Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wenjian Dong

dblp:282/3631 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0006-6878-8078ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data integration and cleaning · 33% Database system architecture and tuning · 33% Information retrieval · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › evaluation
benchmark
0.812024
Why TPC Is Not Enough: An Analysis of the Amazon Redshift Fleet · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Data integration and cleaning › data warehouse
cloud data warehouse
0.812024
Why TPC Is Not Enough: An Analysis of the Amazon Redshift Fleet · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Database system architecture and tuning
workload characterization
0.812024
Why TPC Is Not Enough: An Analysis of the Amazon Redshift Fleet · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

telemetrics · 0.8empirical analysis · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Forecasting Algorithms for Intelligent Resource Scaling: An Experimental Analysis
abstract
There has been a growing demand for making modern cloud-based data analytics systems cost-effective and easy to use. AI-powered intelligent resource scaling is one such effort, aiming at automating scaling decisions for serverless offerings like Amazon Redshift Serverless. The foundation of intelligent resource scaling lies in the ability to forecast query workloads and their resource consumption accurately. Although the forecasting problem has been extensively studied across various domains, there is a lack of thorough analysis of existing forecasting algorithms for large-scale, real-world cloud query workloads. This paper fills this gap by providing an in-depth analysis of forecasting algorithms for real-world cloud workloads, covering the fundamental data characteristics that distinguish query workload forecasting from prior problems and evaluating the strengths and limitations of existing algorithms in this new domain. We anticipate that our findings will provide valuable insights in informing the design of an efficient and effective solution for production use, as well as in steering the forecasting community toward more effective algorithms of high real-world impact.
Yanlei Diao, Dominik Horn, Andreas Kipf, Oleksandr Shchur, Ines Benito, Wenjian Dong, Davide Pagano, Pascal Pfeil, Vikram Nathan, Balakrishnan Narayanaswamy, Tim Kraska
SoCC6
2024 Why TPC Is Not Enough: An Analysis of the Amazon Redshift Fleet
abstract
Database research and development is heavily influenced by benchmarks, such as the industry-standard TPC-H and TPC-DS for analytical systems. However, these twenty-year-old benchmarks neither capture how databases are deployed nor what workloads modern cloud data warehouse systems face these days. In this paper, we summarize well-known, confirm suspected, and unearth novel discrepancies between TPC-H/DS and actual workloads using empirical data. We base our analysis on telemetrics from Amazon Redshift - one of the largest cloud data warehouse deployments. Among others, we show how write-heavy data pipelines are prominent, workloads vary over time (in both load and type), queries are repetitive, and how most properties of queries or workloads experience very long tailed distributions. We conclude that data warehouse benchmarks, just like database systems, need to become more holistic and stop focusing solely on query engine performance. Finally, we publish a dataset containing query statistics of 200 randomly selected Redshift serverless and provisioned instances (each) over a three-month period, as a basis for building more realistic benchmarks.
Alexander van Renen, Dominik Horn, Pascal Pfeil, Kapil Vaidya, Wenjian Dong, Murali Narayanaswamy, Zhengchun Liu, Andreas Kipf, Tim Kraska
Proc. VLDB Endow.5