Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Danny Keller

dblp:281/9850 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Biometric security · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Biometric security
biometric recognition
0.512021
Inverting Binarizations of Facial Templates Produced by Deep Learning (and Its Implications) · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2021
Biometric security
biometric template protection
0.512021
Inverting Binarizations of Facial Templates Produced by Deep Learning (and Its Implications) · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2021
Biometric security
face recognition
0.512021
Inverting Binarizations of Facial Templates Produced by Deep Learning (and Its Implications) · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2021
Biometric security › biometric template protection › biometric cryptosystem
fuzzy commitment
0.112021
Inverting Binarizations of Facial Templates Produced by Deep Learning (and Its Implications) · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

white-box reversing attack · 0.5guessing attack · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Inverting Binarizations of Facial Templates Produced by Deep Learning (and Its Implications)
abstract
We focus on attacks against a biometric authentication system aimed at reconstructing a biometric sample of the subject from the protected template. Such systems include three blocks: feature extraction, binarization, and protection. We propose a new white-box reversing attack on the binarization block that approximates a biometric template given the binary string obtained by the binarization block. The experiments show that the proposed attack reconstructs very accurate approximations that pass the verification threshold when compared to templates produced from the same and different samples of the subject. We then integrate this attack with known attacks on the other two blocks, namely, a variant of a guessing attack to extract the binary string and biometric inversion attack to reconstruct a sample from its template. We instantiate this end-to-end attack on a face authentication system using fuzzy commitments for protection. Facial images reconstructed by the end-to-end attack greatly resemble the original ones. In the simplest attack scenario, more than 83% of these reconstructed templates succeed in unlocking an account (when the system is configured to 0.1% FMR). Even in the “hardest” settings (in which we take a reconstructed image from one system and use it in a different system, with a different feature extraction process) the reconstructed image offers 170 to 210 times higher success rates than the system's FMR.
Danny Keller, Margarita Osadchy, Orr Dunkelman
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.1