Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ashish Tendulkar
dblp:282/0472
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 43% Efficient and distributed learning · 28% Learning theory · 28% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data selection
data subset selection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Efficient Data Subset Selection to Generalize Training Across Models: Transductive and Inductive Networks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization
model generalization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Efficient Data Subset Selection to Generalize Training Across Models: Transductive and Inductive Networks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › point process › temporal point process
marked temporal point process |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning to Select Exogenous Events for Marked Temporal Point Process · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › point process
temporal point process |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning to Select Exogenous Events for Marked Temporal Point Process · NeurIPS 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization
submodular maximization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning to Select Exogenous Events for Marked Temporal Point Process · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic-greedy algorithm · 1.0parameter estimation · 1.0optimization · 0.7graph neural network · 0.7attention-based neural network · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Efficient Data Subset Selection to Generalize Training Across Models: Transductive and Inductive NetworksabstractExisting subset selection methods for efficient learning predominantly employ discrete combinatorial and model-specific approaches, which lack generalizability--- for each new model, the algorithm has to be executed from the beginning. Therefore, for an unseen architecture, one cannot use the subset chosen for a different model. In this work, we propose $\texttt{SubSelNet}$, a non-adaptive subset selection framework, which tackles these problems. Here, we first introduce an attention-based neural gadget that leverages the graph structure of architectures and acts as a surrogate to trained deep neural networks for quick model prediction. Then, we use these predictions to build subset samplers. This naturally provides us two variants of $\texttt{SubSelNet}$. The first variant is transductive (called Transductive-$\texttt{SubSelNet}$), which computes the subset separately for each model by solving a small optimization problem. Such an optimization is still super fast, thanks to the replacement of explicit model training by the model approximator. The second variant is inductive (called Inductive-$\texttt{SubSelNet}$), which computes the subset using a trained subset selector, without any optimization.
Our experiments show that our model outperforms several methods across several real datasets. Eeshaan Jain, Tushar Nandy, Gaurav Aggarwal, Ashish Tendulkar, Rishabh Iyer 0001, Abir De |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2021 | Learning to Select Exogenous Events for Marked Temporal Point ProcessabstractMarked temporal point processes (MTPPs) have emerged as a powerful modelingtool for a wide variety of applications which are characterized using discreteevents localized in continuous time. In this context, the events are of two typesendogenous events which occur due to the influence of the previous events andexogenous events which occur due to the effect of the externalities. However, inpractice, the events do not come with endogenous or exogenous labels. To thisend, our goal in this paper is to identify the set of exogenous events from a set ofunlabelled events. To do so, we first formulate the parameter estimation problemin conjunction with exogenous event set selection problem and show that thisproblem is NP hard. Next, we prove that the underlying objective is a monotoneand \alpha-submodular set function, with respect to the candidate set of exogenousevents. Such a characterization subsequently allows us to use a stochastic greedyalgorithm which was originally proposed in~\cite{greedy}for submodular maximization.However, we show that it also admits an approximation guarantee for maximizing\alpha-submodular set function, even when the learning algorithm provides an imperfectestimates of the trained parameters. Finally, our experiments with synthetic andreal data show that our method performs better than the existing approaches builtupon superposition of endogenous and exogenous MTPPs. Rishabh Iyer 0001, Ashish Tendulkar, Gaurav Aggarwal, Abir De |
NeurIPS | 3 |