uncertainty-aware predictions is crucial as deep neural networks get increasingly deployed in safety-critical applications. While existing post-hoc calibration methods achieve impressive results on in-domain test datasets, they are limited by their inability to yield reliable uncertainty estimates in domain-shift and out-of-domain (OOD) scenarios. We aim to bridge this gap by proposing DAC, an accuracy-preserving as well as Density-Aware Calibration method based on k-nearest-neighbors (KNN). In contrast to existing post-hoc methods, we utilize hidden layers of classifiers as a source for uncertainty-related information and study their importance. We show that DAC is a generic method that can readily be combined with state-of-the-art post-hoc methods. DAC boosts the robustness of calibration performance in domain-shift and OOD, while maintaining excellent in-domain predictive uncertainty estimates. We demonstrate that DAC leads to consistently better calibration across a large number of model architectures, datasets, and metrics. Additionally, we show that DAC improves calibration substantially on recent large-scale neural networks pre-trained on vast amounts of data. Christian Tomani, Futa Waseda, Yuesong Shen, Daniel Cremers |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | Parameterized Temperature Scaling for Boosting the Expressive Power in Post-Hoc Uncertainty Calibration
Christian Tomani, Daniel Cremers, Florian Buettner 0001 |
ECCV (13) | 1 |
| 2022 | What Makes Graph Neural Networks Miscalibrated?abstractGiven the importance of getting calibrated predictions and reliable uncertainty estimations, various post-hoc calibration methods have been developed for neural networks on standard multi-class classification tasks. However, these methods are not well suited for calibrating graph neural networks (GNNs), which presents unique challenges such as accounting for the graph structure and the graph-induced correlations between the nodes. In this work, we conduct a systematic study on the calibration qualities of GNN node predictions. In particular, we identify five factors which influence the calibration of GNNs: general under-confident tendency, diversity of nodewise predictive distributions, distance to training nodes, relative confidence level, and neighborhood similarity. Furthermore, based on the insights from this study, we design a novel calibration method named Graph Attention Temperature Scaling (GATS), which is tailored for calibrating graph neural networks. GATS incorporates designs that address all the identified influential factors and produces nodewise temperature scaling using an attention-based architecture. GATS is accuracy-preserving, data-efficient, and expressive at the same time. Our experiments empirically verify the effectiveness of GATS, demonstrating that it can consistently achieve state-of-the-art calibration results on various graph datasets for different GNN backbones. Hans Hao-Hsun Hsu, Yuesong Shen, Christian Tomani, Daniel Cremers |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2021 | Towards Trustworthy Predictions from Deep Neural Networks with Fast Adversarial CalibrationabstractTo facilitate a wide-spread acceptance of AI systems guiding decision making in real-world applications, trustworthiness of deployed models is key. That is, it is crucial for predictive models to be uncertainty-aware and yield well-calibrated (and thus trustworthy) predictions for both in-domain samples as well as under domain shift. Recent efforts to account for predictive uncertainty include post-processing steps for trained neural networks, Bayesian neural networks as well as alternative non-Bayesian approaches such as ensemble approaches and evidential deep learning. Here, we propose an efficient yet general modelling approach for obtaining well-calibrated, trustworthy probabilities for samples obtained after a domain shift. We introduce a new training strategy combining an entropy-encouraging loss term with an adversarial calibration loss term and demonstrate that this results in well-calibrated and technically trustworthy predictions for a wide range of domain drifts. We comprehensively evaluate previously proposed approaches on different data modalities, a large range of data sets including sequence data, network architectures and perturbation strategies. We observe that our modelling approach substantially outperforms existing state-of-the-art approaches, yielding well-calibrated predictions under domain drift. Christian Tomani, Florian Buettner 0001 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2021 | Post-Hoc Uncertainty Calibration for Domain Drift ScenariosabstractWe address the problem of uncertainty calibration. While standard deep neural networks typically yield uncalibrated predictions, calibrated confidence scores that are representative of the true likelihood of a prediction can be achieved using post-hoc calibration methods. However, to date, the focus of these approaches has been on in-domain calibration. Our contribution is two-fold. First, we show that existing post-hoc calibration methods yield highly over-confident predictions under domain shift. Second, we introduce a simple strategy where perturbations are applied to samples in the validation set before performing the post-hoc calibration step. In extensive experiments, we demonstrate that this perturbation step results in substantially better calibration under domain shift on a wide range of architectures and modelling tasks. Christian Tomani, Sebastian Gruber 0001, Muhammed Ebrar Erdem, Daniel Cremers, Florian Buettner 0001 |
CVPR | 1 |