Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ashish Tendulkar

dblp:282/0472 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 43% Efficient and distributed learning · 28% Learning theory · 28%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data selection
data subset selection
0.712023
Efficient Data Subset Selection to Generalize Training Across Models: Transductive and Inductive Networks · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization
model generalization
0.712023
Efficient Data Subset Selection to Generalize Training Across Models: Transductive and Inductive Networks · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › point process › temporal point process
marked temporal point process
0.512021
Learning to Select Exogenous Events for Marked Temporal Point Process · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › point process
temporal point process
0.512021
Learning to Select Exogenous Events for Marked Temporal Point Process · NeurIPS 2021
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization
submodular maximization
0.512021
Learning to Select Exogenous Events for Marked Temporal Point Process · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic-greedy algorithm · 1.0parameter estimation · 1.0optimization · 0.7graph neural network · 0.7attention-based neural network · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Efficient Data Subset Selection to Generalize Training Across Models: Transductive and Inductive Networks
abstract
Existing subset selection methods for efficient learning predominantly employ discrete combinatorial and model-specific approaches, which lack generalizability--- for each new model, the algorithm has to be executed from the beginning. Therefore, for an unseen architecture, one cannot use the subset chosen for a different model. In this work, we propose $\texttt{SubSelNet}$, a non-adaptive subset selection framework, which tackles these problems. Here, we first introduce an attention-based neural gadget that leverages the graph structure of architectures and acts as a surrogate to trained deep neural networks for quick model prediction. Then, we use these predictions to build subset samplers. This naturally provides us two variants of $\texttt{SubSelNet}$. The first variant is transductive (called Transductive-$\texttt{SubSelNet}$), which computes the subset separately for each model by solving a small optimization problem. Such an optimization is still super fast, thanks to the replacement of explicit model training by the model approximator. The second variant is inductive (called Inductive-$\texttt{SubSelNet}$), which computes the subset using a trained subset selector, without any optimization. Our experiments show that our model outperforms several methods across several real datasets.
Eeshaan Jain, Tushar Nandy, Gaurav Aggarwal, Ashish Tendulkar, Rishabh Iyer 0001, Abir De
NeurIPS4
2021 Learning to Select Exogenous Events for Marked Temporal Point Process
abstract
Marked temporal point processes (MTPPs) have emerged as a powerful modelingtool for a wide variety of applications which are characterized using discreteevents localized in continuous time. In this context, the events are of two typesendogenous events which occur due to the influence of the previous events andexogenous events which occur due to the effect of the externalities. However, inpractice, the events do not come with endogenous or exogenous labels. To thisend, our goal in this paper is to identify the set of exogenous events from a set ofunlabelled events. To do so, we first formulate the parameter estimation problemin conjunction with exogenous event set selection problem and show that thisproblem is NP hard. Next, we prove that the underlying objective is a monotoneand \alpha-submodular set function, with respect to the candidate set of exogenousevents. Such a characterization subsequently allows us to use a stochastic greedyalgorithm which was originally proposed in~\cite{greedy}for submodular maximization.However, we show that it also admits an approximation guarantee for maximizing\alpha-submodular set function, even when the learning algorithm provides an imperfectestimates of the trained parameters. Finally, our experiments with synthetic andreal data show that our method performs better than the existing approaches builtupon superposition of endogenous and exogenous MTPPs.
Rishabh Iyer 0001, Ashish Tendulkar, Gaurav Aggarwal, Abir De
NeurIPS3