Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yves Rychener

dblp:281/9820 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 50% Deep learning architectures and training · 25% Trustworthy machine learning · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
decision-focused learning
0.712023
End-to-End Learning for Stochastic Optimization: A Bayesian Perspective · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distributionally robust optimization
0.712023
End-to-End Learning for Stochastic Optimization: A Bayesian Perspective · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network training
end-to-end learning
0.712023
End-to-End Learning for Stochastic Optimization: A Bayesian Perspective · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization
0.712023
End-to-End Learning for Stochastic Optimization: A Bayesian Perspective · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

empirical risk minimization · 0.7bayesian inference · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Global Group Fairness in Federated Learning via Function Tracking
abstract
We investigate group fairness regularizers in federated learning, aiming to train a globally fair model in a distributed setting. Ensuring global fairness in distributed training presents unique challenges, as fairness regularizers typically involve probability metrics between distributions across all clients and are not naturally separable by client. To address this, we introduce a function-tracking scheme for the global fairness regularizer based on a Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD), which incurs a small communication overhead. This scheme seamlessly integrates into most federated learning algorithms while preserving rigorous convergence guarantees, as demonstrated in the context of FedAvg. Additionally, when enforcing differential privacy, the kernel-based MMD regularization enables straightforward analysis through a change of kernel, leveraging an intuitive interpretation of kernel convolution. Numerical experiments confirm our theoretical insights.
Yves Rychener, Daniel Kuhn 0001
AISTATS1
2023 End-to-End Learning for Stochastic Optimization: A Bayesian Perspective
abstract
We develop a principled approach to end-to-end learning in stochastic optimization. First, we show that the standard end-to-end learning algorithm admits a Bayesian interpretation and trains a posterior Bayes action map. Building on the insights of this analysis, we then propose new end-to-end learning algorithms for training decision maps that output solutions of empirical risk minimization and distributionally robust optimization problems, two dominant modeling paradigms in optimization under uncertainty. Numerical results for a synthetic newsvendor problem illustrate the key differences between alternative training schemes. We also investigate an economic dispatch problem based on real data to showcase the impact of the neural network architecture of the decision maps on their test performance.
Yves Rychener, Daniel Kuhn 0001, Tobias Sutter
ICML1